Two Dutch MP’s Calling out Globalists Reset Plan: “COVID = Distraction, Reset = Mission”

  • Updated:11 months ago
  • Reading Time:9Minutes
  • Post Words:2107Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Crap – just found this in my drafts – I thought I posted this last year! I have 111 “unfinished” posts – probably wanting more references or something – but I’m going to try and post all the finished ones asap – there’s so many half-finished posts that I wish that I could finish – I wish I had a team of people x.

By the way, Netherlands is so awake – check out what their up to in the World Freedom Convoy

2 MP’s from Netherlands call out the Globalist Plan bringing up the 2010 Rockefeller Lockstep report, the Great Reset, digital passports, collective psychosis, obedience training and the World Economic Forum.

While the “fact-checking” arm of the mainstream media has attempted to shut down the mere mention of this damning Rockefeller Foundation report, the parallels are undeniable.



First part of Video: Thierry Baudet, Calls out Rockefeller Lockstep and slammed this era as “obedience training” conditioning citizens to accept unscientific, “arbitrary” mandates from their governments:

Second part (4:50 mark): Gideon Van Meijeren, Calls COVID a distraction for the Great Reset and calls the PM a liar for denying any knowledge of it.

Dutch MP, Thierry Baudet

Dutch MP, Thierry Baudet, calls out prophetic pandemic scenario from a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation Report that mirrors many tyrannical moves from governments playing out today on a global scale:

In a scenario from the Rockefeller Foundation report (See Page 18), “National leaders all over the world would strengthen their power with laws, rules, and restrictions, from the requirement to wear masks to body temperature checks on entering train stations, planes, buildings….”

Chairperson, in 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of the most influential NGOs in the world, developed a number of scenarios for the future of technology and international development.

And in this report, the Rockefeller Foundation describes the so-called “Lock Step Scenario” on the coming of a world-wide pandemic and its aftermath. Already in 2010.

According to this scenario — and I have it here with me — the Chinese would be the first to begin with “required quarantine for all citizens” — that’s a quote — and immediate and almost hermetic closing off of all borders.

National leaders all over the world would strengthen their power with laws, rules , and restrictions, from the requirement to wear masks to body temperature checks on entering train stations, planes, buildings. It all comes in here. But it doesn’t even stop there.

According to Scenario Lock Step, we have a lot more to look forward to: “Even after the pandemic was over,” the researchers write, “the authoritarian control would remain, with supervision of the citizens and their activities, and would even be intensified.” In this report from 2010, even climate lockdowns are hinted at.

Precisely what they are already beginning to talk about in our time.

I quote: “To protect oneself against increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and increasing poverty, leaders all over the world will increase their grip on power.”

And the report also predicts well how citizens would react to all the regulations.

Sorry, I say. Just as now, people shout with joy when they are vaccinated, photos of their injected arm on social media — it is all in this report — and they beg for a Corona passport, the Lock Step Scenario writers predict, just as I said. The more controlled world thus finds, so they predicted in 2010, much acceptance among the people. Citizens voluntarily gave up part of their sovereignty — and their privacy — in exchange for more safety and stability.

Citizens were more tolerant and even eager to get more top-down steering and supervision.

National leaders had more freedom to enforce order in ways they themselves saw fit.

That this would lead to a digital passport, the authors of the Rockefeller Foundation report had also foreseen. In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation was not able to literally predict the current technological state of things, but they thought then that sharpened supervision would lead to a biometric ID for all citizens. And it is now in our paper passports.

The digital vaccination passport is just a supplement.

Just 13 years after the pandemic, the public would, according to the Rockefeller Foundation, realize they have been cheated, had enough of the controls and the absurd power fantasies of the masters.

And Chairperson, I still hope that the Rockefeller Foundation is wrong on that point.

All of their forecasts have come true, but I hope that here they are really wrong, that a point comes that we wake up.

That we realize that this is a collective psychosis.

That the locking up of our country, of half the world, lasting a year and a half because of a flu variant, is madness.

That we run around with the BS — non-functional masks, that we abide by the completely nonsensical distance regulations. And see our businesses, our social life go to pieces.

That we with great, first-line medicines like Ivermectin, Tegenhouden, only accelerate experimental injections to the status of “authorized vaccine” that can be given.

That we chatter over, “Oh, the infection will come back,” while this past year naturally, it also happened, just as it happens every year, just as, naturally, that with autumn, comes the new infection, just like always happens.

And we pretend that it is because of Corona while what we earlier called the flu, would seem to have completely disappeared.

