New CONVID? Don’t fall for it. [Dr Sam Bailey]
Dr Sam Bailey goes through the similarities between the 2022 Gates-WHO-Hopkins tabletop and the current China pneumonia news stories.
Dr Sam Bailey goes through the similarities between the 2022 Gates-WHO-Hopkins tabletop and the current China pneumonia news stories.
Marvin Haberland is a German engineer who has worked out a way to get the virus existence issue into court to hopefully require virologists provide evidence that they followed the scientific method when they claimed that SARS-CoV-2 exists.
Recognized leaders of the ‘no-virus team’ (doctors Mark & Sam Bailey, Tom Cowan, Andy Kaufman) restate why they are still yet to receive any genuine scientific information to prove that any viruses actually exist, let alone cause disease in plants, animals, or people, so they can’t “unify” with those who are calling for unity saying we need to all be on the same side.
Why are we so brainwashed by the media? Why do we care more about reality shows than being poisoned with mercury in our vaccinations and fluoride in our water supply? We need to wake up and get the facts about our chemical manipulation before it’s too late.
Host Alec Zeck of The Way Forward presents a live summit to dissect and debunk the monkey business surrounding both monkeypox and the theory of pathogenic viruses at large.
Featuring Dr Tom Cowan, Dr Sam Bailey, Dr Andrew Kaufman, Christine Massey, Dr Kevin Corbett, Dr Mark Bailey, Mike Stone, Saeed Qureshi, Eric Coppolinio, Dr Amandha Vollmer
Scratchpad for Pox-Related shenanigan’s
Paul Cottrell & Amandha Vollmer debate the Germ vs Terrain theories on April 29 2022 – each presenting their individual cases for us to mull-over.
Just wanted to collect all interesting PCR-Test related videos on one page.
Nonprofit, made up of public health professionals, medical professionals, scientists, and journalists exists solely to obtain and disseminate the data relied upon by the FDA to license COVID-19 vaccines. The organization takes no position on the data other than that it should be made publicly available to allow independent experts to conduct their own review and analyses. Any data received will be made public on this website.
What are others saying that is apparently so dangerous that they need to be removed from the general public’s eyes whenever they’re mentioned?