Journey

The point you’ve raised from page four, almost similar microscopic lung inflammation was observed in both challenged control and immunized animals. Do you want to unpack that a little bit?

Well, my understanding of that when I read it was that there didn’t seem to be a lot of benefit, from the vaccine in the first place, if I read it correctly.

“I think you did. And this is in monkeys, so it’s a fairly close human analogue, and it seems to be showing that the vaccines didn’t show clinical improvement in animal studies. So why we would assume that there would be this improvement in humans is somewhat unclear.

And the other thing here is that they didn’t compare the antibody response between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, which does seem like a bit of an omission.

In terms specifically of the lung damage, there didn’t seem to be a great deal of difference between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.”

Another point I got from page five was that the antibody and T cell response that was present initially declined quite rapidly over five weeks. So, it looks like the TGA knew that this would only last for a short period of time. Is that your reading?

Yeah, that’s exactly my reading.

And, this is something else that they never made clear is that they waited three weeks to even count you as being vaccinated after you were vaccinated. So, for the first three weeks, you’re counted as unvaccinated. It leaves about two weeks of protection before its effectiveness starts to wane. ⁽⁰¹⁾

Anyway, so yet again, we go back to that initial data where there was very little difference in microscopic lung information after day eight, day nine. There’s such a short-term duration, and this is the thing: If you’ve got to take multiple shots of a vaccine to get protection, then you start bringing in other issues like immune imprinting, any impacts on your immune system if you’re constantly repeated giving it repeated exposure to the vaccine.