Journey

“The purpose of this study was to determine if there is any significant variation in batch toxicity – by counting the number of adverse reaction reports associated with each batch number.”

Some batches cause adverse reactions consistently – across every state. The highly toxic batches show increasing numbers of adverse events in every state (wherever they are deployed).

Worse – there is an obvious pattern – it seems they are “evenly distributed” between the harmless batches.

The frequency being about 1 in 200. So every 200 batches, is a “toxic batch” causing hospitalizations, disabilities, and death, across the USA – in every state.

The harmless batches are harmless, but there is 1 in 200 chance, you get a harmful batch.

Craig Paardekooper

If the separate companies were deploying high toxicity batches systematically, then the patterns of deployment could be confused and clouded by mixing data for all of the companies. So, instead of combining all of the VAERS data for Moderna, and for Pfizer, I decided to separate them out. Here is the complete output for Pfizer only – showing adverse reactions for each sequential batch.

Pfizer deployed about 9500 batches to the USA.

In the first cluster, we have 12 highly toxic batches all appearing in close temporal proximity – and all within a defined range of 2000 to 3000 x base toxicity.

In the second cluster, we have 3 highly toxic batches appearing in close temporal proximity, and within the range of 2000-2500 x base toxicity.

In the third cluster, we have 27 highly toxic batches all appearing in close temporal proximity – and all within the defined range of 1000-2000 x base toxicity.

In the fourth cluster we have 21 highly toxic batches all appearing in close temporal proximity – all within the defined range of 100-1500 x base toxicity.

If the production of toxic batches was an accident, we would expect their temporal appearance to be random and more scattered. The production of large numbers of toxic batches in close temporal proximity to one another shows that such “accidents” are repeated dozens of times, sequentially!

In addition to this, these clusters of toxic batches are separated by clear periods of harmless batches – then the sudden appearance of another cluster.

The toxic batches are also clustered into a narrow range of toxicity, rather than having a random spread of toxicity – which is odd if these batches were accidents.

Finally, the toxicity of these clusters decreases in steps, linearly over time – again, not what we would expect from the accidental production of toxic batches.

These batches may be Hot Lots by design.

Craig Paardekooper