Living Document – Last updated July 11, 2021

June 19, 2022 – FORGET THIS POST – They are all a bunch of liars. Instead, browse by tag to see what criminals these companies are and stay the hell away from all of them.

Pfizer | AstraZeneca | | Moderna | Novavax

Part Two: SARS-CoV-2 Research for Family & Friends [Part 2]:

Differences between the Vaccines

AstraZeneca

Oxford/AstraZeneca is the first COVID-19 vaccine introduced to Australia. It is best known for blood clots especially for younger people, and neurological problems in trials. It has been banned in 18 countries and suspended in 4. This actually should’ve made sense to be one of the more safer vaccines, so it’s quite interesting to see that it’s been banned in so many countries, leading those of us who are hesitant on these new vaccines to have a lot of questions that doesn’t seem to be being answered yet.

Dosage Changes:
Their trials had both Low Dose / Standard Dose and Standard Dose / Standard Dose.

The Low dose was apparently an accident, but it turned out more effective (possibly because the low dose replicated a more ‘natural’ viral entry). 

When they used standard dose/standard dose, they think the reason it was less effective, is because the first dose possibly created such a immune response to the chimpanzee adenovirus that the immune system killed the adenovirus before it could insert its SARS-CoV-2 DNA. 

However, interestingly, when I downloaded the TGA factsheet, we are using 2 standard doses with a recommendation of 12 weeks apart. ^{(05) TGA: auspar-chadox1-s-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-210215-pi.pdf}

Warnings:

• Concurrent illness
  administration of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca should be postponed in individuals suffering from an acute severe febrile illness. However, the presence of a minor infection, such as cold, and/or low-grade fever should not delay vaccination.
• Thrombocytopenia and coagulation disorders
  COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca should be given with caution to individuals with thrombocytopenia, any coagulation disorder or to persons on anticoagulation therapy, because bleeding or bruising may occur following an intramuscular administration in these individual
• Use in the elderly
  There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals over 65 years of age. The decision to immunise an elderly patient should be decided on a case-by-case basis with consideration of age, co-morbidities, their environment, potential benefits and potential risks
• Use in individuals with significant co-morbidities
  There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals with significant co-morbidities. The decision to immunise an individual should be made on the basis of potential benefits over risks to that individual.
• Immunocompromised individuals: The immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca has not been assessed in immunocompromised individuals, including those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. The immunogenicity of vaccines may be lower in immunosuppressed patients.

Adverse Effects: 

Trial Reactions: injection site tenderness (>60%); injection site pain, headache, fatigue (>50%); myalgia, malaise (>40%); pyrexia, chills (>30%); and arthralgia, nausea (>20%).

Post-Trial Reactions: Transverse Myelitis

Insufficient data: Neurological: Very rare events of demyelinating disorders have been reported following vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca. A causal relationship has not been established.

I need to lookup why 18 countries have banned it, but yet it’s still in use. Is it because of the clots or some other issue? I’ll update soon.

Denmark, Norway, Iceland, Austria, Estonia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Italy, and Latvia – suspended due to thromboembolic events. ^{(06) Covid-19: European countries suspend use of Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine after reports of blood clots}

Pfizer and Moderna

Not much differences between Pfizer and Moderna. Both use the new technology called messenger RNA (mRNA) that delivers genetic material into our cells with a piece of RNA that our cell will use to make instructions to create a piece of the virus spike protein. Once the immune system detects the copies of the spike protein, it creates antibodies against it. The body can then remember how to trigger an immune response and create antibodies that fight the virus if infected in the future. Approved in UK, EU and US. Australia has just now got Pfizer and has ordered Moderna.

Moderna is a larger ‘product’ (what I’m calling it until I have a better understanding). So it contains more ‘volume of the ingredients’? They both have different storage and transport requirements due to the different lipid particles used (Pfizer’s particle is more vulnerable and needs heavy-duty freezing).

