Today my heart was broken all over again about how corrupt humanity has become after finding study after study that had clear conflicts of interest - these should have red-flashing lights and warning signs all over it - or not approved at all!
When there is RISK there must be CHOICE. REAL people, REAL stories, REAL injuries.
Are our governments doing enough to alert us about the risks of Covid vaccines Pfizer, AstraZenica and Moderna? Since mid-2021 there has been a increasingly high number of "sudden and unexpected" deaths and collapses due to cardiac issues in sport. Stop automatically-calling "Coincidence" for any adverse reaction that could be related to a planetary-wide global rollout of experimental biologicals that are still in an ongoing clinical trial - especially when young athletes are not at risk of serious disease in the first place.
An interconnected web of relationships, family ties, government grants, funding from sponsors, DNA harvesting, security risks, foreign powers and criminal corporations with billions to spend.
Concerns and history of increased-risk of HIV in Adenovirus Ad5 Vaccines such as AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson
Back to Conflicts of Interest Australia COVID Policy [Part 1] Posts tagged: ATAGI, CSL, Doherty, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Back to Conflicts of Interest Australia COVID Policy [Part 1]
Well this is confusing and worrisome. I found a lot of people who had to amputate their legs or arms after getting the COVID vaccines. There is a couple that got the vaccine but didn't believe it could be related, and others that apparently weren't vaccinated and blame covid. Scratches head. Then there's a new story from yesterday about a man from NSW who had his leg amputated after the 2nd dose of AZ but then apparently contracted COVID in hospital and then was told by staff that he "could've got real sick" if he wasn't vaccinated. I'm so confused.
Clive Palmer, head of the United Australia Party, says that Berejiklian was promised that she would not be charged in a corruption probe if she imposed a vaccine mandate. She allegedly accepted that offer, and has since resigned from her position amid an apparent unrelated corruption investigation.
If the mainstream media was doing their job, this is what we should be talking about.
I remember when one or two of my friends were telling me sometime in 2021 about the origins of the pandemic and the hidden dangers of the vaccines. I didn’t take them too seriously, thinking that they had gone a tad too far down the conspiratorial road. However, out of a mixture of curiosity and duty to myself, I decided to do some research – with the view that I’d be able to determine that they’d been victims of too much-sensationalised information. Given that I used to head up the R&D division of a $700-million organisation, and that I’ve managed a wide variety of literally hundreds of corporate projects, I figured that it was a challenge that I could take on. Also, given that I have an engineering PhD that has helped me think critically, and that I’m very much a “show me the facts” type of guy, I figured that it wouldn’t be difficult to put any and all crazy conspiracies to bed.
Fact-Checkers are the new "Digital Police" to make the new hive-mind more believable - it's all rigged - and whilst it should've been our "trusted source" during a pandemic, they are the biggest disruption to truth as they are aligned to a completely different agenda.
Just having a look at the listed conflicts on the AZ trials paper