Evidence of Pharma Corruption & “Group-Think” | Peter Parry

  • Updated:1 year ago
  • Reading Time:15Minutes
  • Post Words:4031Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“If our ancestors were confronted as a group by an outside threat, then the main survival strategy was to “act as one” and “follow the leader.” Instinctually, we have a built-in aversion to listening to alternatives whilst the threat remains.”

Associate Professor Peter Parry: Evidence of Pharmaceutical Data Fraud, Psychological Manipulation, Criminal Activities, and Corruption

Rumble | Download on Telegram : 34 secs | 2mins | 20mins

(Hard video to transcribe because the video doesn’t show the screen of what he’s talking about, but I managed to find most of the refences he was quoting.)

Notes/Rough Transcript:

Without access to raw data, we are relying on Big Pharma, who have been shown to be untrustworthy and how this applies to the gene-based therapies.

US university study found the highest risk factor for hesitancy to the gene-based COVID-vaccines was having a PhD, particularly in a medical field.

There is widespread false-diagnosis of bipolar disorder in young children, including toddlers, in the USA. Big Pharma drove this.

“Group-think” applied amongst professionals and the public.

Marketing and not evidence-based medicine is our current reality. (01)

Internal memo from Pfizer:

  • Pfizer-sponsored studies belong to Pfizer, not the researchers.
  • Purpose of data: To support marketing.

In the thousands of pages of documents, we found that systemic practice was to:

  • Suppress negative-data regarding adverse effects, whilst positive-data would be cherry-picked or spun to provide journal publications for health professionals to read.
  • “Off-patent drugs need to be discouraged because they pose a threat to on-patent drug profits”.
  • The companies seek to influence regulatory bodies and guidelines committees.

These documents were released after being subpoenaed for criminal (not clinical) trials.

  • Pfizer has over 40 convictions totalling over 10 billion dollars in fines and pay-outs. (02)
    • Safety violations include bribery and kick-backs.
  • AstraZeneca over 20 convictions for over a billion dollars in fines.
    • In the early 2000 when I was still rather naïve, an AstraZeneca sales rep came to me. I’d put two overweight girls with psychotic illnesses on Seroquel on the basis that the article claimed that they would not gain weight and might actually lose some. They both had massive weight gain, which all doctors now know is an adverse effect of AstraZeneca’s Seroquel.
    • Internal documents show that the company was fully-aware of this at the time of publication but suppressed the data.
    • This email from the publications manager within Astra Zeneca, talks of four trials that had no good data for Seroquel, so all were quote “buried”. They then cherry-picked data that had fewer adverse effects compared to high-doses of an old off-patent drug.
  • Johnson & Johnson: over 30 convictions for an astounding 14.4 billion in fines and settlements.
  • But it’s said that because no one ever goes to jail or even seems to lose their job, that it may just be the “cost of doing business”.

In the past two years, we’ve seen studies designed to fail for some off-patent medications that threaten the need for lucrative experimental gene-therapy based vaccines. (03)

In 2014, the Lancet published that the cost of the misinformation in letting Big Pharma run its own clinical trials was a loss of billions of dollars to health and millions of lives. (04) (05) (06)

Internal memo:

  • Prozac patent was about to expire and their business plan relied on replacing Prozac with another antipsychotic drug at the time, Zyprexa.
    • Because bi-polar is rare compared to depression, they conspired to get doctors and the public to believe bi-polar disorder was common, even in toddlers.
    • “Must have the bi-polar indication to explode to create a market”
    • “Safe and Effective”

A parallel might be an experimental vaccine with high adverse events.

Benefits might outweigh risks.

  • The elderly are at high-risk of the virus.
    • However, risks might outweigh benefits. (07)
      • Yet the market and profits would be much smaller if it was only given to the elderly and vulnerable.

These documents were about influencing Medicaid to have extensive new on-patent antipsychotics on the formula that were ten to twenty times the cost of off-patent antipsychotics.

  • By spending large sums of money on “Private Negotiations in advance of the submission, which provide the opportunity to better influence the outcome.”

