NZ C19-Vax Massacre Data [Liz Gunn]
- Updated:3 months ago
- Reading Time:23Minutes
- Post Words:5791Words
New Zealand Ministry of Death update: NZ Mortality rates per vaccinator and per vaccine centre prove beyond doubt that the vaccines are the cause for the excess deaths. Vaccinator’s may not even know. Update: Police have arrested Whistleblower.
NZ’s COVID Vaccine Massacre Exposed | M.O.A.R (Mother Of All Revelations)
- In just one particular vaccination centre in Invercargill, 51 people were vaccinated within the space of just two hours. All 51 are now dead.
- Out of the 837 people who were vaccinated at another vaccination centre, 253 of them are now dead. 30% of everyone who was vaccinated at that centre are now dead.
- At another vaccination centre, of the 923 people vaccinated there, 276 are now dead.
There were numerous vaccination centres around the country that had mortality rates at this sort of level of 30%. This is compared to the normal average mortality rate of just 0.75%, which is what we should be seeing.
The data also shows how many fatalities were linked to each individual vaccinator:
- One vaccinator had a mortality rate of 25%.
- One in four people that got the vaccine from that vaccinator is now dead.
- Other vaccinators were similar. Their vaccine batches were literally death batches.
These numbers are simply off the scale and impossible to interpret any other way than a vaccine massacre.
Selected Quotes from Interview:
I’m Liz Gunn and I come from a background as a lawyer and then years in mainstream media. I now do freelance media and I stood in the recent election in New Zealand. As part of my standing in that election, a man approached me and asked me if I would talk about with him some statistics, some data, a large body of data that he was brave enough to come forward and offer in order to help the world. I can tell you that I have never worked on such a detailed case. I have never worked on such a demanding story in all my years in both law and media as this one. It has demanded fastidious attention to detail and we have taken it to statisticians here in New Zealand and elsewhere around the world. There is a purpose to this. The purpose is to bring down the greatest evil, I believe, that has been perpetrated on the most human beings around the world at the same time. To that end, I cannot put into words the courage of this man whom I will now introduce. He’s willing to have his face on screen. I have always referred to him by his nickname, which is, ironically, Winston Smith. I do not know his real name and I’m happy with that.
Well, sometimes it’s harder to look than to leap, and basically, I saw too much that I couldn’t do nothing anymore, and someone said that bad things happen when good people do nothing, and that was obvious during World War II when Germany went and killed millions of innocent people. We know that they’re not all bad people. Germans are not all bad people. So there were good people. They just followed orders. They were just told what to do and just went along with it. Bad things happen when good people do nothing.
Exactly. Yeah. So this is one of the reasons why this is happening now is because good people are not doing enough to stop it. So we are as humans. We are one of the universe’s most treasured creations. We are each one of us incredibly, incredibly unique and rare. There’s every chance of us being here is 400 trillion to one, each one of us.
The universe is a beautiful, beautiful thing, and to enjoy it, to live life is, yeah, it’s a gift that we’ve got to enjoy. So we can’t, we can’t do this. We can’t keep doing this. It’s, it’s too much.
That’s a human life. So I know a database administrator, I’ve been one for 20 years. So it’s just letters and numbers. I know that, right? It’s just data. This is different. It’s because we’re seeing human lives being destroyed, and the families that come up this data is a river of tears, and I feel the pain. So I can’t go on with it. There is so much pain and tears in this that it’s just let’s go to end, and I’m going to prove that it is the vaccine that’s killing people. It’s got to be. It’s nothing else. There’s no other reason for it, and they might claim that it could be any number of different causes. Anything that could say it’s the age in population or whatever. It’s not. This thing is a killer, and we have the statistical evidence of that.
Well, I was involved with building a project that helped with implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It’s called a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get a payment for it as a provider, and I helped build it. I implemented it, and when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates of death. People dying within a week have been vaccinated.
So what did you notice when you first started to look at this data as you were building it?
Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that people were dying almost straight away after being injected. So that sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper.
I helped build a vaccination system. So there’s no way I’m anti-vaxx, but I am pro-choice, and I do believe in fundamental freedoms of humans, and that we should not have a procedure forced onto us because of a mandate just to keep our jobs. That is against everything I stand for. That is a huge overreach by the government, and I was not happy with that. I was absolutely not happy with that.
We say, okay, if you want to keep your job, if you want to survive, if you want to go on holiday, if you want to go to the movies, if you want to do anything, live your life, you’ve got to have this procedure and a vaccine pass to just to let you in.
