COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Data Shows a Negative Benefit to Harm Ratio in New Peer-Reviewed Paper

IN C19 Prey
  • Updated:3 months ago
  • Reading Time:3Minutes
  • Post Words:729Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

An important new paper was published in volume 40, issue 35 of the peer-reviewed Vaccine journal, with an impact score of 4.1, and an acceptance rate of 32%. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283) (01)

Seriousadverseevents-doshi-pdfview

One of the authors of the paper is Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate editor of the British Medical Journal. When he put his name to a pre-print of the paper, journalist Phil Harper reported (https://philharper.substack.com/p/peer-reviewed-vaccine-trial-data) it would never find its way through peer review, and yet here we are. (02)

Put simply, both the Moderna and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial data appeared to have a negative benefit/harm ratio. Below is one of the key findings from the paper.

“In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants).

In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants).”

Quick jargon translation: AESI = adverse event of special interest. Or, in other words: serious adverse events which we should be paying very close attention to.

Serious Adverse Events are defined as “death; life-threatening at the time of the event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; medically important event, based on medical judgment.”

To find this data, investigators used four months of trial data submitted to regulators before the COVID-19 vaccines were put on the market. They gathered the data from journals, and data published by both Health Canada and the FDA. They created a blinded table of serious adverse events recorded in each trial and then had blinded investigators go through that table and determine if those serious adverse events were actually “AESIs”, defined above.

It’s important to be clear about what the findings of the paper suggest; trial data showed that mRNA vaccines appear to have a negative benefit/harm ratio.

Other key findings from the paper:

👉 There was a 16% higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients than in placebo recipients.

👉 There was a 43% higher risk of serious adverse events of special interest in mRNA vaccine recipients.

👉 mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization.

👉 Authors call for a formal risk-benefit analysis of the mRNA vaccines to take place.

👉 The authors suggest that we’ll need trial participant data in order to complete this task

👉Authors encourage third-party replication of their study, with access to complete SAE case narratives.

👉 The risks may be substantially less in some groups compared to others. Thus, knowing the actual demographics of those who experienced an increase in serious AESI in the vaccine group is necessary for a proper harm-benefit analysis.

For how much longer can the “safe and effective” mantra continue to exist?

Publication: Web | Download PDF | Supplementary Data (Word)

What to do if you’ve taken the jab?

Posts tagged: Doctors | Myocarditis | Vaccines | Against our Will

Categories: Jab Victims | Rigged Science & Medicine | Pfizer

DavidH1
Great overview video from David A. Hughes: Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Lincoln in the UK, comparing the vial contents from 26 labs. Rumble | Telegram | Full Video Ana Maria ...
cole-recentclots-living
Dr. Ryan Cole did not find graphene in the vials he tested, but he did find contaminants, and he was surprised by what happened when he tested the vials on Del Bigtrees' blood; however, he ...
controlling-force-george-christensen
George Christensen's greatest regret was not telling Australians what he saw in the Covid-19 Vaccines, Nov 28, 2022 YouTube | Substack | Rumble-Mirror | Telegram After 11 years in parliament, seeing the inside-workings of politics, ...
funeraldirecto-johnolooney
Funeral Directors sharing what they are seeing with vaccine deaths, sharing first-hand experiences with death certificates and families, and warning not to get the boosters. Last Updated 25 June 2023 95% of the dead that ...
DrPhilippe-Blood-11-Graphene-
Page to collate all the downloads for those who have done analysis on the Covid-vials, autopsies, or blood-work. First Published: Apr 19, 2022 | Last Updated: Dec 7, 2022 WORLDWIDE The paper "What is in ...
RW-unj-QLD-1
My friend lives in south-east Queensland on the Sunshine Coast, and after hearing from a couple of his "health freak" friends that things are coming up in all of us, vaccinated or not, he went ...
Yanowitz-19
Dr Shimon Yanowitz, about whom I wrote a post yesterday called "Dr Yanowitz’s “Connecting The Dots” Story", talks with Sasha Latypova from Team Enigma Research, about what he found in "his own" unjabbed, unswabbed blood: ...
Deomenico-10
Dr. Domenico Biscardi (Italian pharmacologist & biochemical researcher) found dead in his home under "mysterious circumstances" with rumours from the media of a "sudden heart attack"- Jan 12, 2022 - less than 2 weeks before ...
NZDSOS-Map-Magnetic-NZ-Vax
The Electromagnetism phenomenon in the Vaccinated (or what we now dub "Graphinated") is real. Along with myself and other friends who are "magnetized" (jabbed or not), this is a real phenomenon - where you would ...
DarkField1006-ItalianStudy
Australian Immunologist Professor Edward Steele talks us through the Italian study that analyzed the blood of 1,006 Symptomatic persons after they were injected with Pfizer or Moderna: Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of ...

References[+]

Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.