European COVID Commission Oct 2022
“The cat is out of the bag-it was a gigantic lie-all of the mandates, lockdowns, wearing masks, stay at home curfews, all of that-was based on a gigantic lie.” ~ Christine Anderson MP
Christine Anderson MP “C19 Measures was based on a gigantic lie”
We’re pleased to hold another press conference today because of the events unfolding after the committee session of last Monday when our colleague who I hope will still join us this morning, asked Pfizer a question, and the answer was really what made the news.
Put in a nutshell:
“The cat is out of the bag-it was a gigantic lie-what they told us. That these vaccines would prevent you catching this virus, or would prevent transmission. Well, none of that was true as it turns out, and based on that lie, all of the mandates, all of the lockdowns, all of the non-pharmaceutical measures – wearing masks, stay at home curfews, all of that-was based on that gigantic lie.”
And yet, they will not acknowledge it. No, they just go ahead with whatever they want to do with us.
I would like to point out a couple of things from the EU Commission’s Action Plan “EU Response to COVID-19 – Preparing for Autumn/Winter 2023” (01)
As you might of guessed, the focus of course is still on these hazardous mRNA injections, well that’s not surprising here. They would like to implement and coordinate an ‘effective communication initiative strategies to promote uptake of additional injections, and complete the primary series of those who have not even begun yet – “the unvaccinated”. So once again, a particular group of the population is being targetted.
They would like to increase vaccine confidence by debunking misinformation and disinformation.
Well, who is spreading the misinformation and disinformation?
- It is the EU Commission.
- It is the pharmaceutical companies.
- It is governments, especially in the Western democracies.
They are the ones spreading the mis & dis information. They are the ones telling people lies.
For what? So the pharmaceutical companies make profits and profits and profits. And the risks? Well, guess what? You, the tax payers – you will be left with the risks.
And then of course, they want to target – they specifically say that – “Target hard-to-reach population groups”.
Well, I guess in that instance, they are actually talking about me. Yes. I am in a hard-to reach population group because I saw through their lies from the get-go. I’m still unvaccinated, and I will remain unvaccinated. I will not inject a poisonous substance into my body. Point blank. So go ahead and try to “target” me. Good luck with that.
They go on with the gaslighting. Labelling “vaccine hesitancy” – this is what they call it – as “Anti-Western” and “Anti-EU”. Can you believe this? So anyone who is not willing to let themselves be injected with this “vaccine” is anti-western and anti-EU.
No, ladies and gentlemen, let’s be clear about this:
“If you do not want to poison your body – and it is your choice to do with your body whatever you please. Remember, my body, my choice? That’s “their” Narrative actually. Remember that. So, if you do not want to take these vaccines, that has nothing to do with being anti-western or anti-EU. It is pro “People”. That’s what it is. And it is Anti-Globalist Elites. That’s what it is.”
And, in this action plan, they refer several times to not only Covid-19, but now they slip in Influenza.
So this will be next for their measures, whether it be vaccinations, or non-pharmaceutical interventions like wearing masks, or staying-at-home curfews. Then, they will be able to do so when there is an “Influenza pandemic or wave”.
And whenever I think they could not possibly come up with yet another atrocity to inflict on people, they sure as heck prove me wrong.
The EU Commission proposes now to prioritize administration of the “Update” injections for the vulnerable groups, and then they list who these vulnerable groups are:
- People 60 years and older
- Individuals with underlying conditions
- Pregnant Women.
Pregnant women? I have never heard anything more despictable than that, because the point is this: They do not know what this vaccine does to the unborn child. They simply have no clue. And yet, now they’re pushing it on pregnant people. And keep in mind, there has been a drop in birth rates. We don’t know why that happened. You would expect the opposite of that – people were locked-down!
Remember what happened when they had a black-out in New York in the 70’s? Nine months later there were babies left and right.
But not this time. People were locked-up for months in their homes. Nothing. Drop in birth rate? Interesting question. And these are the questions that we should be asking.
So just to give you an update on that – they will continue to try, they will continue to push whatever their end goal is, they are trying to
And I would just like to thank you for supporting us and for letting us know that we indeed are advocating and fighting for what you the people want.
