German Court Case vs Virology/existence of SARS-CoV-2 (3 Videos)

IN Contagion Myth
  • Updated:10 months ago
  • Reading Time:17Minutes
  • Post Words:4133Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

First up, the case was closed without getting into the virology details when it went to court (Martin was acquitted, government had to pay his fines, but the actual real discovery they were hoping for didn’t happen), so you might not be interested in the background of it (like I am).

The third video is his interview with Dr Tom Cowan a month after Sam Bailey’s interview.

Conversations with Dr. Cowan & Friends | Ep 56: Marvin Haberland

November 10, 2022 DrTomCowan.com | Rumble1 | Rumble2

There’s also a very extensive and aggressive “opposing view” about this interview that someone has done if you are interested in exploring both sides. (07)

If you’re new here, you might not be aware that I am in “learning-phase” regarding their claims of “no infectious viruses”, so when I post these topics, it’s from the space of “seeking to understand” and to learn more about their claims with an open mind. If you’ve ever downloaded my research, you know I have a lot about different sides of this debate already.

More about the Contagion-Myth
Cowan | Bailey | Duesberg | Lanka | Mullis
Drosten | Doherty

References[+]

Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.