Australian Medical Network – Open Letter to Atagi & TGA

Download PDF 📄
🕒 103 min read  •  ✍️ 20558 words

Fully-referenced grave concerns for vaccines in Australia from Covid Medical Network and Australian pathologists. Despite clear evidence from government-compiled data that the cure is worse than the disease, government officials continue the Safe & Effective Narrative.

Notes from the Open Letter to Atagi, TGA and the Federal Health Department where they are requesting an immediate withdrawal of the experimental gene-based treatments to the general public and especially children.

Covid Medical Network – 8 March 2022 | PDF | Annexures

  • I’ve broke-down their letter, kept their references, and added my own references & points (especially to any blog posts I’ve done about what they are bringing up).
  • My additions will be bullet points in this colour
  • If they’ve mentioned a video, I’ve embedded it.
  • If they linked to a url that has moved/changed, I’ve found the archive version and linked to that.
  • If you want to read their letter unchanged, please click here.
  • Questions to TGA/ATAGI are in this colour
Summary

We, the Covid Medical Network and co-signatories, are writing to you to follow up on prior correspondence to ATAGI, the TGA and the Health Minister, and FOIA requests to the TGA, where answers have either been not forthcoming or have indicated the TGA has lacked critical information for making its provisional approval of the gene-based vaccines, namely Pfizer’s BNT162b2 & Comirnaty, AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1-S and Moderna’s Spikevax/mRNA-1273.

This letter pertains to:

  1. Correspondence you and the TGA received that the Pfizer (and AstraZeneca and Moderna) data via the companies themselves or via the FDA was likely too limited in scope to make a proper determination of safety and efficacy.
  2. FOIA requests to the TGA with respect to reproductive toxicology issues that have been responded to late and with heavily redacted documents.
  3. FOIA request with respect to micro-RNA sequences and related molecular genetic issues as to whether the TGA had assessed these.
  4. Peer-reviewed published in vitro research that gene-based vaccine generated spike proteins can migrate into human cell nuclei to disrupt DNA repair mechanisms, and vaccine-derived RNA can be reverse transcribed with evidence pointing to possible integration of this sequence into human genome.
  5. That a release of some Pfizer data from a FOIA request to the FDA in the US indicated high adverse events reporting by 28 February 2021.
  6. Analysis of the TGA’s own Database of Adverse Events Notifications (DAEN) data and what Australian clinicians are increasingly witnessing as a high rate of injuries from these gene-based vaccines.
  7. Extrapolating from German insurance company actuarial data, backed up by multiple US insurance company actuarial data, Australia’s DAEN Covid-19 adverse event data is likely to be under-reported by 9-fold. To date, 2,422, and possibly as high as 6,501 Australians dying as results of the Covid-19 gene-based vaccines is a justifiable calculation.
  8. All-cause mortality data from official UK, EU and US databases indicate a positive correlation with the Covid-19 gene-based vaccine rollouts during 2021.
  9. US military doctors have provided data from the US military electronic medical records database (DMED) showing an almost 10-fold increase in registered diagnosis episodes since gene-based vaccines were given to personnel.
  10. German pathologists described pathological aggregates of spike proteins and lymphocyte infiltrations in inflamed organs in autopsies related to deaths post-vaccination. Has the TGA provided guidance and resources for autopsies of postvaccine deaths of Australians?
  11. Reports of inadequacies, irregularities and possible fraudulent practices in the Pfizer vaccine trial provided by whistleblowers to the BMJ.
  12. The correspondence you received concerned with lack of sufficient safety analysis for rolling out the Pfizer vaccine to Australian children, based on that FDA release of the Pfizer adverse events data, that you received prior to Christmas.
  13. The evidence that the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is milder than the average seasonal influenza virus.
  14. The evidence that the gene-based vaccines do not prevent transmission.
  15. From a modern immunological perspective, too frequent vaccinations for respiratory viruses runs the risk of desensitising the immune response to the virus and thus lead to hypoimmunity and worse illness.
  16. Anomalies being reported in vaccine vials and blood samples from an increasing number of labs and practitioners around the world are creating suspicion. These are unexpected findings and at a minimum warrant further high level investigation.
  17. Clinicians and researchers around the world have trialled various repurposed medicines and vitamins, zinc and nutritional supplements for Covid-19 with varying but often apparent success, particularly when used early and in combination. Suppression of such protocols that have long-term safety data by the TGA and AHPRA has deprived Australians of safe and possibly effective treatments.
  18. Natural immunity and safer traditional vaccines have been under-recognised.
  19. An article in the high-impact journal Nature, notes that data collection and presentation during the Covid-19 pandemic has been substandard. Thus the capacity to ‘follow the science’ has been impaired. The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) recently admitted to withholding data for allegedly politicised reasons.

