Ralph Baric

IN CONflict$
  • Updated:1 year ago
  • Reading Time:21Minutes
  • Post Words:5520Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Vladimir Zev Zelenko MD just posted a dated-list of research that was mostly done by Dr Ralph Baric and funded by the US government to do with the bioweapon.

I already have several posts that mention Dr Ralph Baric’s role in the pandemic and maybe I should have a dedicated post to lay out what we know to try and sort through misinformation vs truth.

Is his role just a money-making role and the lab-leak theory just a smoke-screen to get governments to hand-over all their money and scare people, or is there actually a bioweapon (whether it’s SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein, the “upload to the gene-bank”, the “reagents”, the fraudulent science narrative… or some other poison, etc.).

Some say that he is the creator of the “bioweapon”, but there’s so much we don’t know. There’s also the history of the NIH CDC WHO and other BigPharma-controlled corporation that make their name and fortunes out of pandemics & public health scares, so just having the narrative of a “pandemic” is enough to get them super-rich – no virus necessary if you can control the narrative & control world-wide government spending in “global health” decisions.

So will just collate what we have and see where we end up at the end of all this.

First posted: .May 6, 2022 | Last Updated: March 26, 2023

Not one of the 'Good Guys'....

Certainly pretty suspicious:

  • he makes millions weaponizing and modifying coronaviruses with both US govt support along with the same Wuhan lab that SARS-CoV-2 is suspected to have originated from
  • is the inventor of a patent in 2018 for ‘Methods and compositions for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins’
  • that he did a presentation that same year featuring “How to make money in the next Pandemic”…

Amongst all the other research and connections, he’s definitely not one of the “good guys”…

… but I’m still not sure if there’s a “coronavirus bioweapon” – ie.. still not really on board with the whole narrative being that it was all a little bit too obvious and all the research and money trails and connections were too easy to find…

And I’m wondering, since this “agenda” was so carefully and meticulously planned & practiced over many decades whether having something this obvious was just an intentional way to get the entire global governments on board to agree to handing over billions as well as initiating lockdowns, and emergency-use only approval for these experimental – way more scarier than the virus – injections, tests, ventilators, drugs, & vaccine-passports…

Let alone… installing a totalitarian big-tech global surveillance system in every town and city along with forcing the closure of schools, separating families, ruining lives, euthanizing the elderly, traumatizing the entire world, destroying businesses, causing mass starvation and unemployment, digitalizing all of humanity, building quarantine camps, stopping world travel, etc. –

Like, to get all the members of govt’s and massive corporations on board, not only would you have to infiltrate the key positions (which they did), you would need more than just yellow-envelopes full of money to the key players to convince all the committees & leaders in millions of businesses (those “not part of the plan” etc)..to get on board – and the Wuhan “leak” was a hypothesis used at the start of the pandemic until it was stamped upon, and then re-opened again, it’s kind of like they are using the narrative for their own benefit and shutting-it down when convenient.

Anyway, something “big” would’ve been needed for these massive changes to happen quickly all over the world… and a brilliant narrative would be the threat to wipe-out humanity from a “bioweapons lab in China” – something all governments had already anticipated and planned for, planned budgets, staff, processes and laws – you name it, many things had already been put in place years before.

I think these people have been seeding a “pandemic” for this totalitarian-result for many, many years. And something big was needed to convince all to completely destroy their economies & all freedoms and – so “big threatening events” have “instant methods” that are ready to go and just enact automatically with just a pen…).

Ralph Baric Patent 'Methods and compositions for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins' 2018

Patent US9884895B2 – Methods and compositions for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins – Ralph Baric – Filed 2014. Granted 2018. (01) (02)

Ralph Baric 'How to Make Money in the Next Pandemic and Trick people into taking the jabs' 2018

Ralph Baric advised attendees how to “make money” in the “next pandemic” – 2018

While speaking at a symposium in 2018, Wuhan lab-linked and gain-of-function advocate Dr. Ralph Baric advised attendees on how to “make money” in the “next pandemic” (04)

  1. Slides titled “Global catastrophe: opportunities exist
  2. Pandemics are times of opportunity
  3. Invest in “masks” and “companies that make antiviral drugs

Bat Coronaviruses lab-designed to infect humans

From Zev Zelenko:

Bat Coronavirus’s were custom designed to infect human beings. Most of the research was done by Dr. Ralph Baric and funded by the US government. (05)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9782262/ (06)
Hensley LE, Holmes KV, Beauchemin N, Baric RS.
Virus-receptor interactions and interspecies transfer of a mouse hepatitis virus.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9782263/ (07)
Hensley LE, Baric RS.
Human biliary glycoproteins function as receptors for interspecies transfer of mouse hepatitis virus.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9847369/ (08)
Baric RS, Sullivan E, Hensley L, Yount B, Chen W.
Persistent infection promotes cross-species transmissibility of mouse hepatitis virus.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19036930/ (09)
Becker MM, Graham RL, Donaldson EF, Rockx B, Sims AC, Sheahan T, Pickles RJ, Corti D, Johnston RE, Baric RS, Denison MR.
Synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19906932/ (10)
Graham RL, Baric RS.
Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24667706/ (11)
Agnihothram S, Yount BL Jr, Donaldson EF, Huynh J, Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Graham RL, Becker MM, Tomar S, Scobey TD, Osswald HL, Whitmore A, Gopal R, Ghosh AK, Mesecar A, Zambon M, Heise M, Denison MR, Baric RS.
A mouse model for Betacoronavirus subgroup 2c using a bat coronavirus strain HKU5 variant

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25114257/ (12)
Yang Y, Du L, Liu C, Wang L, Ma C, Tang J, Baric RS, Jiang S, Li F.
Receptor usage and cell entry of bat coronavirus HKU4 provide insight into bat-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26063432/ (13)
Yang Y, Liu C, Du L, Jiang S, Shi Z, Baric RS, Li F.
Two Mutations Were Critical for Bat-to-Human Transmission of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26552008/ (14)
Menachery VD, Yount BL Jr, Debbink K, Agnihothram S, Gralinski LE, Plante JA, Graham RL, Scobey T, Ge XY, Donaldson EF, Randell SH, Lanzavecchia A, Marasco WA, Shi ZL, Baric RS.
A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.

Covid-19 Lab-Designed to Destroy Human Lung Tissue

From Zev Zelenko:

Covid-19 was custom designed to destroy human lung tissue. Most of the research was done by Dr. Ralph Baric and funded by the US government. (15)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1149438/ (16)
Baric, Ralph S, and Amy C Sims. “Humanized mice develop coronavirus respiratory disease.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16306622/ (17)
Sims AC, Baric RS, Yount B, Burkett SE, Collins PL, Pickles RJ.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection of human ciliated airway epithelia: role of ciliated cells in viral spread in the conducting airways of the lungs.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124135/?report=reader (18)
Sims, Amy C et al. “SARS CoV replication and pathogenesis in human airway epithelial cultures.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19153232/ (19)
Miknis ZJ, Donaldson EF, Umland TC, Rimmer RA, Baric RS, Schultz LW.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp9 dimerization is essential for efficient viral growth.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23365422/ (20)
Sims AC, Tilton SC, Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Schäfer A, Matzke MM, Webb-Robertson BJ, Chang J, Luna ML, Long CE, Shukla AK, Bankhead AR 3rd, Burkett SE, Zornetzer G, Tseng CT, Metz TO, Pickles R, McWeeney S, Smith RD, Katze MG, Waters KM, Baric RS.
Release of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nuclear import block enhances host transcription in human lung cells.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23919993/ (21)
Gralinski LE, Bankhead A 3rd, Jeng S, Menachery VD, Proll S, Belisle SE, Matzke M, Webb-Robertson BJ, Luna ML, Shukla AK, Ferris MT, Bolles M, Chang J, Aicher L, Waters KM, Smith RD, Metz TO, Law GL, Katze MG, McWeeney S, Baric RS.
Mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-induced acute lung injury.

The vaccine and the virus were made by the same people.

From COVID-19 Spartacus Letter

The vaccine and the virus were made by the same people.

In 2014, there was a moratorium on SARS gain-of-function research that lasted until 2017. This research was not halted. Instead, it was outsourced, with the federal grants being laundered through NGOs. Ralph Baric is a virologist and SARS expert at UNC Chapel Hill in North Carolina. This is who Anthony Fauci was referring to when he insisted, before Congress, that if any gain-of-function research was being conducted, it was being conducted in North Carolina.

This was a lie. Anthony Fauci lied before Congress. A felony.

Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli are colleagues and have co-written papers together. Ralph Baric mentored Shi Zhengli in his gain-of-function manipulation techniques, particularly serial passage, which results in a virus that appears as if it originated naturally. In other words, deniable bioweapons. Serial passage in humanized hACE2 mice may have produced something like SARS-CoV-2.

The funding for the gain-of-function research being conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology came from Peter Daszak. Peter Daszak runs an NGO called EcoHealth Alliance. EcoHealth Alliance received millions of dollars in grant money from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (that is, Anthony Fauci), the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (part of the US Department of Defense), and the United States Agency for International Development. NIH/NIAID contributed a few million dollars, and DTRA and USAID each contributed tens of millions of dollars towards this research. Altogether, it was over a hundred million dollars.

EcoHealth Alliance subcontracted these grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab in China with a very questionable safety record and poorly trained staff, so that they could conduct gain-of-function research, not in their fancy P4 lab, but in a level-2 lab where technicians wore nothing more sophisticated than perhaps a hairnet, latex gloves, and a surgical mask, instead of the bubble suits used when working with dangerous viruses.

Chinese scientists in Wuhan reported being routinely bitten and urinated on by laboratory animals. Why anyone would outsource this dangerous and delicate work to the People’s Republic of China, a country infamous for industrial accidents and massive explosions that have claimed hundreds of lives, is completely beyond me, unless the aim was to start a pandemic on purpose.

In November of 2019, three technicians at the Wuhan Institute of Virology developed symptoms consistent with a flu-like illness. Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, and Ralph Baric knew at once what had happened, because back channels exist between this laboratory and our scientists and officials.

December 12th, 2019, Ralph Baric signed a Material Transfer Agreement (essentially, an NDA) to receive Coronavirus mRNA vaccine-related materials co-owned by Moderna and NIH.

It wasn’t until a whole month later, on January 11th, 2020, that China allegedly sent us the sequence to what would become known as SARS-CoV-2.

Moderna claims, rather absurdly, that they developed a working vaccine from this sequence in under 48 hours.

Stéphane Bancel, the current CEO of Moderna, was formerly the CEO of bioMérieux, a French multinational corporation specializing in medical diagnostic tech, founded by one Alain Mérieux. Alain Mérieux was one of the individuals who was instrumental in the construction of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 lab.

The sequence given as the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2, RaTG13, is not a real virus. It is a forgery. It was made by entering a gene sequence by hand into a database, to create a cover story for the existence of SARS-CoV-2, which is very likely a gain-of-function chimera produced at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was either leaked by accident or intentionally released. For a virus as significant as RaTG13 appears to be to lie fallow for the better part of a decade with no research papers acknowledging its existence at all is an absurdity.

The animal reservoir of SARS-CoV-2 has never been found.

26 of the 27 people involved in penning the Lancet letter decrying the lab leak were connected directly to researchers linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a massive conflict of interest.

One of those was Peter Daszak himself, who was also a WHO investigator on the ground in Wuhan, and also served as a Facebook fact-checker. Peter Daszak and Aleksei Chmura penned an absolutely psychotic letter about animal reservoirs of viruses in 2008. Aleksei Chmura, for his part, was directly involved in capturing bats and collecting samples from them.

Dr. David E. Martin showed, beyond a shadow of a doubt, with his research into biotech patents with his company, M-CAM, that literally every aspect of SARS and its variations are patented technologies. The government response to the pandemic has varied from the farcical to the downright criminal: Residents in Wuhan were welded inside their apartments by the authorities to enforce a quarantine. In New York, sick COVID-19 patients were transferred into nursing homes to keep them out of hospitals, resulting in thousands of elderly and vulnerable people dying of COVID-19 due to nosocomial infections.

While the COVID-19 outbreak ravaged Wuhan, officials in the US completely dropped the ball by failing to stockpile N95 masks and other equipment for healthcare workers, leaving them short on supplies. Many masks sat unused in warehouses. Companies in the US offered to manufacture masks locally, but were rebuffed by the government.

Fearing a run on masks, Anthony Fauci deliberately misinformed the public by claiming that N95 masks have no utility against the virus whatsoever, even though their performance is fair, albeit inferior to a proper respirator.

COVID-19 has been diagnosed with PCR tests with extremely high cycle thresholds. A PCR test cannot actually diagnose an infection. All a PCR test indicates is that a targeted amino acid sequence is present in a sample, indicating that something like a fragment of a virus might exist in a person. A cycle threshold of 40 or greater being used to diagnose a viral infection is fraudulent. The sample is amplified over a trillion times. The targeted AA sequence could appear in practically any organic sample, at that rate. The false positive rate would be enormous.

The CDC quietly reduced the Ct to 28 after people started getting vaccinated for COVID-19. This would show a high rate of false negatives, thus causing the vaccine to appear more effective than it really is. In essence, the apparent rate of COVID-19 infections can be adjusted by the authorities by altering the sensitivity of tests.

The FBI raided Allure Medical in Shelby Township north of Detroit for billing insurance for “fraudulent COVID-19 cures”. The treatment they were using was Intravenous Vitamin C. An antioxidant. Which, as described above, is an entirely valid treatment for COVID-19-induced sepsis, and indeed, is now part of the MATH+ protocol advanced by Dr. Paul E. Marik.

The FDA banned ranitidine (Zantac) due to supposed NDMA (N-nitrosodimethylamine) contamination.

Ranitidine is not only an H2 blocker used as antacid, but also has a powerful antioxidant effect, scavenging hydroxyl radicals. This gives it utility in treating COVID-19.

The FDA also attempted to take N-acetylcysteine, a harmless amino acid supplement and antioxidant, off the shelves, compelling Amazon to remove it from their online storefront.

This leaves us with a chilling question: did the FDA knowingly suppress antioxidants useful for treating COVID-19 sepsis as part of a willful criminal conspiracy against the American public?

The lab leak theory has been suppressed because pulling that thread leads one to inevitably conclude that there is enough circumstantial evidence to link Moderna, the NIH, the WIV, and both the vaccine and the virus’s creation together. In a sane world, this would have immediately led to the world’s biggest RICO and mass murder case. Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, Shi Zhengli, and Stéphane Bancel, and their accomplices, would have been indicted and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Instead, billions of our tax dollars were awarded to the perpetrators.

This is not a conspiracy “theory”. It is an actual criminal conspiracy, in which people connected to the development of Moderna’s mRNA-1273 are directly connected to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their gain-of-function research by very few degrees of separation, if any. The paper trail is well-established. The establishment is cooperating with, and facilitating, the worst criminals in human history, and are actively suppressing non-vaccine treatments and therapies in order to compel us to inject these criminals’ products into our bodiesThis is absolutely unacceptable.

My Pandemic Timeline

From My Pandemic Timeline (I’ll go over this tomorrow, just thought I’d quickly copy/paste from my research from the first year of the pandemic)

NOV 2015

  • Nov 9 LAB Evidence
    The bat coronavirus RaTG13 has two rare, Esp3I restriction sites strategically located to permit insertion of a genetic sequence that codes for the unique features of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein, its receptor binding contact amino acids and its polybasic (furin) cleavage site, using the ‘No See ‘Em’ synthetic biology techniques. (22)

This specific synthetic biology laboratory technique has been successfully performed previously by Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists to increase coronavirus infectivity. The probability these two sites are present and in their exact location in RaTG13 by an act of nature is one in a billion.

DEC 2015

This evidence is necessary for a laboratory origin hypothesis in which genetic manipulation to create CoV-2 is a precursor to a laboratory accident: (24)

DEC 2019

  • Dec 9 LAB3 Daszak Baric Batwoman NIH WIV
    3 weeks before Wuhan announced an outbreak of a new form of pneumonia, virologist Vincent Racaniello interviewed British zoologist and president of EcoHealth Alliance Peter Daszak about his work at the nonprofit to protect the world from the emergence of new diseases and predict pandemics. (30)

The video interview was originally filmed on December 9, 2019.

Since 2014, Daszak’s organization has received millions of dollars of funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which it has funnelled to the WIV to carry out research on bat coronaviruses.

In the first phase of research, which took place from 2014 to 2019, Daszak coordinated with Shi Zhengli, (石正麗), “BatWoman,” at the WIV on investigating and cataloguing bat coronaviruses across China.

EcoHealth Alliance received US$3.7 million in funding from the NIH for this research and 10 percent was channelled to the WIV, reported NPR.

The second, more dangerous phase, which started in 2019, involved gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses and chimeras in humanized mice from the lab of Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina.

Funding for the program was withdrawn by the NIH under the Trump administration on April 27 amid the pandemic. At the 28:10 mark of the podcast interview, Daszak states that researchers found that SARS likely originated from bats and then set out to find more SARS-related coronaviruses, eventually finding over 100. He observed that some coronaviruses can “get into human cells in the lab,” and others can cause SARS disease in “humanized mouse models.”

He warned that such coronaviruses are “untreatable with therapeutic monoclonals [antibodies] and you can’t vaccinate against them with a vaccine.” Ironically, he claims that his team’s goal was trying to find the next “spill over event” that could cause the next pandemic, mere weeks before cases of COVID-19 were beginning to be reported in Wuhan.

Daszak at the 29:54 mark appears to reveal that the goal of the GoF experiments was to develop a pan-coronavirus vaccine for many different types of coronaviruses.

Based on his response, it is evident that just before the start of the pandemic, the WIV was modifying coronaviruses in the lab. “You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily.” What he then mentioned has become the tell-tale trait of SARS-CoV-2, its spike protein: “Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus, zoonotic risk.

Daszak mentions the WIV’s collaboration with Baric: “and we work with Ralph Baric at UNC [University of North Carolina] to do this.” As has been suggested by proponents that SARS-CoV-2 is a chimera made in a lab, he speaks of inserting the spike protein “into a backbone of another virus” and then doing “some work in the lab.”

These experiments appeared to have included infecting mice genetically modified to express the human ACE2 protein with these chimeras. (31)

Fauci NIH Baric

From “Time For The Truth On The Presence Of Graphene In The Shots

The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08, issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same.  (32)

As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit. (Source: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 2000) In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full-length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.

2002 Baric Invented the weapon that became SARS

How to “dial up” a pandemic?

Dr. David Martin Details the Eye-Opening Patent for a ‘Weapon’ That Preceded SARS-CoV-1

March 17, 2023 Livestream. Rumble-clip-1 | Rumble-clip-2 | Full Interview

• In the spring of 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill filed a patent on what was called an “infectious replication defective clone” of Coronavirus. That means it’s not coming from nature — and this was months before the emergence of SARS-CoV-1.

• Coronavirus used to be a disease that inflicted gastrointestinal problems, but it became something that targeted the heart and lungs.

• Dr. David Martin argues, “We invented the weapon that became SARS that never came from an animal, never came from some sort of transfection across or transmutation from a zoonotic source. This was humans building a weapon where we’re turning biology against humanity.”

2003 CDC Patents Coronavirus

The SARS Patent Coup Explained – Dr. David Martin

Rumble-Clip-1 | State of the Nation article | Testimony to GrandJury

CDC…the Truth Virus (explains how CDC got around the Patent laws to overtake coronaviru$)

14 Mar 2023 YouTube

See also:


Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.