Pfizer & BigPharma use Papers to Counteract Opposing Findings
Today my heart was broken all over again about how corrupt humanity has become after finding study after study that had clear conflicts of interest – these should have red-flashing lights and warning signs all over it – or not approved at all!
Whenever there are warnings about the vaccines, these guys just pay someone to bloody create a paper that our officials then use to keep the corrupt narrative going.
Science Journals that are funded by Big Pharma, cannot be trusted, but people keep buying into these studies as their “gold standard” to deceive the public.
I would have to download almost every journal publication to list them all – the whole thing is corrupt, but here are the ones that sparked my frustration enough today to create a post highlighting the problem.
EXPERTS SHOULD BE NEUTRAL.
WAKE UP AND SEE WHAT IS GOING ON!
The conflict$ of interest in this pandemic is really deeply disturbing and you need to break-free of your delusional mindset that just because someone says “outside the scope of this work” – doesn’t mean they are not biased or paid for a certain favourable outcome – they KNOW THE GAME – they know they have to put these pharma-giants in a favourable light regardless of their findings, their future grants, their future payments, and their career-reputation is always on the line. They don’t seem to see outside of their own wallet to see the bigger picture and realize the impacts of their papers outside of their short-term career benefit to see that the entire world is being taken over and people are being harmed because their noses are too far up the asses of these pharmaceutical criminals.
We’re not talking little crumbs here. Whilst the honest scientific data gets ignored and unpaid. If you are willing to sell your soul to the devil, you are rewarded.
If they are willing to pay $40,000 per Fact-Checker article, how much you think they pay scientists?
These are the grants the Australian Kristine Macartney got in the past couple of years. SIXTY FIVE MILLION DOLLARS. Yeah, this is the “expert” they have been pulling in for the law suits in Australia on behalf of the government. She was the NSW ‘expert witness’ we watched live for hours in the Hazzard case against mandatory vaccination, who constantly refuted the studies that proved the vaccine mandates are bullshit in favour of her own “expert opinion”. Can you trust someone that got $65,330,038 in government grants in 2020-2021 to be “NEUTRAL”?
Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data (01)
“These findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination can help to control the pandemic.”
FJA, JMM, FK, GM, KP, JS, DLS, and LJ
hold stock and stock options in Pfizer!
Association of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine With Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Workers in Israel (02)
“Among health care workers at a single center in Israel who were previously vaccinated with a 2-dose series of BNT162b2, administration of a booster dose compared with not receiving one was associated with a significantly lower rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection over a median of 39 days of follow-up”
Dr Angel reported
receiving grants from Pfizer.
Dr Ben-Ami reported
receiving personal fees from Pfizer, Gilead, Teva, and Merck.
Association Between Vaccination With BNT162b2 and Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Health Care Workers (03)
Among health care workers at a single center in Tel Aviv, Israel, receipt of the BNT162b2 vaccine compared with no vaccine was associated with a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection more than 7 days after the second dose. Findings are limited by the observational design.
Dr Angel reported
receiving research grants from Pfizer.
Dr Spitzer reported being partially supported by the Israeli Council for Higher Education via the Weizmann Data Science Research Center and by a research grant from Madame Olga Klein–Astrachan.
Dr Ben-Ami reported receiving consulting fees
from Pfizer, Gilead, and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study (04)
Our findings suggest that a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is effective in protecting individuals against severe COVID-19-related outcomes, compared with receiving only two doses at least 5 months ago.
NB, ND, and RDB report institutional grants to Clalit Research Institute from Pfizer outside the submitted work and unrelated to COVID-19, with no direct or indirect personal benefits.
MAH reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and US Department of Veterans Affairs, and personal fees from Cytel and ProPublica.
ML reports grants from Pfizer, NIH, the UK National Institute for Health Research, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Open Philanthropy Project, the Wellcome Trust, and Pfizer; personal fees from Merck, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Sanofi Pasteur, and Janssen; and unpaid advice given on Covid vaccines or vaccine studies to One Day Sooner, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and COVAXX (United Biosciences).
BYR reports grants from NIH outside the submitted work.
Polymeric and lipid nanoparticles for delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines (05)
AKB, YZ, RJS, and MMS are co-inventors on a patent resulting from this work.