If you’re young and you want to go to university, if you want to go to a music festival, for the rest of your life, you must do what we want.
Exactly. So this is against everything that I thought the Western civilization was about. The freedoms that we just naturally take for granted. It’s like the last two years have been absolutely nightmare. We’ve just gone back to 1984. You know, it’s like living in an Orwellian nightmare. For the last two years, like literally, I could not believe what came out. The vax pass, the mandates, the lockdowns, and freedom of information—anyone who had a different opinion, anyone who said, hang on a minute, this is not quite right. We shut down. It’s saying, this is insane. Where is the freedom of debate? Why can’t we talk about it?
And we all know here in New Zealand, our prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, who said, we are your one source of truth. If that isn’t Orwellian, I don’t know what it is.
Awake is like, you kind of know that when you’re being lied to, and I think I’m going to, I’m hopefully going to show people how they’ve been lied to in this, and yeah, they are. So I just need people to be skeptical, and even if you’re being jabbed a dozen times, it doesn’t matter. Just look at this data. Just look to see what it says, and that’s from a purely statistical scientific standpoint. This is real hard data. It’s undeniable data. It’s the government’s own data. They can’t deny it. It’s a hundred percent, and so what I did was looking at it, looking at our government’s data that we record on births and deaths. I was just curious to see if the death rate was going up, and sure enough it was.
You know, just like everyone else was saying on YouTube in that, there were all these reports coming out saying, oh, death rate is going to six, seven percent in some countries. So I thought, okay, maybe it’s easier on the same, and I’ve got access to that data, and I ran some queries, and yeah, sure enough it was.
Well, that’s what science is all about. It’s, you put a theory, a hypothesis up there, and you invite criticism. You want to be shown that it’s wrong. God, I wish to my heart that this wasn’t a thing. I wish it wasn’t what it is.
Yes. I think we both do. It’s horrific.
It’s horrific. It’s been a terrible nightmare.
So what we have here are the 20 worst sites for excess deaths. That means excess mortality. So of the sites in New Zealand, there are 1391 individual vaccination sites, and we’re looking at the mortality rates of each site.
10 of worst sites are in Christchurch alone.
Invercargill had an unbelievable experience. They’ve had a total number of site vaccinations of 837 and a 30 percent death rate. 30 percent. So almost one in three people who were vaccinated at this site are now dead.
The underlying mortality rate should be 0.75 percent ordinarily, but in this one particular site, we’ve got an, an mortality rate of 30 percent.
That is staggering.
We have this LaHood’s pharmacy here. They’ve vaccinated 16 people and almost 20 percent—one in five of them are now dead.
I can only guess at this point, but the statistics are clearly saying that there is something wrong and it’s concentrated in the South Island, that their mortality rates are far in excess of what is normal, far in excess.
So we get back to the crucial point of, of your data to me still, Winston, is this is proving that this is not able any longer to be put down to natural causes.
This cannot be a natural event. This is man made. It’s undeniable. It’s binary. It’s you are alive or dead, one or zero.
It’s very, very difficult for them to disprove this because as I will show you, stats don’t lie, and this is government data.
And we don’t know the government collection of adverse events data because many people I’ve interviewed have been told themselves on going in and saying, I believe the jab caused this injury. They’ve been told you’re just anxious.
Nobody knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I’m given it to the world.
Explain why, explain that. Because it’s a payment system and I’m the database administrator for it. I’m the only one because New Zealand is a small country. You can get away with one database administrator to do this. So I am in a unique position in the world and because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system, and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it.
In other countries like America or Britain, you’d need a whole team of people. So it would be very difficult for one person to get access to all of this information, but in New Zealand, because of the size and because it’s got really good IT, I happen to be the one, and I think the universe has put me here for this reason.
We are a petri dish here.
Yes, we are, and if it’s happening here, guarantee it’s happening everywhere, and we need more people like me to stand up and just come out. Don’t be scared. Just do it.
There’s a lot of emotion when you speak like that. Can you briefly, before we go into the stats, tell me what this journey has been like.
It’s been a roller coaster, but like I said, it’s harder to look than to leap. Now I’ve got to leap. Looking at this data has torn me apart for years. I’ve got to do something about it.
On that note to those who say, why didn’t you come out sooner? Address that point.
Because the data wasn’t there, I had a suspicion with science, you always question. So obviously question things right at the start, see what’s going on. The data wasn’t there to do this analysis. Now a couple of years down the track, we’ve got a huge body of data, 2.2 million people have been through the system. It’s a good data set. It’s an accurate data set. It’s not 100% complete because there are other systems out there I do not have access to, but this data set is accurate, and I can guarantee statistically correct.