But it is most important, and these will be my closing words, that we realize that with a pretext, one or another hysteria over this Chinese flu, an infrastructure has been put together that in any arbitrary moment, because of any arbitrary event, the authority can be applied again. Lockdowns, masks, keeping distance, no more travel, no more hand shaking, allowing absurd experimental injections.

This Corona period was an obedience training. The Tweede Kamer and the Rutte government have carried out this training brilliantly. Congratulations.

Klaus Schwab can be proud of you. The globalist plan can find the passageway, and the next step toward mass surveillance and total control can be set. —Thank you.’

Thierry Baudet

Thierry’s YouTube Channel

Links to the Rockefeller 2010 Report:

It’s also spread all across the internet since that time, so if the above doesn’t work, search:

Or Grab all the Tabletop Exercises from my downloads folder:

Dutch MP, Gideon Van Meijeren

Second Video: Dutch politician Gideon Van Meijeren dropping covid truth bombs and calling out Klaus Schwab / Great Reset / World Economic Forum. Covid lock downs are used to implement a new world order.

—Thank you, Chairwoman.

Chairwoman, more and more people are seeing that it is a big lie that the current Corona measures are meant to protect public health.

This begs the question: why are all these awful measures being implemented that change our entire way of living, destroy our entire society?

Now, there are a couple of influential globalists, who according to their own words, view the Corona crisis as a huge opportunity to “reset” our world.

It means they have a perverse incentive to make this last longer.

One of those globalists is Klaus Schwab, founder and chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF). He has also written a book with the catchy title: COVID-19 — The Great Reset.

So my question to the Prime Minister is: How does he judge the content of this book?

The Prime Minister —I don’t know the book, Madame Chairwoman.

However, I’d like to advise Mr. van Meijeren not to go too much into all those conspiracy theories.

I watch them on YouTube as well and I think it’s fascinating how they explain that 9/11 didn’t happen or that it’s all different. All put together very nicely, but usually it is what it is, a conspiracy theory.

Mr. van Meijeren —It’s surprising to me that the first question I ask Mr. Rutte since I’ve been instated…

For which I congratulate you.

—Thank you, but it surprises me that the first question is answered with a lie, because I’m holding a letter here, dated November 26, 2020.

This is a letter from Mr. Rutte to Mr. Klaus Schwab in which he thanks him for sending the book and calls it a hopeful analysis for a better future.

Would Mr. Rutte like to rummage through his memories? It’s not more than six months ago.

I don’t know how long your memories stay active, but it is probably still possible to dig this up, in order to answer my first question once again, but this time honestly, please.

Well, the honest answer is that that is a “nice” letter. One in which you, although you can’t read every book cover to cover, but still make a kind reply to the sender.

Well, then, the Prime Minister is saying he didn’t lie to me, but to Mr. Klaus Schwab.

But then let me ask the question directly here, Mr. Klaus Schwab, who argues in his book for resetting our world, to replace our national parliamentary democracy with a global technocracy, and he argues for an end to private property.

So Mr. Rutte is apparently not even aware that he has called this a hopeful message for a better future.

How is it possible for Mr. Rutte to attach a value judgment to a book with a neo-Communist message, when he has not even read that book?

The Prime Minister. Yes, Klaus Schwab is founder of the World Economic Forum.

The man has spent his entire life in service to bringing together the private sector, politics, NGOs in order to create a dialogue on how to move this world forward.

I have the utmost respect for him. I don’t agree with him on everything.

I did read another book of his, about the fourth industrial revolution. I liked that one very much, but not this book.

So yes, personally I have great respect for Professor Klaus Schwab And his life’s work with the World Economic Forum, which I think is of great importance as a platform to meet each other and where also many young people get a chance to confront the big issues concerning climate and environmental transitions and energy transitions, including how we can set up our future industry well.

Discussions take place in full transparency for everyone to see.

So there’s no reason to doubt the intentions of Klaus Schwab. —

Mr. van Meijeren – Well, to conclude, because I would also like to make an interjection to outgoing Minister de Jonge next.

I think it would be nice if Mr. Rutte would just send a correction to Klaus Schwab stating that he does not think that his book offers a hopeful message for a better future, that he has not read it and that he doesn’t think it is a good book, as he has stated in his last comment.

Surely that seems the least we can expect from an honest Prime Minister. I thought I would leave that for a moment before speaking in the Tweede Kamer debate following the football match. So that it’ll be fine.

Gideon Van Meijeren

It isn’t a “conspiracy theory” when they’re openly telling you what they want to do.

See also: Rigged-Agenda | Great Reset | New World Order

Penny (
Penny (

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.