Journey

Australians are on their 5th Booster

Rumble | Telegram

1.) Aussie Ad for a “Top up”
2.) Hey, you remember when the government told you to take an experimental drug?
3.) Redacted: Australia has LOST its MIND pushing boosters every 6 months ^{(01) Source: Redacted News Australia has LOST its MIND pushing boosters every 6 months https://rumble.com/v28vejn-australia-has-lost-its-mind-pushes-5th-vaccine-for-population-redacted-with.html}
4.) Paul Offit, FDA Advisory Panel “I feel very strongly about my “No” vote-—”Hell No”. ^{(02) Dr Paul Offit – Clips on Boosters https://rumble.com/v2wgclw-dr-paul-offit.html | Source: Senator Gerard Rennick, Telegram https://t.me/gerardrennick/359}
5.) Stick your boosters up your ass. ^{(03) Source Craig Kelly Telegram https://t.me/craigkelly/4296}

Hey, you remember that one time that the government like told a bunch of people to take an experimental drug and a bunch of people did and then it didn’t work? And so the government said, well, you need to do it again, and they did it again?

And then the government said, “You know what; it’s not working because other people aren’t joining the experiment,” and so, “Take it a third time,” and they took it a fucking third time?

And then they started getting mad at the people who didn’t fall for that fucking shit, you remember that?

Yeah. Tuesday was pretty fun.

Australia is on to COVID vaccine number five for those of you keeping up with the government recommendations. They will now give this to anyone who has not had a vaccine within the last six months. So they’re saying get these six months apart or if you have not had COVID in that time frame. So if you did get a COVID diagnosis, they make you wait six months from your recovery, at least, you know, they’re taking into account then your natural immunity, which is interesting because new research shows that the bivalent boosters are less effective against XBB.1.5 and we’re going to get to that in a minute, but the Australian health minister, Mark Butler, said this about this new requirement:

So that’s a little confusing. You can get any COVID booster available. They’re not picky, but they prefer the Omicron booster. That doesn’t seem very solid advice. Just get whatever. Just grab whatever it seems like. It’s like vaccine bingo. Like, okay, who’s got the Omicron variant? We got Omicron variant. Like, who’s got the Delta? You know, like, this is- Bivalent boosters.

Now, this is interesting Australia is not authorizing these for anyone under 18 because they are acknowledging that this age group is not at high risk.

I did, in fact, sort of glance through the Twitter replies to this Mark Butler, and there were a few people who are saying, why can’t we get this for five-year-olds?

And I’m like—uh, because read—that’s why. “Read a little bit about that. “

Now, Australia will roll out this fifth booster. Even though news reports are that “Nearly a fifth of Australia’s Covid vaccine stock binned“, that’s the word for thrown in the trash, “amid warnings of a fresh wave of cases.” ^{(05)Nearly a fifth of Australia’s Covid vaccine stock binned amid warning of fresh wave of cases https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/oct/11/nearly-a-fifth-of-australias-covid-vaccine-stock-binned-amid-warning-of-fresh-wave-of-cases … Click for full citation}

So this is showing that the country threw out almost 20% of its COVID vaccines last fall because they expired because people just didn’t want them. They just sat there until their expiration dates. Only 40% of the population had a fourth booster compared to 95% of the Australian population that had the first full dose. So you can see demand really waning, that’s less than half, that got their first full dosage of the post- of the COVID vaccine, but that won’t stop the government from buying up the vaccines clearly. Butler said that Australia already has 4 million Omicron boosters and has ordered 10 million more.

The pharmaceuticals don’t care if they end up in the trash or not because they’re paid for. It will care if you throw them out or not, it doesn’t really matter. Who cares what you do with them, right?

Now about these bivalent boosters.

A new study shows that they do not provide lasting immunity and are especially ineffective to the XBB.1.5 variant. This study was published in January, but it is still awaiting peer review, but it features researchers from Harvard Center for Virology and Vaccine Research ^{(06)Corresponding author: Dan H. Barouch, M.D., Ph.D., Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, 330 Brookline Avenue, E/CLS-1043, Boston, MA 02115; Telephone: 617-735-4485; Fax: 617-735-4566; Email: dbarouch@bidmc.harvard.edu … Click for full citation} as well as researchers from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston ^{(07)Lasrado N, Collier AY, Miller J, Hachmann NP, Liu J, Sciacca M, Wu C, Anand T, Bondzie EA, Fisher JL, Mazurek CR, Patio RC, Powers O, Rodrigues SL, Rowe M, Surve N, Ty DM, Korber B, Barouch DH. Waning Immunity Against XBB.1.5 Following Bivalent mRNA … Click for full citation}

Here’s the title page of the study in case you want to find it yourself. I always like to give you the title page in case you want to just go Google it and share it with your friends. It’s called Waning Immunity Against XBB.1.5 Following Bivalent mRNA Boosters, because I do know that a lot of you watch this show and then you repeat some of this to your friends and you need links at the ready to prove that we’re not talking nonsense. I see you. I get it.

So here is the title page and here is the abstract telling us that what they did was test antibodies for people who received the bi-valent boosters and found that their levels of antibodies were about what they were either before the booster or within just three months. You see the conclusion there by month three, these markers declined essentially to baseline levels prior to boosting, and so, okay, that’s interesting.

Does that mean we will need boosters every three months, if the CDC gets its hands on this?

Here is what one of the head researchers told to the Epoch Times says: ^{(08) Bivalent COVID Vaccines Perform Worse Against Variant Now Dominant in United States: Studies https://archive.is/J0He6}

• So this follows many other such studies that we have reported here, such as studies out of China showing that XBB.1.5, can evade protection. ^{(09)Yue C, Song W, Wang L, Jian F, Chen X, Gao F, Shen Z, Wang Y, Wang X, Cao Y. ACE2 binding and antibody evasion in enhanced transmissibility of XBB.1.5. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;23(3):278-280. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00010-5. Epub 2023 Feb 3. … Click for full citation}
• Claims out of New York, the Public Health Center of New York City, showing that people who are vaccinated may actually be more likely to contract COVID. “New York City health officials warn that the latest Omicron subvariant that is making up the majority of COVID-19 cases may be more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated than previous variants.” ^{(10) Latest coronavirus variant more likely to infect people who have been vaccinated — January 13, 2023 https://www.fox5ny.com/news/coronavirus-people-vaccinated}
• see also: Apr 19 2023 New COVID-19 Vaccines Don’t Protect Well Against Hospitalization: CDC Data ^{(11) New COVID-19 Vaccines Don’t Protect Well Against Hospitalization: CDC Data https://archive.is/FIDDv}
• see also: “The Pfizer internal documents reveal that a month after the COVID vaccine rollout, November 2020, that the vaccines were not effective – the third most common “side-effect” of Pfizer was COVID” ^{(12) What Your Doctor Won’t Tell You About The Pfizer Docs https://pennybutler.com/pfizer-data-dump-summary/}

We covered both of those when they came out. So it’s interesting that we’re showing the lack of efficacy of this vaccine, yet more vaccines—and my worry is that the CDC will say, “Oh, vaccines wane after three months. Now we don’t just need them once a year. Now we don’t need them just every six months. We better just be taking them every three months, because the immunity is not sticking around.”

Even though we know that XBB.1.5 is the dominant variant that’s circulating on the globe (really, are you sure that’s not just $cience propaganda? ~ Penny), and that the bivalent booster is for BA4 and BA5. So that’s not even that same strain, but sure, go ahead, Australia. Order 10 million more. Why not? You get a booster. You get a booster. Just use up the taxpayer money. Get them.

And Australia, of course, has been really clamping down on free speech. Censorship and has been one of the most active countries around the suppression of information and data around this.

And you have in the United States today this Twitter hearing, you have Representative Nancy Mace, who admitted during congressional testimony. She said after taking the vaccine, she admitted that she now has asthma, and she has chronic pain as a result, and she said, you know, to be able to talk about this on social media, we were suppressed. We were hit. You were not allowed to talk about this. You were blocked, you were banned, you were suppressed, and it could have prevented other people from having the same pain. Same experience. If we were allowed to talk about it.

Congresswoman Nancy Mace Addresses Twitter Censorship

Rumble – 2 Min Clip | YouTube – 5 Min Clip ^{(13) 2 Min Clip: https://rumble.com/v2wn4go-congresswoman-nancy-mace-addresses-twitter-censorship.html Watch full 5 minutes: Congresswoman Nancy Mace Addresses Twitter Censorship https://youtu.be/C0ME1Mx50gQ}

“And the Twitter files were not just about Hunter Biden‘s laptop. Twitter files make it apparent Twitter worked over time to suppress accurate COVID information. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is a professor of medicine at Stanford who once tweeted an article he wrote about natural immunity. Thanks to Elon Musk’s release of the Twitter files, we learned some of his tweets were tagged with the label of Trends Blacklist.

Apparently the views of a Stanford doctor are disinformation to you people. I along with many Americans have long term effects from COVID. Not only was I a long hauler, but I have effects from the vaccine. It wasn’t the first shot, but it was the second shot that I now developed asthma that has never gone away since I had the second shot. I have tremors in my left hand, and I have the occasional heart pain that no doctor can explain, and I’ve had a battery of tests.

I find it extremely alarming. Twitter’s unfettered censorship spread into medical fields and affected millions of Americans by suppressing expert opinions from doctors and censoring those who disagree with the CDC.

I have great regrets about getting the shot because of the health issues that I now have that I don’t think are ever going to go away, and I know that I’m not the only American who has those kinds of concerns.

Another example of what Twitter has done to censor folks is from Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Harvard educated epidemiologist who once tweeted, “COVID vaccines are important for high-risk people and their caretakers, those with prior natural infection do not need it, nor children.”

The Twitter files reveal this tweet was deemed false information because it ran contrary to the CDC. So my first question this morning of Ms Gadde, may ask of you, “Where did you go to medical school?”

I did not go to medical school.

I’m sorry?

I did not go to medical school.

That’s what I thought. “Why do you think you or anyone else at Twitter have the medical expertise to censor a doctor’s expert opinion?”

Our policies regarding COVID were designed to protect individuals.

You guys censored Harvard-educated doctors, Stanford-educated doctors, doctors who were educated at the best places in the world, and you silenced those voices.”

“What makes you think you or anyone else at Twitter have the medical expertise to censor actual, accurate CDC data? This is what Twitter did: they labelled this as ‘inaccurate’ – it’s the government’s own data, and it’s ridiculous that we’re having to have this conversation today.”

Dr Paul Offit – Clips on Boosters

Dr Paul Offit (FDA Advisory Board, director of the Vaccine Education Center at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.)

NBC Philadelphia: […] And there’s no public data on that yet. What’s more, for these fall booster shots, the FDA is not consulting with Dr. Offit and the rest of the independent vaccine advisory committee.