The medical literature cannot be trusted.

Letter to Prof John Skerrit of the TGA:

  • We need raw data to make evidence-based decisions.
    • FOI request indicated that the TGA was not in possession of the raw data but took processed FDA & Pfizer data on trust.

Alltrials campaign.

  • Make raw data available and journals can hire independent experts to analyse it. Journals could then publish that.
  • Smith described how companies get what they want from Clinical Trials.
  • FOI released Pfizer vaccine data that looks to have been yet another marketing-based more-so than evidence-based trial and perhaps the most profitable yet.

BMJ 2003: Trials sponsored by the manufacturer have a four-fold increased chance of finding fewer harms and more benefits than fully independent drug-trials. (08)

India told Pfizer it could have access to its huge market only if they could do independent safety tests on Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine.

  • Pfizer then dropped its application for such a big market. (09)
  • As an aside, India also has a traditional inactivated virus vaccine, manufactured by a local pharmaceutical company, which my wife and I had applied for to get TGA import rules recognized by the Australian Immunization Register.
    • But the World Health Organization pressured India into not exporting this vaccine.
      • There are investigative journalists and WHO whistleblowers who talk of the ‘capture’ of the World Health Organization by BigPharma influences.
    • Pfizer has captured medical boards and medical education activities.

TrialSiteNews is an independent news media reporting on clinical drug trials.

FOI request by Canadian virologist to the Japanese regulator released one Pfizer biodistribution study that’s chilling in its implications. The lipid nanoparticle carrier of the mRNA goes to all organs – particularly the ovaries, and crosses the blood-brain barrier. (13)

FOI Biodistribution

Reveals mRNA vaccine nanoparticles are circulated throughout the entire body Brain, heart, liver, ovaries, testes and more

They say “mRNA vaccine shots stay in the arm and don’t circulate nanoparticles around the body.”

Research conducted in Japan shows that Lipid NanoParticles (LNPs) containing the mRNA code are widely circulated around the body after vaccination, reaching the brain, spleen, large intestine, heart, liver, lungs and other organs.

The study was originally written in Japanese and auto-translated into English.

The study reveals how mRNA LNPs are distributed across the body, even affecting ovaries and testes, raising huge questions about fertility in those receiving mRNA vaccine shots. The following chart shows the mass of NLPs (in micrograms) found in each organ following mRNA vaccination.

Other research shows spike proteins being produced for months-much longer than the virus itself. (14) (15)

Based on long-lasting gene-created spike proteins and biodistribution to all organs, a high rate of adverse events have been seen, including by January about 1000 peer-reviewed articles on this issue. (16) (17)

It affects the whole demographic-not just the elderly and vulnerable.

As more Pfizer documents are released and analyzed, anomalies are seen particularly with data from two Argentinian trial sites.

There was from Argentina, just more recently released-a young healthy male developed Myocarditis-but files reveal they were pressured to change the diagnosis to Pneumonia (which he didn’t have), and COVID (but his PCR was negative), to anxiety and then to paranoia-because he had started to believe the hospital and medical trial were conspiring against him. He was then written out of the trial. (19) (20) (21) (22) (23)

The Pfizer documents show that 300 others were also written out of the trial. (24)

The BMJ has published testimony from whistleblowers conducting the Pfizer trial, that data was falsified, patients unblinded, vaccinators poorly trained, not all possible COVID cases got PCR-tested, etc.

  • For reporting these irregulatories to the FDA, Brooke Jackson – experienced clinical trial manager – was fired within hours.
    • Facebook censored the BMJ article as misinformation.

A peer-reviewed article goes into an alleged reporting bias in the Pfizer-Moderna trial.