These globalists and their puppets are but a few people with no regard for you, for the people.
We, on the other hand, are many, because we are the people.
And we will continue to fight for you, for your rights, for freedom, democracy, and the rule of law.
Thank you very much.
EU wants increased injections of pregnant women
Just a few days ago, the Pfizer bomb burst in our EU Special Committee.
Now there is a new EU Action Plan for 2023. What’s written there is just sick. Now, pregnant women are to be increasingly “vaccinated”! Anyone refusing will be considered anti-Western and anti-EU. At the same time, now the narrative will be expanded on the usual Influenza.
EU MEP grills Pfizer & Moderna Reps about secretive Covid contracts, fraudulent safety & efficacy promises, and the removal of all liability. the new bivalent boosters approved without human trials, and the profits.
October 10, 2022 | Rumble | Telegram | BitChute (02)
Romanian MEP Cristian Terhes grills Moderna and Pfizer officials over their secretive Covid contracts.
European MP demanded Parliament release Pfizer Contract
“Receives Brutally Retracted Contract”
@CristianTerhes is unhappy. He thinks MEPs have the right to look at the contract that the EU signed with jab manufacturer Pfizer. Instead, he shows the public the brutally censored contract that was released to them.
Six members of the European Parliament held a press conference on October 11, 2022, one day after Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO, refused to participate in the COVID committee and answer questions.
October 11, 2022 Rumble | YouTube | Telegram (04)
00:48 – MEP Francesca Donato (Italy)
04:38 – MEP Cristian Terhes (Romania) – EU Parl | Twitter | YouTube
12:56 – MEP Virginie Jeron (France)
15:01 – MEP Sylvia Limmer (Germany)
18:26 – MEP Ivan Sincic (Croatia)
22:41 – MEP Christine Anderson (Germany)
Pfizer representitive’s full hearing in the special COVID committee of the European Parliament
After Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla refused to show and answer questions in front of the special COVID committee of the European Parliament, Janine Small, president of Pfizer’s International Developed Markets, took his place in the hearing that took place on October 10, 2022.
She received many questions from the committee members, which, in majority, she did not specifically answer.
When asked about the “redacted” version of the contract, she said that they can’t disclose the whole contract because they have interests to protect.
When asked if they tested if their injections were stopping the transmission of the virus, she said that they did not.
I post the whole hearing with Pfizer’s representative so everybody can see the context and everything that was asked and answered.
0:05:58 – Janine Small (Pfizer) – introduction
0:16:44 – dr. Franz-Werner Hass (CureVac CEO)
0:23:48 – Questions from MEPs
0:24:08 – MEP Stelios Kympouropoulos (EPP – Greece)
0:26:13 – MEP Sara Cerdas (S&D – Portugal)
0:29:01 – Answers from Janine Small (Pfizer) – she talked, among other things, about the contracts. She did not answer the question about the price of the vaccine
0:34:59 – Answers from dr. Franz-Werner Hass (CureVac)
0:37:15 – MEP Véronique Trillet-Lenoir (Renew – France)
0:39:39 – MEP Katrin Langensiepen (Greens – Germany)
0:42:24 – MEP Sylvia Limmer (ID – Germany)
0:44:55 – Answers from Dr. Franz-Werner Hass (CureVac)
0:47:32 – Answers from Janine Small (Pfizer) – she talked, among other things, about the contracts, intellectual property.
0:50:49 – MEP Francesca Donato urges that Pfizer’s representative must answer the questions
0:51:07 – MEP Robert Ross (ECR – Netherlands) – question in Dutch about the SMS between Albert Bourla and Ursula von der Leyen
0:52:38 – MEP Robert Ross – question in English: “was the Covid Pfizer vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus BEFORE it entered the market? If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee?”
