Journey

Dr. Aseem Malhotra Who Promoted Covid-19 Vaccine on TV Calls for Its Immediate Suspension

Rumble

My name is Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Consultant Cardiologist. Today, I share my most recent publication, published in the peer reviewed, international Journal of Insulin Resistance. The title of my paper is Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on the COVID MRNA Vaccines Through Real Evidence-Based Medicine. In part one of the paper, I aim to determine, through critical analysis of randomized control trial data and real-world evidence, the true benefits and harms of the COVID MRNA vaccines, with special emphasis on the biotech Pfizer vaccine.

The conclusions are quite sobering. In the non-elderly population, the numbers needed to treat to prevent one COVID death run into the thousands. Reanalysis of randomize control trial data from both Moderna and Pfizer reveals one is more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from the COVID-19 vaccines than to be hospitalized with COVID-19. Pharmacovigilance data, coupled with plausible biological mechanism of harm, is also deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety, mirroring a potential signal from Pfizer’s phase three trial. There is also a significant increase in [inaudible 00:01:32] cardiac arrests in England in 2021, data which is also replicated in Israel, with an increase in heart attacks and sudden cardiac death in people aged between 16 and 39, specifically related to the COVID MRNA vaccines and not related to COVID.

In part two of the paper, I aim to get to the root cause to understand why authorities in sections of the medical profession supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies, such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, undermining the principles of ethical evidence-based medicine and informed consent. These regrettable actions are the symptom of the medical misinformation mess, the tip of a mortality iceberg where prescribed medications are now estimated to be the third most common cause of death, after heart disease and cancer. Underlying root causes of this include regulatory capture. Guardians that are supposed to protect the public are in fact funded by the very corporations that stand to gain from the sale of those medications.

A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives through relatively simple, low-cost lifestyle changes. In conclusion of both papers, there is a strong scientific, ethical, and moral case to be made that COVID-19 vaccines rollout must stop immediately until raw data has been released for fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future, the medical and public health professions must recognize these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to restore trust in these institutions, but the future and the health of both the medical profession and humanity depend on it. To read both papers, which are free and open access, please visit insulinresistance.org.

Thank you.

Twitter: Sept 3, 2021

BREAKING:
I am holding the government directly responsible for the death of my father @KailashChandOBE (& likely countless others) for deliberately withholding information from the public & doctors that would have changed his outcome. The #NHS is broken. https://t.co/q9e7erbFw7 pic.twitter.com/dls5QqRN0Z

— Dr Aseem Malhotra (@DrAseemMalhotra) September 3, 2021

Dr Aseem Malhotra wrote an open letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson and US President Joe Biden calling for the immediate release of the raw data from Pfizer’s original Covid-19 vaccine trial.

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 1 Aseem Malhotra Journal of Insulin Resistance ^{(01)Malhotra, Aseem. “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 1.” Journal of Insulin Resistance [Online], 5.1 (2022): 8 pages. Web. 24 Oct. 2022 … Click for full citation}

Background: In response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), several new pharmaceutical agents have been administered to billions of people worldwide, including the young and healthy at little risk from the virus. Considerable leeway has been afforded in terms of the pre-clinical and clinical testing of these agents, despite an entirely novel mechanism of action and concerning biodistribution characteristics.

Results: In the non-elderly population the “number needed to treat” to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomised controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19s.

Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety. Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021, with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group.

Conclusion: It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 2 Aseem Malhotra Journal of Insulin Resistance  ^{(02)Malhotra, Aseem. “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 2.” Journal of Insulin Resistance [Online], 5.1 (2022): 10 pages. Web. 24 Oct. 2022 … Click for full citation}

Background: Authorities and sections of the medical profession have supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, undermining the principles of ethical evidence-based medical practice and informed consent. These regrettable actions are a symptom of the ‘medical information mess’: The tip of a mortality iceberg where prescribed medications are estimated to be the third most common cause of death globally after heart disease and cancer.

Results: Underlying causes for this failure include regulatory capture – guardians that are supposed to protect the public are in fact funded by the corporations that stand to gain from the sale of those medications. A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives with relatively simple – and low cost – lifestyle changes.

Conclusion: There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current COVID vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future the medical and public health professions must recognise these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical-industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions, but the health – of both humanity and the medical profession – depends on it.

Summary overview (Source: Dr Robert Malone’s substack)

Press Conference: Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s New Peer-Reviewed Paper Calls for Immediate and “Complete Suspension” of Covid-19 Vaccine

The World Council for Health hosted a press conference in London on September 27, 2022 featuring one of Britain’s most influential cardiologists: Dr. Aseem Malhotra.

WCFH | Rumble | YouTube | Odysee

Dr. Aseem Malhotra presented on his new peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance and was joined by Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist from the United States, and Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of E-BMC Ltd and EbMCsquared CiC and member of the WCH Steering Committee.

In a two-part paper entitled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine,” real-world data reveals that in the non-elderly population the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one death from Covid-19 runs into thousands and that re-analysis of randomized controlled trial data suggests a greater risk of suffering a serious adverse event from the vaccine than to be hospitalized with Covid-19.

“We must use this as an opportunity to transform the system to produce better doctors, better decision making, healthier patients and restore trust in medicine and public health. Until all the raw data on the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines have been independently analysed, any claims purporting that they confer a net benefit to humankind cannot be considered to be evidence based.” 

Watch on the GB News website: “Doctor who promoted Covid vaccines on TV calls for all remaining mandates to end”

Dr Aseem Malhotra was one of the first people in the UK to take two doses of the Covid vaccine and promote them on television

“When the vaccines were first released we were told they were 95% effective against infection.

This is not true. This is based on relative risk reduction. In absolute terms, they provided 0.84 percent protection which means only one in 119 people would be protected from infection.

This statistic was the pretense under which vaccine mandates were implemented.

“The latest data reveals that once infected there is no significant difference in transmission rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, which makes any scientific case for mandates illegitimate.

As newer and thankfully, less lethal, mutated strains became dominant, any protection against infection at the very least became less effective and likely completely ineffective, even if there is some significant (as yet to be fully determined in absolute individual terms) protection against serious illness and death.”