  1. Only a tiny number of Covid cases occurred in the clinical trial.
  2. The vast majority of those with Covid symptoms were not tested.
  3. Given the study was allegedly unblinded, this is a case for possible fraud because you could choose ‘not’ to test people in the Pfizer arm at a higher rate.
  4. All-cause mortality was actually higher in the Pfizer arm than in the placebo arm, and the difference was cardiac deaths.
  5. The trial never tested where the vaccine stopped transmission.
  6. Senior BMJ editor Peter Doshi factored back in the covid symptom cases that were untested, efficacy dropped to 19% to a maximum of 29% for 7 days post-vaccine.
  7. Of those results, Pfizer would never have gotten an Emergency Use authorization from the FDA because it wouldn’t of achieved the required 51% or greater efficacy.

Talks about 12 year old Maddie de Garay Pfizer-adolescence trial who was left paralyzed after her adverse event.

  • Pfizer wrote this up in the New England (NEJM) journal as “functional abdominal pain” (25)
    • In other words, a psychosomatic mental health disorder.

Professor Healey on his blog highlights how an AstraZeneca trial participant also suffered an apparent neurological adverse event, and was written-out of the AstraZeneca trial. (26) (27) (28)

  • Despite emails to the New England journal of medicine, this was never rectified. (29) (30)
    • This concurs with those AstraZeneca internal documents about adverse events that I read over a decade ago.

In Germany, cardiology consultations tracked along with gene-based vaccine rollout, and German pathologists, found autopsy evidence mRNA created spike proteins in inflamed blood vessels, related to blood clots.

Prominent British cardiologist Dr Malhotra notes research predicting increased cardiac death based on inflammatory marker increases post-gene-based vaccines. (31)

Aseem Malhotra

Evidence-Based Medicine Has Been Hijacked

YouTube (32)

He says cardiologist colleagues in the United Kingdom, have similar data but are “terrified of reporting it, because they will lose industry funding”.

Documents also reveal that the pharmaceutical industry use sophisticated marketing techniques to create narratives within the health industry. (33) (34)

  • They psychological profile doctors into five groups such as “high flyers” who they want to use the drugs early for new indication. (35)
    • High flyers make up 12% (by their research) of doctors.
  • The next group is “rule-bound“, amounting to 16%, who was said in this Eli Lilly documents “Always follow authority and guidelines – even with confronted with clear evidence to contrary“.
  • And with that 28% the other two groups, will “fall in line with herd behaviour”, and a new narrative about a class of medications and disease indications can be created.
  • A fifth group is “Skeptical Experimenters” – described as doctors skeptical of the industry, wanting to know basic pathophysiological mechanisms of disease and treatment, and risk-benefit ratios.
    • They were seen as a “lost cause” for marketing-based medicine.

I have taught developmental psychology and evolutionary psychological principles.

  • The past two years have made me think about herd behaviour and humanity, and how a dominant narrative can suppress normal, rational debate.
  • There are four commonly known survival strategies:
    • Fight. Flight. Freeze. Appease.
      • These are switched-on if you see a snake for instance, or for appease; you’re confronted with a stronger, aggressive human.
    • However, if the hominin tribe of our ancestors was confronted not as individuals, but as a tribal group by an outside threat, then the main survival strategy is to ‘act as one’, and to ‘follow the leader’.
      • It is to “follow the narrative” of the tribal alpha male chimp or caveman chief, etc.
        • Instinctually, humans then have built into us, an aversion to listening to alternative narratives whilst the threat remains, and will respond with hostility to tribal members who go against the narrative.

The conformity experiments of Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram – both Jewish psychologists in America in the aftermath of World War II, who sought to understand how Nazism grabbed the minds of a sophisticated nation.

  • See also more Myocarditis studies & my Post about mRNA and the heart
    • Myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination – A case series (42)
    • Myopericarditis after messenger RNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Adolescents 12 to 18 Years of Age (43)
    • Myocarditis Following Immunization With mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the US Military (44)
    • Association of Myocarditis With BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Case Series of Children (45)
    • Patients With Acute Myocarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination (46)
    • Intermittent complete heart block with ventricular standstill after Pfizer COVID-19 booster vaccination: A case report (47)
    • Myocarditis, Pericarditis and Cardiomyopathy After COVID-19 Vaccination (48)
    • Pubmed Abstract Search “mRNA Myocarditis


Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.