So because of the time that it took to gather this data, I couldn’t go out right at the start and say, oh, there’s something wrong here. Like one day after it was rolled out, someone died. That’s insignificant, unfortunately, and it breaks…
Insignificant data wise.
…but it breaks my heart. It breaks my heart that so many people are lost because of this, and it’s the government who are behind it. Why they’re doing this? This is dead people. They should, if there is a safety signal, any safety signal at all for a vaccine, it should be withdrawn immediately, but they’ve just ignored everything and just gone straight ahead and just put their headphones on and just ignored it. Ignored, all the voices screaming “This is a danger signal. This is a killer!” and it is a killer, but they’ve just gone straight ahead with it, but it has to stop now.
So that implicates Bloomfield who has been heading up the Ministry of Health. It implicates Ardern. It implicates it. Yeah. All of that. It absolutely does, but maybe they’ve got plausible deniability.
Meaning what? Explain it.
Meaning what they didn’t know. They deliberately didn’t know.
Could they not have known this?
Maybe, I can’t speak to that. All I can say that is that the government and the media have ignored voices like ours, like yours, for too long, and when you’ve got hard data, when you’ve got government data, it is impossible for them to deny.
So the argument could be they may not have known, but they could have known had they chosen to listen to those of us pleading with them.
They deliberately cancelled voices, which told them to look at the data, and that’s gone on across the world. There’s people like Trudeau in Canada with the truck drivers. He just didn’t listen to anyone. He just went ahead with whatever agenda he had, and I’m not going to talk about that. That is a separate thing. All I want to talk about here is the actual data, the facts.
We know there are brave politicians across the world pleading still, Andrew Bridgen in the UK.
These people deserve to be heard now.
Absolutely, and there will be heard. The people will not be silent on this because, you know, he stood in Parliament, brought me to tears when he did his speech, and there wasn’t a huge uproar in the public gallery. I’d say, this is what Parliament is about. This is the people speaking, and he said at the time. This is not the first debate on excess deaths in the world, but it is the first debate, but it will not be the last.
The people will know when something is not right, and it’s getting to that point now.
The average New Zealand death rate, the mortality rate is 0.75%. That means 7 people per 1,000 die in one year. So there you see the top sites with mortality rates way, way above that.
This is huge. So if it had been safe and effective, we would have expected 0.75%. What we we’ve got 31%.
So of those 191 people who were vaccinated, at that care home, 61 of them are no longer with us.
Wow, and I would remind people we were sold the jab to protect the old people, and in terms of temporal connection to the jab, there will be a time connection?
We don’t know a month or two months. That is data that is captured, but we will have to analyze that at a later date, because all I’m trying to get out now is the general statistics. I mean, these numbers, these should be for all age groups. Maybe you’ve got one like care home, a care home, maybe elderly, the average age, maybe 80, but even if you think that the age group is 80 to 90, the mortality rate of that age group is maybe 20%? Not 31%.
32%. The reason I asked about the temporal connection is I know the third site, which I’ve looked at in detail with you and we’ll get to that, where we have a 30% rate. I know that the jabbing took place in very close time frame in some of those groups and that the deaths were within a few months. We’ll look at that in a moment, but look at the numbers.
This is a big data sandwich, which makes it statistically more relevant. The higher the number of vaccinations, the more accurate the statistics are going to be.
So we’ve got 837, the death count of 253, so 30%. Almost one in three people who got vaccinated at this site are no longer with us.
And here we have another. Residential Elder Care Services. We’ve got 923 of them jabbed. 276 dead. Which brings us to nearly 30%.
And yeah, again, to your point, that the vaccination was promoted to protect the elderly, to save them. So what is it exactly saving them from, if they were going to die anywhere? How much longer did it buy them? What was the purpose?
Here’s one of our Christchurch ones, The Doctors Christchurch South. We’ve got 48 vaccinations, 12 dead. That brings it to a quarter of those jabbed, dead. That’s way above the odds.
Way above the average, yeah, and a lot of sites have got the mortality rates under 1%, which is what you would expect. So there is something going on here that cannot be explained.
All right, Winston, let’s look more specifically at batches. A lot of people want to know, what was my batch? What can you do to help Kiwis with that?
Okay, so what I did with the data was look at the top 10 batches that had a high death count, high mortality rate, and I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it’s got a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but you can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn’t be too difficult.