0:53:13 – MEP Marc Botenga (The Left – Belgium)
0:55:47 – MEP Ivan Sincic (Non-attached – Croatia)
0:57:50 – the chair instructs the Pfizer’s representative to answer the questions
0:58:22 – Answers from Janine Small (Pfizer)
1:04:36 – Answers from dr. Franz-Werner Hass (CureVac)
1:06:48 – Answer from Janine Small (Pfizer) to MEP Sincic on a report from Canada on the clinical trials from Pfizer
1:06:48 – MEP Deirdre Clune (EPP – Ireland)
1:11:18 – MEP Romana Jerkovic (S&D – Croatia)
1:13:29 – MEP Dolors Montserrat (EPP – Spain)
1:14:25 – MEP Romana Jerkovic (S&D – Croatia) restated the question to Pfizer
1:14:50 – Answers from Janine Small (Pfizer)
1:19:07 – Answers from dr. Franz-Werner Hass (CureVac)
1:20:43 – MEP Karsten Lucke (S&D – Germany)
1:22:18 – MEP Michèle Rivasi (Greens – France)
1:24:54 – MEP Virginie Joron (ID – France)
1:26:44 – Answers from dr. Franz-Werner Hass (CureVac)
1:28:14 – Answers from Janine Small (Pfizer)
1:31:20 – MEP Christine Anderson (ID – Germany) – raised point of order
1:34:20 – MEP Cristian Terhes (ECR – Romania)
1:36:59 – MEP Francesca Donato (Non-attached – Italy)
1:39:23 – MEP Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D – Belgium)
1:40:57 – Answers from dr. Franz-Werner Hass (CureVac)
1:43:07 – Answers from Janine Small (Pfizer) – contracts and other topics
1:46:13 – MEP Cristian Terhes (ECR – Romania) – restated the question about the contracts
1:46:40 – Answer from Janine Small (Pfizer) – on why they don’t publish the contracts; the liability
Pfizer CEO backs out of testifying at EU Parliament after reports of backdoor dealings with European Commission president
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla of Pfizer has pulled out of testifying before the European Parliament following scrutiny over a secretive deal to provide Europe with more Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.
Bourla was scheduled to testify before the European Parliament’s COVID-19 committee on Oct. 10. The committee was meeting with key European officials and Big Pharma executives involved in the vaccine purchasing process. The committee’s goal was to learn more about how to quickly purchase vaccines for future pandemics. Big Pharma CEOs who have participated in committee proceedings include Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel and senior executives from AstraZeneca and Sanofi.
However, Bourla backed out after an audit report into the European Union’s vaccine procurement strategy was published in September. This raised new questions about Bourla’s contacts with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. These conversations preceded a multibillion-euro vaccine contract.
Committee chair and Member of the European Parliament Kathleen Van Brempt of Belgium said in a statement that she “deeply regrets” Bourla’s decision not to attend the Oct. 10 hearing. She noted that she was looking forward to her discussion with Bourla.
Bourla’s cancellation comes just two weeks after the fully vaccinated and boosted Big Pharma CEO tested positive for COVID-19 for the second time. Janine Small, president of international development markets at Pfizer, will attend in his place. Pfizer said Small “has been identified as best placed to support the committee in meeting their objectives.”
Corruption likely involved in EU’s latest vaccine deal with Pfizer
Bourla was expected to be interrogated and would have to address the scrutiny surrounding negotiations for the EU’s third COVID-19 vaccine contract with Pfizer. This deal covered an initial 900 million vaccine doses for delivery in 2022 and 2023, with the possibility of increasing the purchase to a whopping 1.8 billion doses if necessary.
This is the single biggest COVID-19 contract signed by the European Commission. But the deal left the EU’s Court of Auditors with some major concerns. The court found that Von Der Leyen had been directly involved in the preliminary negotiations, which were concluded in May 2021.
This is a departure from the regular negotiating procedure followed by other COVID-19 vaccine procurement contracts, where a joint negotiating team made up of officials from the European Commission and all 27 EU member countries known as the Vaccine Steering Board conducts exploratory talks with Big Pharma executives.
The steering board had planned a meeting with EU representatives and “national scientific advisors” to hammer out the continent’s vaccine strategy for 2022. This meeting never happened because of Von Der Leyen’s backdoor dealings with Bourla.
