Pro-Vax Doctors & Virologists NOT Getting the Jab
This is a work-in-progress. Living-Document.
Part 6: Health Professionals & Virologists who are not getting the jab (and their reasons)
On this post:
- Dr. Byram Bridle – Viral Immunologist
(concern about the true efficiency of the vaccines & missing trial data)
- Dr. Peter McCullough – Cardiologist
(concern about current vaccines & suppression of effective treatments)
- Geert Vanden Bossche – Vet specialising in virology & vaccinology
(concern that mass-vaccination may breed highly infectious variants)
- Dr. Ray Sahelian, M.D. – Retired Medical Doctor
(concerned about side-effects)
- Dr. James Marcum – Cardiologist
(says COVID-19 is treatable without being vaccinated)
- Dr. Joseph Mercola – Osteopathic Physician
(concerned about corruption and the push for vaccines and suppression of alternative treatments)
- Dr. Charles D. Hoffe – Family Doctor
(concerned about side-effects)
- Dr Pierre Kory – Pulmonary and Critical Care Specialist
(more comfortable with the alternative, wants to wait for more data, concern about the suppression of effective treatments)
Dr. Byram Bridle
Dr. Bridle is an associate professor and viral immunologist in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph. His research interests include developing a better understanding of how the immune system responds to viral infections as well as designing immunotherapies for the treatment of cancers and infectious diseases.
As someone who has spent his career developing vaccines, and from a perspective of someone who has faith in vaccines (usually), this video comes with a lot of great information about his concerns about the vaccines (that are currently available), and at the time of this video (15 Feb 2021), because he is in the low-risk demographic, he would prefer natural immunity. He goes into details about how there is a concern about the true efficiency of the vaccines (that a large data set was excluded to be approved, and the efficiency could be as low as 19% – 29%), as well as standard things that never normally happen but are happening now with these latest vaccines, and the variants.
- Symposium Video @YouTube (01) (02) (03)
- 9min Podcast May 28 2021 Delivering cutting edge news about the spike proteins (04)
Dr. Peter McCullough
Dr. Peter McCullough, 57, is a Cardiologist and Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, TX. (05) He and his wife were diagnosed with COVID-19 and used the protocol of hydroxychloroquine, antibiotics, aspirin, and vitamins that he and over 20 of his colleagues have published for the early treatment of COVID-19. Here is his protocol. (06)
I’ve seen him everywhere trying to sound the alarm about the (current) vaccines and the suppression of proven treatments. He believes that COVID-19 is treatable but has been suppressed and that the way these vaccines have been rolling out is very dangerous.
Every video I watch of his rings true for me, I have the same concerns as he does, and I’m not sure which video to share, so I might have to share a few.
The shortest video is only 16minutes long (07) and covers a few of the main concerns, so this is the one I recommend watching first if you are short on time: You can also watch the full-length interview here: (08)
This next video (20mins) is his testimony to the Senate committee to call out that COVID is treatable and other issues getting the word out including social media censorship. (09).
Geert Vanden Bossche
Geert Vanden Bossche is a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine who has specialist expertise in virology and vaccinology. Geert has worked in industry in the construction of vaccines, and in the non profit sector working to bring immunity to larger numbers of people. His fear with mass-vaccination will make the virus stronger (will breed highly infectious variants.) Website (10) | References (11) | Quotes & Docs (12)
Dr. Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Dr. Ray Sahelian, M..D. is a retired medical doctor who has moved from ‘hesitant’ to no.
May 2, 2021
I Will Not Be Taking the Current Vaccines
After being in the “hesitant” category for several months I am now in the “no” category. As a retired medical doctor I have plenty of time, and a genuine fascination, to thoroughly research this topic. I have been diligently reviewing every scientific journal I can find, reading every online news article I come across, and going through countless case reports on the CDC VAERS website. I now have a clearer understanding of how these mRNA vaccines influence our immune system and organs, how they could be of benefit, and how they cause the multiple short, medium, and long term side effects.
I am now convinced that the benefits promoted by the experts on TV regarding these vaccines are less than what they promise, and the adverse reactions are more than they want us to believe. The effects of these vaccines on the human body are infinitely more complex than anyone can imagine. A million shades of grey, you may say.
He has created several articles that go into what he has researched and explaining the side-effects (13) and more. Read the rest of his article on his website. (14) (I just don’t want to copy his entire website into this post)
Dr. James Marcum
He has made a personal decision to not take the vaccine (yet). He said we need to build a strong immune system. Exercise, sleep, water, Vitamin D, minerals, eating a healthy diet, being happy, less-stress, to strengthen immune. Then, he believes in early-treatment. He said its treatable, and that even long-haulers could be prevented by early treatment. We have acquired immunity. Identifying higher-risk groups.
He also cites a study that showed that if you have a previous history of SARS-Cov-2 infection, you have a 84% lower risk of re-infection (7 months later) (17). In another study, it showed that 95% of subjects had 95% retained immune memory at ~6 months after infection. (18) Another study he looked at was another study from the first coronaviruses (SARS-CoV & MERS-CoV) where they looked at people 12 years after they had the virus and they still had T-cell immunity. (19) There is a test he did to look at antibodies and found that he had antibodies to the virus, and that because he has naturally been infected, he has antibodies to the whole virus (not just the spike protein) (20)
Website | YouTube (21)
Dr. Joseph Mercola
Dr. Joseph Mercola is an American alternative medicine proponent and osteopathic physician. He has published a number of books with his newest book being: The Truth About COVID-19 – which goes into evidence that the virus was created in a lab, for wealth transfer, that when Trump removed funding for W.H.O. it was found that the 2nd highest funding next to the United States for the World Health Organization is actually Gates.
