COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Data Shows a Negative Benefit to Harm Ratio in New Peer-Reviewed Paper

IN C19 Prey
  • Updated:6 months ago
  • Reading Time:3Minutes
  • Post Words:728Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

An important new paper was published in volume 40, issue 35 of the peer-reviewed Vaccine journal, with an impact score of 4.1, and an acceptance rate of 32%. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283) (01)

Seriousadverseevents-doshi-pdfview

One of the authors of the paper is Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate editor of the British Medical Journal. When he put his name to a pre-print of the paper, journalist Phil Harper reported (https://philharper.substack.com/p/peer-reviewed-vaccine-trial-data) it would never find its way through peer review, and yet here we are. (02)

Put simply, both the Moderna and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial data appeared to have a negative benefit/harm ratio. Below is one of the key findings from the paper.

“In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants).

In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants).”

Quick jargon translation: AESI = adverse event of special interest. Or, in other words: serious adverse events which we should be paying very close attention to.

Serious Adverse Events are defined as “death; life-threatening at the time of the event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; medically important event, based on medical judgment.”

To find this data, investigators used four months of trial data submitted to regulators before the COVID-19 vaccines were put on the market. They gathered the data from journals, and data published by both Health Canada and the FDA. They created a blinded table of serious adverse events recorded in each trial and then had blinded investigators go through that table and determine if those serious adverse events were actually “AESIs”, defined above.

It’s important to be clear about what the findings of the paper suggest; trial data showed that mRNA vaccines appear to have a negative benefit/harm ratio.

Other key findings from the paper:

👉 There was a 16% higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients than in placebo recipients.

👉 There was a 43% higher risk of serious adverse events of special interest in mRNA vaccine recipients.

👉 mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization.

👉 Authors call for a formal risk-benefit analysis of the mRNA vaccines to take place.

👉 The authors suggest that we’ll need trial participant data in order to complete this task

👉Authors encourage third-party replication of their study, with access to complete SAE case narratives.

👉 The risks may be substantially less in some groups compared to others. Thus, knowing the actual demographics of those who experienced an increase in serious AESI in the vaccine group is necessary for a proper harm-benefit analysis.

For how much longer can the “safe and effective” mantra continue to exist?

Publication: Web | Download PDF | Supplementary Data (Word)

What to do if you’ve taken the jab?

Posts tagged: Doctors | Myocarditis | Vaccines | Against our Will

Categories: Jab Victims | Rigged Science & Medicine | Pfizer

graphene-vaccines-investigation
Living Document - First Published 8 April, 2022. Last Updated: June 2, 2022 This post is incomplete as the literature & evidence is endless so it may never be complete as it would need a ...
Teslaphoresis
Scientists in 2016 were excited to share how for years they've been able to get graphene nanotechnology to self-assemble remotely using an electric field. Post First Published: Jun 1, 2022 | Last Updated: Dec 20, ...
PfizerVialNZ-OrderedSheets
There are 4 teams in New Zealand testing the C19 Vaccine Vials. Here are some of their findings. Living Document. First Published: March 29, 2022. Last Updated: May 28, 2022 C-19 Injection Contents [New Zealand ...
Australia-Blood-Investigations
Unfortunately it seems the Aussie ones are anonymous (maybe because our health authorities have gone completely 'mad'!). However, this was submitted as an Annexure to the Atagi/TGA open letter as evidence, so it 'may' hold ...
fleming-janssen-drop-6
An Investigation into the Effects of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen Drug Biologic Vaccines on Blood. Since he has disabled the "embed" function on his videos... (which makes no sense if you wanted to get this ...
fleming-Part5-debris-airbubbles
Ok, Dr Richard Fleming put out a super-long (nearly 4 hr) video with Dr Kevin McCairn that I couldn't sit through because it was mostly talking/opinions, but afterwards he put out a 3 minute edit ...
DrJohnB-Modernamicroscopy-1
Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: A microscopy analysis. TimTruth.com does a quick run-through of DrJohnB's images here: (1/n) A microscopy analysis of a Moderna #Covidvaccine sample.A fresh sample was analyzed with bright field and phase contrast ...
DrRobertYoung-10-coronaeffect-exosomes3
I've put off doing the Dr Robert Young analysis because it's so enormous. I've decided to tackle it in parts. This is the "Corona Effect". See his website drrobertyoung.com to view the amount of work ...
DrPhilippe-Blood-50-graphene-blobs-8yochild
Graphene is in everything right now, not just those who got injected with it. We need everyone to actively work towards helping those who are under the media-spell to at least realize the danger of ...
EuniceLieveld-vaccinablood
This one doesn't have the corresponding validating evidence/documents that us truth-seekers need, but the findings are the same as those who are more validated (excepting in her 3rd video, there's a lot of parasites and ...

References[+]

Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.