I have spent hours trying to discover the differences between the lipid particles, and cannot find anything official.

Although it seems that all of the vaccines are causing clots to some extent (possibly caused by spike protein, as even the virus itself is causing clots). Pfizer has somehow stayed out of the limelight. I’m not sure if the media has something to do with that since visiting the vax victims site where there is no censorship, there’s a lot more being reported (across the board, no matter what vaccine is taken). Moderna has stayed out of the limelight for blood clots even though they have also been reported, but hasn’t escaped being dubbed “The Moderna Arm” (content warning: image search of “The Moderna Arm”) as a large itchy rash occurs at the injection site about a week or so after the jab, possibly caused by the larger aforementioned ingredient. Please note: Videos for the mRNA vaccines were in Part One: Understand The New MRNA Vaccines ^{(07) Understanding The New MRNA Vaccines}

Update July 11, 2021 – A new study – June 29, 2021 ^{(08) Montgomery J, Ryan M, Engler R, et al. Myocarditis Following Immunization With mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the US Military. JAMA Cardiol. Published online June 29, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2833} of U.S. service members found higher than expected rates of heart inflammation following receipt of a COVID vaccine.

U.S. military physicians described myocarditis in previously healthy males who developed the condition within four days of receiving a COVID vaccine. 23 male patients (22 currently serving in the military and 1 retiree) with a median age range of 25 years were evaluated between January and April 2021 for acute-onset chest pain following vaccination with an mRNA COVID vaccine.

All military members were previously healthy with a high level of fitness. They were physically fit by military standards and lacked any known history of cardiac disease, significant cardiac risk factors or exposure to cardiotoxic agents.

Seven military members received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine and 16 received the Moderna vaccine. Each patient had a final diagnosis of myocarditis without infectious, ischemic or autoimmune etiologies identified. Diagnoses were reviewed and met the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) case definition criteria for probable myocarditis.

Update May 28, 2021 – CDC has published an increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination since April 2021. Reported cases have occurred predominantly in male adolescents and young adults 16 years of age and older. ^{(09) Clinical Considerations: Myocarditis and Pericarditis after Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Among Adolescents and Young Adults}

Novavax

Phase 3 trial ended – not yet approved. Here is Dr Been breaking down the PhaseIIIb UK Trial Results ^{(14) Dr Been breaking down the PhaseIIIb UK Trial Results}

Type A protein subunit vaccine, NVX-CoV2373, designed using part of Covid-19, and contains spike proteins produced by moth cells infected with genetically modified version of coronavirus. Also contains an “adjuvant”, which enhances immune response.

Potential Problems

Common adverse reactions (for all vaccines):

• injection site pain, swelling, redness, tenderness, joint pain
• fatigue, headache
• chills, fever
• malaise
• nausea, vomiting
• swollen lymph nodes

Most of the available vaccines have the same risks and side-effects

Across the board – there are common risks of adverse side-effects being reported in all of them. Various in nature (I’ll get into them in the next section “Risks vs Benefits”), some of them serious, which may be due to underlying conditions – but those with underlying conditions are the main people at risk (for both the vaccines and covid-19), which is the main reason we have concerns. You want our most vulnerable to have the vaccines; so we need to know they are actually safe for them to take.

Whilst AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson had more media coverage regarding blood clotting risks, mRNA vaccines Pfizer & Moderna have also had blood clotting cases, and those who contract COVID-19 also report blood clots. Is it something to do with the spike protein itself that is causing it?

We have not long ago discovered that the spike protein itself damages and attacks our vascular system on a cellular level, ^{(17) SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2 (18) Endothelial cell damage is the central part of COVID-19 and a mouse model induced by injection of the S1 subunit of the spike protein} and that the vaccines spike protein may also effect host cells. ^{(19) SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Cell Signaling in Human Host Cells: Implications for Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines} Perhaps this is why people are getting strokes and clots regardless of whether they are vaccinated or get COVID-19?