He also says people can’t give their ‘informed consent” before taking these vaccines if they’ve only been told one side:- ‘that the vaccines are safe’ (that any narrative that questions the vaccines are being suppressed and censored), and that they’ve masterfully created scarcity to make people feel lucky if they have access to a vaccine. He estimates more people will die from the vaccine than who died from COVID-19.
Also see his related articles and videos on his website:
- The Many Ways in Which COVID Vaccines May Harm Your Health (Video & Article) (25)
- The Truth About COVID-19 (Video & Article) (26)
- If You’ve Had COVID, Please Don’t Get Vaccinated (Video & Article ) (27)
- Mass Vaccination Triggers Spike in Cases, Deaths (Video & Article) (28)
- Spike Protein Damages Vascular Cells (Video & Article) (29)
- Wuhan Lab Caught Deleting Files Proving Fauci Funding (Video & Article) (30)
- How Many Have Died From COVID Vaccines? (Video & Article) (31)
This is a video that has both Pro’s and Con’s – featuring opposing views. The first half of the video is an interview with Dr Mercola who discusses the origin of COVID-19, lockdown, great reset, and vaccine with a very different narrative than the mainstream narrative, and the 2nd half is an interview with Dr. Jeremy Kamil with the mainstream narrative.
Dr. Charles D. Hoffe
This isn’t a doctor speaking out about not taking the vaccine, but one who has serious concerns about side effects that he’s noticing in his patients who have received the vaccine. In April, he wrote to the British Columbia Provincial Health Officer stating he was “quite alarmed at the high rate of serious side effects from this novel treatment,” in reference to Moderna COVID-19 injections given to 900 mostly Indigenous people in Lytton, British Columbia.
Instead of his concerns being addressed, his allegations were dismissed by Interior Health’s Kamloops-based medical health officer Dr. Carol Fenton, who said there have been “no deaths or lasting adverse reactions” connected to any COVID-19 vaccine in BC, let alone in the Interior Health region.
In May, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia put out a warning claiming that any doctors found to “contradict public health orders and guidance” would be subject to investigation and potentially regulatory action.
You can download the Open Letters in PDF format here.
Dr. Pierre Kory
Initially he was advocating for the vaccines, and promoting Ivermectin as a “bridge” for countries waiting for a vaccine or for those who can’t get vaccinated. He and a team of frontline health professionals (who were gathering data and sharing front-line protocols based on what was working for them and in other countries) was trying to get the effective preventative and treatment protocols out to other health professionals, and was alarmed to discover their important life-saving messages were being censored and suppressed.
He and his team wrote papers and even appealed to the senate to look at the data, and naively thought that once they reviewed the data, that it would be recommended to everyone and the pandemic would be over – instead, they reviewed only a few of the trials, excluded a lot of them, and determined it wasn’t an effective treatment against COVID-19 and that it should only be used in clinical trials – effectively preventing anyone following WHO’s advice from accessing the information. Stunned, they thought they just needed to show them more data, but when they presented more data, they found more closed doors, and they are now attempting to discredit him as a ‘crank that promotes unproven treatments’, and that the only effective treatment is “getting the vaccine”.
He is fully vaccinated, his kids are fully vaccinated, but these new vaccines he hasn’t taken (yet) because he’s much more comfortable using the alternatives (Ivermectin+) and wants to see more data on these vaccines (that’s irony for you lol). Ivermectin and the other protocols work, has a long-term (40 year) safety profile, and works in all stages of COVID-19 (from prevention to treatment) and it’s being suppressed/dismissed and the vaccines are being promoted as the safer recommended choice, and something doesn’t feel right about that.
Whilst there are a lot of videos, I chose these two to include. This first one (2.5 hours), is the most recent (posted 2 days go) and goes through his mind-boggling journey with trying to get Ivermectin out to the other frontline workers – from writing the papers, to approaching the senate with the data, to being dismissed, etc. It also discussed more about how Ivermectin works, and discusses the various illogical things that are happening during this pandemic (and it’s push for people to get vaccinated as the only choice). This is my favourite “tv” right now, and even though it’s 2.5 hours long, I have downloaded it to watch over and over again.
Links mentioned in this video:
- British Ivermectin Recommendation Development group (34)
- Recommendation on the Use of Ivermectin for Covid-19 (PDF Downloads) (35)
- Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Ivermectin + Iota-Carrageenan in the Prophylaxis against COVID-19 in Health Personnel (36)
- Potential use of ivermectin for the treatment and prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Efficacy of ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2 (37)
- Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 93 studies, 55 peer reviewed, 56 with results comparing treatment and control groups (38)
- A Meta-analysis of Mortality, Need for ICU admission, Use of Mechanical Ventilation and Adverse Effects with Ivermectin Use in COVID-19 Patients (39)
- Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. American Journal of Therapeutics (40)
- Crying wolf in time of Corona: the strange case of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Is the fear of failure withholding potential life-saving treatment from clinical use? (41)
- Global trends in clinical studies of ivermectin in COVID-19. The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics (42)
The second video is shorter and I’ve transcribed the main points in another post. This is his appeal to the senate to look at the data (and this was last year before even more trial outcome data has come to light).
I am obsessed by Ivermectin and have many posts on it already including many videos and references.
See also the opposing view: Health Professionals who Support Getting the Jab