Request you Immediately STOP the SAFE & EFFECTIVE Narrative

The safety signals presented by the data in this letter are of such grave concern that the normal decision would be to immediately halt the use of gene-based vaccines to the Australian public. In view of all the data presented, we request that you immediately:

  1. Withdraw any information saying these gene-based vaccines are “safe”
  2. Withdraw the gene-based vaccines availability to the general public
  3. Absolutely halt the rollout of gene-based vaccines to Australian children as a matter of urgency
  4. Provide answers to the questions raised in italics in each section below. We are also carbon copying this letter to our parliamentary representatives so the issues raised can also be addressed via ‘Questions on Notice’ and through other democratic parliamentary means.

We acknowledge that the data presented in this letter, and the opinions based on that data, contravene the narrative of “safe and effective” gene-based vaccines and the goal of vaccinating most of the population. However, the phrase “following the science”, means following the data as it comes to hand and therefore Science is about changing hypotheses, theories and conclusions in line with changing data.

Societies Group-Think

In contrast, human societies including scientific groups, are prone to adhering to dominant ‘narratives’ once they have been formed. A ‘groupthink’ can emerge, that once established can be hard to shake off. This evolutionary psychological groupthink phenomenon forms the sociological basis for Thomas Kuhn’s seminal work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

It doesn’t apply just to major scientific theories, that Kuhn was focussed upon, but also to more immediate group responses to threats such as a pandemic, when clinicians and the public anxiously want clear answers and treatments.

Fauci - Zuckerberg

The point of mentioning this, is to request that you come to what follows with a fresh perspective and open mind. In this regard we refer to a brief snippet of an interview of Dr Tony Fauci with Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg from July 2021: (01)

Prof David Healy to TGA - Manipulation of data & Conflicts

Correspondence from Professor David Healy, Canada

Did you, Professor Skerritt, receive a paper (Evidence Base and Vaccine Policy) and letter from Professor David Healy of McMaster University in Canada?

Annex A – Letter to TGA (Cover)Annex A – Letter to TGA (Cover)
Healy2 tgaAnnex B – Evidence Base and Vaccine Policy paper (14 pages)

Annex A – Letter to TGA (Cover) | Annex B – Evidence Base and Vaccine Policy paper (14 pages)

The paper and letter are attached (Annexures A & B) and were sent in mid-December. Prof Healy is an expert in lack of transparency data issues that afflict the conduct of randomised controlled trials, the governance and manipulation of data by trial sponsors, and the integrity of the medical literature, as well as what health regulatory bodies such as the FDA, MHRA, EMA and TGA are privy to or influenced by (02). Such issues are a well-known blight on medical science, that has led to initiatives such as the AllTrials campaign (03).

Prof Healy’s paper raises grave concerns about the conduct of the Pfizer trial upon which vaccine policy in Australia, including to children, is based. It calls upon the TGA to exercise greater vigilance and to pursue Pfizer for the raw data upon which TGA provisional approvals have been granted. His paper notes that without the original raw data to cross reference, manipulation to obscure harms or exaggerate benefits can result in false data being presented in Clinical Study Reports.

FOI 2289 - Pfizer Approved by TGA, Raw Patient Data Unseen

According to a FOIA request FOI 2289, the TGA acknowledges to have not obtained individual patient level data (Annexure C and Pfizer Authorized and Data Remains Unseen (04).

Annex C - FOI 2289 - TGAAnnex C - FOI 2289 - TGA
Pfizer Trial Data Remains UnseenPfizer Trial Data Remains Unseen

1 2 3 4 5

References[+]

Telegram-Channel-GetPostUpdates-Journey
@journeytoabetterlife | @JourneyBetterLifeChat | @ImportantCensoredVideos | @c19Videos
Go to top
Tags
Share the love (use discernment sharing censored topics)

Explore More: