Six months safety and efficacy of Pfizer
Research funded by pharmaceutical companies claims vaccine safety
Leading medical journals have published many articles, that allegedly confirm the benefits of vaccination.
One typical example is a recently published preprint reviewing six months safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine. As it was funded by Pfizer/Biontech, involved mostly Pfizer employees, and lists a Pfizer employee as the corresponding author, the study can certainly not be called impartial.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1
Contrary to established scientific norms, the study was not double-blinded and, starting December 2020, participants were given the option of ‘unblinding’. Those in the Placebo group were offered the Pfizer shot. As a consequence, the actual follow-up period was much shorter than the six months indicated in the title (49% had <4 months post second dose), and no long-term study can be carried out in the future, due to the absence of a Placebo group.
The paper admits, that there were “imbalances in adverse events (30% vs 14%), related adverse events (24% vs 6%), and severe adverse events (1.2% vs 0.7%) between BNT162b2 and placebo groups”. However, it insists that “few participants had serious adverse events”.
As far as deaths from all causes are concerned, 15 Pfizer and 14 Placebo participants died. That the Pfizer group had one more death than the Placebo group can be a coincidence. Nevertheless, for a disease that is supposedly as deadly as Covid, we would have expected a lot more deaths among the unvaccinated than the vaccinated. It is interesting, that the most frequent cause of death was cardiac arrest, which affected 4 Pfizer participants, but only 1 member of the Placebo group.
Health authorities and politicians often refer to scientific papers, that certify high vaccine efficacy. Unfortunately, most of these studies are financed by pharmaceutical companies and it is easy for them to increase efficacy to the desired level, for instance by choosing a favorable trial design and setting convenient endpoints. It is a scandal, that pharmaceutical companies can evaluate their own products, and publish the results in leading medical journals as content, and not as advertisement.
Even if Big Pharma does not directly finance a specific study, it can exert enough pressure on scientists, for instance by threatening to withdraw funding for other projects. To expect most research papers to be impartial is naïve. (01)
See full report on Live Beyond Borders for a lot more in-depth review and references: Covid vaccines are not as safe as we are told – Sept 30, 2021 (02)
Controversy surrounding the original Pfizer Trial
A recent published paper on the first Pfizer Vaccine Trial has FINALLY awoken some of the doctors who have been calling people “antivaxxers” or “conspiracy theorists” instead of taking more of an “investigative journalistic” approach and checking their claims. See this post for full details about the original Pfizer Trial. (03)
BMJ: Unclean Data in Vaccine Trials (Pfizer & FDA should be investigated & Rollout Halted) – November 10, 2021 (04)
Pfizer Posts:
- [Prof Nazar] C19 Vaccine-Bioweapon Genocide (paper & presentation)
- [ICIC] Important Lawsuit which will investigate Pfizer (5 min summary)
- @Jikkyleaks Australian Whistleblower
- TGA: FOI 3471 & FOI 4077
- Japanese professor blows up at the Ministry of Health
- Pfizer Employees don’t get the same “fake-vaccine” as the rest of Australia
- “We’re in End Times” Dr. James Thorp (OB/GYN)
- GMO Parasite Patent’s Review (I don’t see the evidence)
- Reviewing c19=Bioweapon Patent evidence [Kingston]
- “Internet of Things” patent
- C19 Vial Contents Summary (Presentation & Paper comparing 26 Labs from 16 countries)
- Neutrophils Scratchpad
- Blank Insert Collection
- Dr Ryan Cole – no graphene or parasites in 100+ vials tested
- C19 Shots | US Senate Roundtable Highlights (Dec)
- Ursula von der Leyen
- George Christensen on Vial Contents
- [Australia] What’s In The Pfizer Vials?
- [Download] Analysis Reports (Vials, Bloodwork & Autopsies)
- Dr Yanowitz’s “Connecting the Dots” Story
- Senators Try to Wake Up the Corrupt Hive-Mind we call ‘the government’
- The Science behind the Personality Changes in the Jabbed
- All viruses & vaccines are bioterrorism? [Documentary, 2007]
- [DARPA] paid [Moderna] & [Pfizer] for mRNA research and development in 2013
- [Mike Yeadon] I’ve not been religious, but we’re in the good vs evil
- Talk.TV cuts off John Watt because she’s “Scared of Pfizer’s big pockets”
- “The Playbook” – how the few control the many [Covid Edition]
- † Another Graphene Whistleblower Found Dead
- New Boosters approved that were tested only on Mice (What happened to them?)
- Convenient Deaths or Arrests (Whistleblowers)
- Fully-Referenced Scientific Reasoning to stay away from the jabs (Letter)
- Safe And Effective: A Second Opinion (2022 Oracle Films COVID-19 Documentary)
- Truth Bombs in UK Parliament Vaccine Debate
- Magnetic Phenomenon is Real
- Aussie Media ‘Jab-Injuries’ Compilation
- Cancelling Truth (my broken link checker reveals evidence being deleted)
- Dr James Rowe | Australian pharmaceutical scientist on Toxic C19 Jab Batches
- Senator Malcolm Roberts – Covid Data Emerges & Australians want Justice
- NZ Informed Consent document
- Sudden ‘Collapsing or † Dead Entertainer’ Syndrome 2022
- 83% Deaths had 3 or more shots | Oct 2022
- Atrazine | Making Men more ‘Feminine’ (via Rain?)
- C19 Jab Contracts
- Pfizer – IBM – Collaborate – Internet of Things – 2017
- FOI: Ingredients of the ‘placebo’ in Pfizer trial [FDA]
- European COVID Commission Oct 2022
- Elites charged with buying Fake Jab & BioNTech CEO admits not jabbed
- [Italy] What’s in the Blood? 1,006 Jabbed Patients [Dark-Field Paper -Pfizer/Moderna]
- Young Global Leaders (WEF)
- Compliance Pills
I just joined Gettr and I highly recommend it - it's the best alternative to them all so far:

Telegram Channels: Get Post Updates | Chat/Comment | Video Evidence | c19 Images/Memes
Thank you to the people who donated to save the website for another year. I was so scared of losing my research. How are you guys making money now that you're aware of the slavery system? I have no idea how we will win or survive the coming days. We need to start some brainstorming sessions where people with great ideas can be heard. I can't be the only one struggling; we need to find & share ways that help all of us. I'm also sick of my site constantly going down, it's attacked, censored, and constantly running out of "web resources". I'm with inmotion but had to downgrade to shared-hosting because the world flipped-upside down and I can't figure out how to make money. But I need another solution for hosting it elsewhere; in a budget-friendly way. Has anyone come across a good way for non-narrative-friendly sites to survive, that doesn't break the bank? Please contact me if you have ideas: (email | telegram | SMS +61408036323 | gettr )
References