It doesn’t necessary mean not to take the vaccines and the studies even suggest that taking the vaccine will offer better protection, however they never referenced how they came to that conclusion or showed a study that proved how they are different. How exactly is the ‘fake’ spike (they created in the study) different than the ‘fake’ spike the vaccines make? And how are they unlike the spike protein in the virus? The suggestion that the vaccine won’t cause the same damage looks like it was added as an ‘after-thought’.

Any additional new research that identifies ‘red flag markers’ for those who are hesitant, needs to be honestly and methodically addressed instead of dismissed by adding a one-liner. Is there any research on any of that? Or is it just a guess? Where can we see the exact studies you looked at, to make the same determination? People’s lives are at stake here, we want to know that the vaccine is actually safer than the virus – this is not something that has been adequately addressed – don’t dismiss our concerns with a one-liner – find out for sure and show us how the data supports your claim. We want to believe but for the hesitant to believe that the spike protein in the vaccine may not cause problems – you need to give us more evidence.

18 countries have so far banned AstraZeneca, and other countries, including Australia say that it’s no longer recommended for under 50’s but are still recommending it for those most at risk. At the same time, the vaccine fact-sheet ^{(20) AstraZeneca – TGA.gov.au Fact Sheet} states there’s limited data available for the safety and that it should be decided on a case-by-case basis for those who are over 65 or have health issues… and in the same breath our government is reiterating ‘calling the hotline to get vaccinated’ because “only getting vaccinated will end the pandemic”.

TGA Oxford-AstraZeneca Fact Sheet:

Plus we’re not even sure ‘everyone’ actually ‘needs’ the vaccine – as of today (June 1st 2021) there is still no data showing that it actually stops the spread. There’s “we hope”, there’s “it looks like it might decrease the viral load” ^{(21) Decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral load following vaccination – preprint} which might indicate that it “may ‘help’ to reduce the spread”, but if we are weighing up our apparent ‘choice’ in this: if we have found alternative treatment protocols, and don’t yet trust the risk we’re taking with the new fast-tracked vaccines, the main thing left is… “are we actually putting other people at risk if we don’t get the vaccine?“.

So far, (as at June 1st, 2021) the jury is out on whether it can actually stop the spread. Those who are vaccinated, can still spread the virus and still get the virus. The vaccine will hopefully reduce their symptoms, which may in turn reduce viral load, which may in turn ‘lessen’ the spread, but there’s no data yet on whether it can effectively protect others around them, which is a big question mark for those of us with hesitancy.

We don’t want to harm others with our choices, we don’t want to put anyone at risk, and we don’t want to give bad advice to others, but we don’t have all the information to make an informed decision, we don’t know which path is the right one, and we don’t just hold our arms out blindly when there’s all these question marks that aren’t being adequately answered.

Please remember we are real people trying to find answers – we’re not scientists or medical professionals and a lot of the studies have a lot of scientific and medical jargon that we struggle to understand, and that there are both scientists and medical professionals who DO understand the jargon who are choosing not to get the new vaccines. We’re at a stand-still until we get all our questions answered.

Our family, friends and loved ones are getting these new vaccines. We want to know that it’s safe for our most vulnerable to get. But we have a long list of concerns that haven’t been addressed.

Continue to Part Three: Potential Problems with these new Vaccines / Risks vs Benefits (Pending)

See all posts that I’ve completed in the series (Summary of COVID-19 Posts)

Any notes I’ve taken when researching are collected in the following spreadsheet (before adding to this post). You can check to see if there are any updates here:

Site Notifications/Chat: 

• Telegram Post Updates @JourneyToABetterLife (channel)
• Telegram Chatroom @JourneyBetterLifeCHAT (say hi / share info)
• Gettr Post Updates @chesaus (like fakebook)

Videos:

• Telegram @c19Videos
•  Rumble @ImportantCensoredVideos

Aussies

Reveal PayID 323

Or Buy me a Coffee (PayPal)