COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Data Shows a Negative Benefit to Harm Ratio in New Peer-Reviewed Paper

IN C19 Prey
  • Updated:6 months ago
  • Reading Time:3Minutes
  • Post Words:729Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

An important new paper was published in volume 40, issue 35 of the peer-reviewed Vaccine journal, with an impact score of 4.1, and an acceptance rate of 32%. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283) (01)

Seriousadverseevents-doshi-pdfview

One of the authors of the paper is Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate editor of the British Medical Journal. When he put his name to a pre-print of the paper, journalist Phil Harper reported (https://philharper.substack.com/p/peer-reviewed-vaccine-trial-data) it would never find its way through peer review, and yet here we are. (02)

Put simply, both the Moderna and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial data appeared to have a negative benefit/harm ratio. Below is one of the key findings from the paper.

“In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants).

In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants).”

Quick jargon translation: AESI = adverse event of special interest. Or, in other words: serious adverse events which we should be paying very close attention to.

Serious Adverse Events are defined as “death; life-threatening at the time of the event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; medically important event, based on medical judgment.”

To find this data, investigators used four months of trial data submitted to regulators before the COVID-19 vaccines were put on the market. They gathered the data from journals, and data published by both Health Canada and the FDA. They created a blinded table of serious adverse events recorded in each trial and then had blinded investigators go through that table and determine if those serious adverse events were actually “AESIs”, defined above.

It’s important to be clear about what the findings of the paper suggest; trial data showed that mRNA vaccines appear to have a negative benefit/harm ratio.

Other key findings from the paper:

👉 There was a 16% higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients than in placebo recipients.

👉 There was a 43% higher risk of serious adverse events of special interest in mRNA vaccine recipients.

👉 mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization.

👉 Authors call for a formal risk-benefit analysis of the mRNA vaccines to take place.

👉 The authors suggest that we’ll need trial participant data in order to complete this task

👉Authors encourage third-party replication of their study, with access to complete SAE case narratives.

👉 The risks may be substantially less in some groups compared to others. Thus, knowing the actual demographics of those who experienced an increase in serious AESI in the vaccine group is necessary for a proper harm-benefit analysis.

For how much longer can the “safe and effective” mantra continue to exist?

Publication: Web | Download PDF | Supplementary Data (Word)

What to do if you’ve taken the jab?

Posts tagged: Doctors | Myocarditis | Vaccines | Against our Will

Categories: Jab Victims | Rigged Science & Medicine | Pfizer

Brownstone-PfizerProcessSwitch
No mention of the other garbage and unidentified material found by other labs all around the world, which makes me put my skeptical glasses on as to whether his testimony is meant to pivot the ...
Dental-Nano
Someone asked the question in the Telegram group, and I haven't been keeping up-to-date with what's going on in this area because I'm researching elsewhere, so I took a couple of days to download about ...
Fauci-Self-Assembling-Nanoparticle-Vaccines
Anthony "Fraud-chi" testified just days before the so-called outbreak that he was conducting a "Phase 1 clinical trial of a universal influenza vaccine that uses nanoparticle-based platform technology" and that he was conducting and supporting ...
2Microscopy-Ricardo
La Quinta Columna's March 2023 Presentation in English (Part 3 of 6) (Start at Part 1: Conference: The game is over) Microscopy session. Contents of the vials shown in public Rumble (41min) Well, let's start ...
Reduced-Graphene-Oxide-Filaments
La Quinta Columna's March 2023 Presentation in English (Part 2a of 6) (Start at Part 1: Conference: The game is over) Thesis development and presentation of scientific literature Rumble (1.5hrs) This post 00:00-9:38 2a - ...
BlueTruth-PartOne-EnglishVoiceover
BlueTRUTH documentary with English Voiceover Transcript, Screenshots, Refs BlueTRUTH Documentary (English Voiceover): (Part 1/5) Rumble-Clip (10min) | Watch Full Video rather than Clips: English Voiceover: BitChute (36min)English Subtitles: Rumble-Mirror | BitChute-Mirror | Rumble-Mirror Dr. Manuel ...
normal-vs-vaccinated-arneburkhardt
Eight German pathologists, physicians and biologists and one physicist are working together looking at autopsies and biopsies of those suspected of dying from the Covid Shots. Prof. Arne Burkhardt shares the autopsy findings. First Published: ...
FedericoNazar
Scientific proof of the PLANdemic with 2000+ peer-reviewed published references At the very end of a very long 9-hour livestream in April 2022 was a presentation by Professor Federico A. Nazar on a paper he ...
TGA-Pfizer-Batch-Employees
Why does Pfizer have "special batches" that "bypass" TGA's batch testing because they are "reserved for their own employees' vaccination program" in Australia? I have questions! Go to https://www.tga.gov.au/batch-release-assessment-covid-19-vaccines and search "employees" to get the ...
MikAnderson-Nano-Network
Today's research took me unexpectedly down a "self-assembling nanotech" rabbit hole, and this is my "scratchpad" of notes I took following the white rabbit… it connects one of the signatories of the Lancet's "quackery" letter ...

References[+]

Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.