Safe And Effective: A Second Opinion (2022 Oracle Films COVID-19 Documentary)
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also to takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them.
- Rumble | Rumble-Mirror | Odysee |
YouTube| Vimeo| Facebook | Telegram | OracleFilms.com
“Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion” contrasts the official statements of medical authorities in the United Kingdom with emerging research that is bringing the logic and ongoing impacts of lockdowns, school closures, mask-wearing, PCR tests, and other non-pharmaceutical interventions into question.
“We look at leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in suppressing free and open debate on the subject”.
- Growing evidence the jab can have devastating consequences
- Those injured by the vaccine feel unrecognized and abandoned by the NHS and the government they trusted.
- Most of the vaccine-injured profiled in the documentary were at very little risk from the illness in the first place.
Alex Mitchell, 57, suffered blood clots following a dose of AstraZeneca’s vaccine requiring amputation of his left leg. Mitchell was compensated the maximum amount for a COVID-19 vaccine injury in the UK, £120,000. He is now going blind and sarcastically thanks “AstraZeneca – for the “gift that keeps on giving”.
Caroline Pover, 50, who has a pickling business, writes books, and is a public speaker, got the vaccine in order to make her annual trip to Japan. After taking the AstraZeneca vaccine, she spent five months in bed – exhausted, in relentless pain, and debilitated by brain fog. She now helps other vaccine-injured.
Genevieve Florence, 24, was an actress, synchronized swimmer, and cliff-jumper. She felt her life was over because she has not been able to do even the simplest things for herself.
Georgia Segal, 35, collapsed after her second dose of the Pfizer shot. The vaccine caused some kind of neurological damage that made her body seize and took away her ability to walk. