[Debate] “Germ Theory” vs “Terrain Theory”

IN Contagion Myth
  • Updated:6 months ago
  • Reading Time:15Minutes
  • Post Words:3712Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

So rare to see a debate between Germ vs Terrain theories — (…so rare – this is the first I’ve ever seen, but since researching the links for this post, I found another and if I find any more I’ll link below). Here we have Paul Cottrell & Amandha Vollmer each presenting their individual cases for us to mull-over.

April 29, 2022: Rumble | Facebook | Twitter | Yummy.doctor

It’s a 2.5 hour debate, so I’m not going to transcribe this one lol, (a 20 min video generally takes me about 4 hours!)… but following is Amandha’s debate statements (that she kindly posted to her blog), and I’ll take a few notes from Paul Cottrell’s rebuttal – it’s not me being biased – I’m still on the fence / gathering all the information – it’s purely a “time-factor” – I’m not willing to dedicate precious time to transcribing a video of this length because it would probably take me a week.

Amandha Vollmer - Bio - Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine

Amandha Vollmer – Professional Holistic Practitioner

  • Degree of Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine from the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine in Toronto and a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Biotechnology from the University of Lethbridge.
  • Eclectic Holistic Health Practitioner, helping people to prevent disease and heal naturally for over 15 years.
  • Owns and operates YumNaturals Emporium (yumnaturals.store), in Ontario (Canada) where she designs and produces handcrafted, all-natural body care remedies, since 2012.
  • Vlogger at Yummy.Doctor.
  • Author of Healing with DMSO, a science-backed guide that will help readers understand how DMSO works, why it works, and the many ways we can harness its power to heal aches, pains, and other ailments, all in an easy-to-read and friendly way. She is passionate about health and truth and is not afraid to voice her opinion, candidly using humour to deliver the message. During these challenging times, she has been recognized as one of the brave souls to tell the truth about what’s really going on in the world, encouraging and empowering people to be their own master.
  • http://yumnaturals.store/
  • http://yummy.doctor/
  • http://healingwithdmso.com/
  • https://www.patreon.com/yumnaturals
  • Instagram: @amandhav
  • Facebook: Amanda Vollmer
  • Facebook page: @yumnaturals

Dr. Paul Cottrell - Bio - Medical school student & Researcher in chaos theory

Dr. Paul Cottrell is a medical school student and researcher in chaos theory

Amandha Vollmer - Opening Debate Statement

“The germ theory has been derived via a pseudoscientific sleight of hand with no validation. Doctors and scientists are indoctrinated into a germ theory dogma, akin to a religion, appealing to authority, with no valid science whatsoever to back up their beliefs. Germ theory history is rife with political involvement, fear based agendas, erroneous testing methods, racketeering, superstition, story telling, silencing of truth tellers, suppression or demonizing of alternative theories, destruction of natural medicine fields and of course massive profit agendas.

Those who were properly studying the bodily terrain in the late 1800s and early 1900s identified through important microscope inventions (ie the somatoscope), looked at the living blood and characterized a 16 stage microzyma somatid cycle which proved that our entire body is full of life and this life is pleomorphic.

Our own blood cells can change shape and function based on the pH of its environment into a white blood cell, into a bacteria, then into a yeast form, create a hyphae, a mold spore or even smaller particles that can look like what the modern world calls viruses.

Of course, the current magic show laboratory methods keep us far away from studying these processes of the living body and instead have created a cartoon world of CGI images, convoluted claims, raging assumptions, inverting the understanding of nature: that toxic, starved and damaged cells will breakdown into waste products, directly misunderstanding that germs are not the cause of disease, but the results of a disease process; germs as merely bodily symbiotes degrading or repairing dead, dying or damaged tissue created in acidic or otherwise altered terrain states, by lack of nutrition, and accumulation of poisons from stress, food, drugs, aerosols, vaccines and other environmental toxins.

No valid scientific claims have been made to prove contagion from either a bacterium or a virus.

No virus has ever been properly purified, isolated or shown to cause any disease.

Instead, we see word play, assumptions and misdirection with improper controls and erroneous testing methods such as fixing and staining, centrifugation, UV light exposure, heating, cooling, mixing samples with human and animal cells, and toxic additives such as antibiotics, cortisone and preservatives.

No proper controls or studies have been done to ensure that the methods themselves do not create waste particles via cytopathic effect they then cleverly characterize as viruses or other artefacts such as the infamous spike protein.

No infection study has been performed from a pure isolate of any germ.

In order to attempt to make a healthy host sick, there are always poisons and other tissue materials involved, and even then, the results do not adhere to Koch’s postulates or even the altered River’s Criteria, of which had to be designed in a hopeful attempt to manipulate the proofs to serve the theory, the very opposite of how the scientific method is to be observed.

Koch vs Rivers
  • Nucleic acid material is extracted through these centrifugation, antibody adhesion or gradient methods rather than filtration as the River’s criteria demands.
  • What they call virus isolates can contain RNA from human cells, animal cells, other cellular debris from organelles, fetal bovine serum, monkey kidney cells or anything inside the culture medium.
  • No controls are done to prove the RNA sample is not from these other materials nor created by the methods of culturing cells outside of the body themselves.
  • The remainder of the nucleoside characterization is done in a computer program, in silico, filling in the blanks of the genetic material, based on percentages and guestimates.
  • No studies show the mechanisms inside the living tissues, no controls are put into place to prove the particles are not lookalikes such as extracellular vesicles, exosomes, micelles, microvilli, clathrin-coated triskelions, somatids or other breakdown vesicles from the toxic process done to the sample.
  • No electron micrographs prove they have isolated a virus, so how can scientists claim they have one?

If doctors would take the time to properly study all the papers claiming to have isolated viruses they would focus on the methodology section where they would see the glaring problems I have just described.

The so called scientific papers vouching for two of these virus scams, SARS-Cov1 and SARS-Cov2 did not have proper controls, they did not satisfy Koch’s Postulates/ Rivers Criteria. These viruses have not been scientifically proven to exist, whatsoever.

Virology and the germ theory are a compete and utter sham and frankly, an embarrassment to higher intellect, intact history, advanced knowledge and true methods of returning the body to health that are not merely suppressive.

It is challenging for those invested in their careers to admit they have been party to a massive scientific fraud, which only holds us back from understanding the true nature of the terrain and how the body returns itself to homeostasis when supported in its cleansing methods (as symptoms are merely evidence of such) and fed with the proper biochemicals (meaning nutrition) to run the system optimally.

Educators like myself have put their careers and reputations on the line to expose these glaring gaps in the scientific literature and the germ theory scandal that has misled our world when the fraud began with con men and sloppy scientists like Enders, Louis Pasteur and Jenner.

The previous masters of terrain understanding are not taught in medical schools such as Bechamp, Naessans, Rife, Hillman, TC Fry and certainly not our modern ones like Robert O Young who has video proof of pleomorphic processes or our dear Dr. Stefan Lanka who has actually performed the proper control studies that prove the laboratory methods are responsible for these particle creations and that viruses simply, do not exist. (01) (02) (03) (04) (05) (06) (07) (08)

It is vital that we expose the real history of this con and the false scientific paradigm so that we can escape the constant fear promoting tyrannical control measures via fake pandemics using a manipulative PCR technique (and other testing illusions), take back our power and our health, to perform actual, rigorous non-industry backed science and to free our minds and our souls from these scammers, liars and manipulators.

Thank you.”

Amandha Vollmer - Concluding Debate Statement

“Bold claims require substantial evidence. When it comes to the belief that germs are the cause of disease, rather than the result of a disease process producing a cytopathic effect, the evidence should be simple to produce.

Remove the exudate from an individual with a specific set of symptoms, filter out the other materials, isolate, measure, weigh, categorize and take photographs of the germ in question, inoculate it into a healthy individual, this should produce the exact same symptoms, remove the exudate from that individual, filter out the materials, match the sample with the first sample and these should be identical.

Do this with a very large sample size. To date, we do not have these studies.

Instead we have a glaring lack of evidence, a fabrication of particles using computer models and toxic lab techniques, glaring leaps of logic in regard to cause and effect of a disease process in the living organism.

They say people can be asymptomatic carriers and this can make others sick, with no evidence of such.

We have a faulty explanation of contagion completely ignoring other possible trends to return the body to homeostasis such as pheromones, energy fields, familial lineage, common exposures to toxins, foods or stress, and cyclical triggers such as seasonal changes.

The modern medical model was based on Rockefeller medicine that bullied its way to the top using germ theory as its weapon and the Flexner report as its armor.

The one germ causing one disease idea is simply, a fallacy.

Those of us seasoned in natural healing practices know when we assist the body to cleanse itself and provide ample biochemical nutrition, clean water and other supportive determinants of health, such as rest, the body heals.

A recent study claims that of our 30 trillion human cells, we have on average about 39 trillion microbial cells. So by that measure, we’re only about 43% human, the rest are the germs. (09)

This information alone should make us pause to question the war we have waged for far too long in ignorance upon the micro-organisms that serve our lives.

It is time for a scientific revolution, as the wise author Thomas Kuhn predicted would come, as the truth can never die and eventually will always shine its light, hopefully this time in the halls of medicine and science, so that we can flourish once again with clear logic, true knowledge, vibrant health, and grounded awareness and never be tricked again by con men who use clever statistics and magic to lead us astray.” (10)

Paul Cottrell - Notes

Start of my notes:

  • When you do a chemical analysis of the Exosomes, they are not of the same chemical composition as viruses
  • An electron microscope image of an exosome will look different than a virus, in size and composition within the virion
  • Says this paper in Nature “Ultrastructural insight into SARS-CoV-2 entry and budding in human airway epithelium” shows the actual picture of the docking of SARS-Cov-2 – the virus that Baric made, docking on the actual epithelial tissue in the lung – the actual docking of the spike protein on the ACE-2 receptor in an electron microscope. (11)
  • Plethora of Scientific Journals that show pictures of viruses
  • If viruses don’t exist, why are we spending billions of dollars in weapons development, 11 x BSL 4 labs in USA. If viruses don’t exist, why does Ralph Baric’s CV show weapons development of SARS-CoV-2.
  • And Fauci gave him a million dollars in April of 2001 and SARS pops up in 2002 in November.
  • Believes SARS-CoV-2 is Baric playing in the laboratory with modern techniques.
  • Paper in 2008, that Dr Shi published that shows that she developed a chimera plasmid, mixed it with pseudo HIV and that led to the human ACE-2 jump from bats. If viruses didn’t exist, she wouldn’t be able to take pieces of SARS and put it into a plasmid and in the 293 stem cell line, create this monstrosity. (12)
  • Then do further development with Baric on the serial passage leading to the further lethality of SARS-CoV-2. (13) (14) (15) (16) (17)
  • We’re spending billions and billions of dollars on ‘exosome’ development?
  • Blast (in silico) and Sanger (method that doesn’t use a computer) matches
  • SARS-CoV-2 was isolated on Dec 19th, 2019 and published in Nature.
  • If you get SARS-CoV-2 and test positive with antigen test or PCR test – how do they tell what variant it is – alpha, beta, gamma, delta or omicron. What you do is take the remaining part of that sample, and run a sequence and then they would know what variant they have, in definition its been isolated in the sample.
  • Paper last year in Autopsy data showing that SARS-CoV-2 hides in tissue around the heart. Myocarditis.
  • Baric from 1986-1995 was using beta coronaviruses and studying myocarditis. There are a lot of dots that are connecting to viruses being created in Baric’s lab.

Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory Videos


Penny (PennyButler.com)
Penny (PennyButler.com)

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.