Batch ID 1: Total Vaccinated 711, Death Count 152, 21.38% Dead
Batch ID 8: Total Vaccinated 221, Death Count 38, 17.19% Dead
Batch ID 3: Total Vaccinated 310, Death Count 48, 15.48% Dead
Batch ID 4: Total Vaccinated 364, Death Count 37, 10.16% Dead
Batch ID 6: Total Vaccinated 1006, Death Count 101, 10.04% Dead
Batch ID 2: Total Vaccinated 1018, Death Count 98, 9.63% Dead
Batch ID 7: Total Vaccinated 38, Death Count 3, 7.89% Dead
Batch ID 72: Total Vaccinated 5882, Death Count 278, 4.73% Dead
Batch ID 62: Total Vaccinated 18173, Death Count 831, 4.57% Dead
Batch ID 71: Total Vaccinated 11019, Death Count 498, 4.52% Dead
Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that’s only the top 10. I want to know my batch. What would you advise?
Yep, you can do that. There’s a website, find my batch for the whole world. They can actually find that, and we can list this on a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches so far in New Zealand, 119.
Of the Pfizer?
Actually now of all of them, because we have Moderna, we have AstraZeneca, but they’re only few and far between. Mostly it’s Pfizer. Mostly it’s Pfizer in New Zealand.
So people can find that, find my batch.
Yes, they should be able to.
So what I did was, our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead.
Wow, let’s have a look, and so do we then if they are all Pfizer, the top 10?
Yes they are.
Yes, they are, and this is Pfizer’s Batch ID 1. We’ve had 711 from batch number one vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% percent death rate.
They are high now, and what’s our normal that we would expect?
It should be 0.75. Because these batches are against all age groups as well. It’s not one particular batch, for one particular age group, it’s across all ages. So all the vaccination centers, whoever rocked up on the day, whatever age you were, and then it would average out. It would all average out. So there’s not one particular batch that points to one particular age group.
- So batch number 8, 221 jab, 38 dead. That’s a 17% mortality rate.
- Batch number 3, and we’ve got 48 dead out of 310. So that’s a 15%
- The last one down the bottom. Batch 71, 11,000 vaccinated, 498 dead.
Now you say down the bottom on the screen, could you just tell us what this is saying? Yeah, we are. The chances of these batches, not being a killer, are 100 billion to one. Explain that as a statistician.
Yeah. Well, if you look at the underlying mortality rate, and then you look at the ratio of percentage here, the top one, the chances of that occurring naturally by chance is almost impossible. It cannot be due to chance. So statistically, what we’re saying is that there is no chance that this vaccine is not a killer.
So with 100 billion to one, are you saying you’d have to jab…?
You’d have to jab 100 billion people to get these statistics.
And we’ve got 2.2 million on our system.
2.2 million Kiwis?
2.2 million Kiwis, and we would have had to have jabbed 100 billion of them to get these kind of results.
So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators who have the highest ratios of mortality.
For privacy reasons, we have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbing. So we’ve just called it vaccinator V1.
Yeah, but these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top, V1, has vaccinated 246 people in 60 of them are no longer with us.
That is nearly 25%.
Nearly one in four that that person vaccinated is now dead, and you can come up with any number of reasons for it, but this should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly. If it was a normal vaccine, it would be 0.75.
And if you were arguing there was one vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, that’s an aberration, but look at the other numbers. So then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people’s bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in.
Look at this one. 621 by the third highest vaccinator. 621 jabbed, 104 people dead. Nearly 17% of the people they jabbed.
Yeah, and unless they were going around terminally ill cancer wards, and injecting people who they know are going to die, then there is no other explanation for this, and why would they be doing that anyway? You know, it doesn’t make any sense. The vaccine was meant to protect those people. It’s aim was to protect the old or the ill, but it looks like we have a huge mortality rate.
Look at this one, the fifth vaccinator V5, 1682 jabbed, and of those 239 dead. These are big numbers for people who have been jabbing New Zealanders to live with. Big numbers.
So what I found with the clusters is that if you go to a vaccination centre, you know, within a few hours, there’ll be a few hundred people going there, and you’re all vaccinated, and now you’re no longer with us. If you’re vaccinated within the same time period, that is a cluster. So what I looked at was groups of three or more. So if you’re vaccinated one after the other, and you’re no longer with us, that is a cluster, but what I found here in the big one, which I’m just going to show you, which is the one in Queen’s Park Medical Outreach, and their ratio is 30%.