The Court of Auditors further noted that the European Commission is refusing to turn over records regarding the details of Von Der Leyen’s personal discussions with Bourla and other Pfizer executives.
Just as concerning to the COVID-19 committee was a report that Von Der Leyen and Bourla had been exchanging text messages leading up to the commission agreeing to the EU’s third COVID-19 vaccine contract with Pfizer. The audit court in its report urged the commission to search for the “relevant text messages” and “assess whether public access can be granted to them.”
The New York Times reported that this seemingly close relationship between Bourla and Von Der Leyen had been going on for months in the run-up to the EU’s COVID-19 vaccine deal with Pfizer.
Politico also did a piece: Pfizer CEO pulls out of testifying to EU Parliament COVID panel
Although those who were “following the science” already knew this, most of the general public only heard politicians and celebrities parroting the opposite and it’s especially critical because in the EU they have the passport system which makes no fucking sense at all.
Pfizer Director Admits Before European Parliament the “Vaccines” Were NEVER TESTED FOR STOPPING TRANSMISSION of Covid-19
October 10, 2022 Twitter | Rumble | Telegram
MEP Rob Roos (Netherlands) | EU Parliament Covid Hearing.
One of the #Pfizer directors admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission.
“Get vaccinated for others” was always a lie. Removes the entire legal basis for #COVID passport: let alone the family & friends torn apart and the deaths and irreparable physical & psychological damage. The world needs to know.
Leaked & FOI Released Pfizer Contracts reveal alarming demands on countries
Pfizer Wants Military Bases, Bank Reserves, Embassy Buildings & Complete Immunity from Side Effects or Laws
Pfizer Wants Military Bases for COVID Vaccines: YouTube | Rumble (06)
Argentina – Asked them to put their bank reserves, it’s military bases, and its embassy buildings as collateral to secure vaccines?
Brazil – Asked them to create a guarantee fund deposited into foreign bank account and these were Pfizers demands:
1. Waive Sovereignty of its assets abroad in favour of Pfizer
2. No laws apply to Pfizer
3. Take in account a delay in delivery
4. Not be penalized for delayed delivery
5. Side effects – Pfizer exempted.
Held to ransom by the “we only have 2 billion doses which come on a first come, first served basis”
Gravitas: Pfizer’s abusive vaccine deals (07)
Pfizer Calls the Shots & Bullies Countries
Gravitas: Revealed: How Pfizer blackmails countries for shots – YouTube (08)
Pfizer can stop countries from speaking about contracts, block vaccine donations, unilaterally change delivery schedules, and demand public assets as collateral.
Senator Antic on Pfizer director admission [12 Oct 2022]
In April 2022, the Commonwealth Department of Health objected to his assertion that the injections didn’t prevent transmission. In October 2022, in the EU Parliament, a senior Pfizer director admitted that their injections were never actually tested for preventing transmission. Mandates were never about science. They were always about coercion. The wheels are falling off their narrative day by day
See more posts on Senator Alex Antic
Dedicated Post for downloading covid contracts
I just joined Gettr and I highly recommend it - it's the best alternative to them all so far:
Telegram Channels: Get Post Updates | Chat/Comment | Video Evidence | c19 Images/Memes
|01||EU response to COVID-19: preparing for autumn and winter 2023 https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-09/2022_covid-19_prep-autumn-winter_en.pdf|
|02||Romanian MEP Cristian Terhes grills Moderna and Pfizer officials over their secretive Covid contracts. October 10, 2022 | Rumble | Telegram | BitChute|
|03||Romanian MEP @CristianTerhes shares censored contract between Pfizer and the European Union November 2021 | Rumble|
|04||Six members of the European Parliament held a press conference on October 11, 2022 Rumble | YouTube | Telegram|
|05||Pfizer representitive’s full hearing in the special COVID committee of the European Parliament | Oct 10, 2022 YouTube|
|06||Pfizer Wants Military Bases for COVID Vaccines: YouTube | Rumble|
|07||Gravitas: Pfizer’s abusive vaccine deals|
|08||Gravitas: Revealed: How Pfizer blackmails countries for shots – YouTube|
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.