Just came across this one too… “Inventors of technology think this is great” — which reminded me of the dodgy PCR-test approval – the authors of the paper that created this pandemic happened to sell the PCR equipment too? Things like this may be necessary as a “marketing tool” or “scientific findings” of their technology – but we should also be looking at all these papers who stand to benefit from what they are writing about with scrutiny instead of being donkeys believing everything they read just because it’s in a journal with a peer-review. I suggest poking your nose in the pre-print server and seeing what the honest scientists who haven’t been bought off or blocked by BigPharma have written.
Paper is basically an attack-piece on other publications that point out the causal relationship between COVID vaccinations and Myocarditis. Attacking other publications – without bringing any strong data to refute — and you get paid by Pfizer – just another “marketing ad by Pfizer” using the Science Journal Publications to do it.
- NSW fast tracks mRNA Livestock jabs
- Dr Mark Hobart explains new Australian law to control doctors for good (California is also doing this)
- WHO Immunization Agenda 2030
- Former Pfizer Staff Speak Out
- Tabletop Exercises
- Suspicious Patents
- DNA Harvesting via PCR tests?
- The Big Reset Movie (Documentary) English
- Dr Mike Yeadon – respiratory specialist – overcomes belief system about respiratory viruses
- Health Authorities using Questionable studies for their Modelling & Mandates
- HARM | PCR Test Deception [Documentary]
- Senator Rennick to Office of Gene Technology & TGA | Spike Protein
- Evidence of Pharma Corruption & “Group-Think” | Peter Parry
- 200+ Aussie Doctors Request Health Reform (AMPS Summit 2022)
- Dr Duncan Syme | Health & Govt bureaucracies have trashed principles
- Dr Robert Brennan | Pandemic Theatre of Absurdity
- TGA, FDA, EMA, MHRA: drug regulators for hire (BMJ)
- Peter Daszak
- Canadian Lawyer & Doctor on Corrupt Institutions
- Vaccination or natural immunity [Dr John Campbell]
|01||Haas EJ, Angulo FJ, McLaughlin JM, Anis E, Singer SR, Khan F, Brooks N, Smaja M, Mircus G, Pan K, Southern J, Swerdlow DL, Jodar L, Levy Y, Alroy-Preis S. Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data. Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1819-1829. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00947-8. Epub 2021 May 5. Erratum in: Lancet. 2021 Jul 17;398(10296):212. PMID: 33964222; PMCID: PMC8099315.|
|02||Spitzer A, Angel Y, Marudi O, Zeltser D, Saiag E, Goldshmidt H, Goldiner I, Stark M, Halutz O, Gamzu R, Slobodkin M, Amrami N, Feigin E, Elbaz M, Furman M, Bronstein Y, Chikly A, Eshkol A, Furer V, Mayer T, Meijer S, Melloul A, Mizrahi M, Yakubovsky M, Rosenberg D, Safir A, Spitzer L, Taleb E, Elkayam O, Silberman A, Eviatar T, Elalouf O, Levinson T, Pozyuchenko K, Itzhaki-Alfia A, Sprecher E, Ben-Ami R, Henig O. Association of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine With Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Workers in Israel. JAMA. 2022 Jan 25;327(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23641. PMID: 35006256; PMCID: PMC8749710.|
|03||Angel Y, Spitzer A, Henig O, Saiag E, Sprecher E, Padova H, Ben-Ami R. Association Between Vaccination With BNT162b2 and Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Health Care Workers. JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2457-2465. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7152. PMID: 33956048; PMCID: PMC8220476.|
|04||Barda N, Dagan N, Cohen C, Hernán MA, Lipsitch M, Kohane IS, Reis BY, Balicer RD. Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study. Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2093-2100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02249-2. Epub 2021 Oct 29. PMID: 34756184; PMCID: PMC8555967.|
|05||Blakney AK, McKay PF, Hu K, Samnuan K, Jain N, Brown A, Thomas A, Rogers P, Polra K, Sallah H, Yeow J, Zhu Y, Stevens MM, Geall A, Shattock RJ. Polymeric and lipid nanoparticles for delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines. J Control Release. 2021 Oct 10;338:201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 Aug 18. PMID: 34418521; PMCID: PMC8412240.|