So what we’ve got here, eighteen clusters, of 3+ deaths per day, and here we’ve got ten clusters of 3-10 deaths per day. Three clusters of 11 to 20 deaths per day, and four clusters of 21 to 30 deaths per day. So there are numerous clusters from this one site, which is Queen’s Park Medical in Gala Street.
Statistically, this is impossible. Unless there’s something wrong with the vaccine.
So massive deaths.
Yeah. A huge ratio.
Just explain. So that site death ratio. Normally it’s 0.75% and we’ve got 30%.
I’d like to go into the details of the clusters, because I’d also like to look at the timing, the timing on the jabs to see if there was proper due diligence done in terms of taking case histories, in terms of talking to people about any hesitations they might have had, all of that sort of due diligence that we assumed would be done in relation to a vaccine. If we look at the timing on these jabs, we may well see that that simply would not be possible. So that begs the question, was there informed consent to the jabs?
And if you look at the times of vaccination, you’ll see that that would be impossible.
For the record, I’m not a hero. I don’t want to be known as a hero. It’s not who I am.
The heroes in all of this are the guys who stood up at the gates of the freedom march, who were brave enough to say no to this, who were brave enough to push back. There were the ones who were called by the guys in Parliament, ‘a river of filth’, when no one went down to see them. The real ‘river of filth’ were the ones inside the chamber on that day. People like Mallard, who turned the water and music on at three o’clock in the morning when there were children there in the middle of a hurricane. That was just awful. Those guys who stood there, they’re the heroes, I really mean that. They are beautiful people. (01) Trevor Mallard orders Parliament’s sprinklers turned on protestors to waste Wellington water https://waikanaewatch.org/2022/02/12/trevor-mallard-orders-parliaments-sprinklers-turned-on-protestors-to-waste-wellington-water/
And the ones who took the rubber bullets, the women who took rubber bullets from the police, who were meant to protect us in service. They’re the heroes, not me.
The ones who stood firm and lost their jobs just because they were told to get in a procedure that they didn’t want. They were brave enough to say no, they’re the heroes. I’m not a hero.
And that goes around the world to the heroes in Canada who inspired many of us. The truckers, when you got punished by Trudeau, who I see as just as Jacinda’s evil twin. You got punished, your bank accounts were shut down, but you were heroes to us in New Zealand. There were many in London who matched. Those people in Melbourne in Australia who also took rubber bullets when they were on a memorial to what our fourfathers did to fight tyranny in World War I. (02) They Want Australians ‘To Forget’ About The Last Two Years Of “Keeping Us Safe“ [Police] https://pennybutler.com/keeping-us-safe/
But, without you, these jabs could still go on, and without this information, we could find that someone like Bill Gates heading the World Health Organization. Basically, the Gates Foundation is running that corrupt organization. Without this, we could be finding that another plandemic, another manipulated event, could occur in which all people of the world are force-jabbed.
We’ve taken a wrong turn down a very dark road over the last two years. Humanity, the whole of humanity, not just New Zealand, like everyone, and the further we go down this road, the harder it’s going to be to get off it.
We have to get back to where we are as a human species, as a race, as custodians of this planet. If we do this to ourselves, then there’s no future for us. We cannot allow this to happen in generations to come. We’re doing this for our children so that they don’t have to experience this. This is not where we should be. This is not where we want to be. At this point in time, we cannot allow this to happen again.
Any conspiracy theorist, to my mind, deserves also enormous praise, showing a capacity for critical thinking. Conspiracy theorists should be a term of honour, a capacity to bear ostracism from society, a capacity to continue to critically think, to stand outside the herd, to say, I know it’s wrong, and I will continue to speak up.
I think we have to look at these manipulative terms designed to silence. When we have censorship, we no longer have democracy.
Exactly, yeah, and a lot of scientists in the past were called conspiracy theorists, some were prosecuted for it, and all we’re doing is trying to speak the truth, and as history shows us, some of the people we’ve thought with conspiracy theorists have been proved absolutely right.
Which side of history are you on? And as it pans out, will history prove you to be right or prove you to be wrong? And I think in a lot of cases, if you’re labelled a conspiracy theorist, in the future you’ll be labelled as someone who just knew what it was at the time.
Posts tagged Liz Gunn
|Trevor Mallard orders Parliament’s sprinklers turned on protestors to waste Wellington water https://waikanaewatch.org/2022/02/12/trevor-mallard-orders-parliaments-sprinklers-turned-on-protestors-to-waste-wellington-water/
|They Want Australians ‘To Forget’ About The Last Two Years Of “Keeping Us Safe“ [Police] https://pennybutler.com/keeping-us-safe/
Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.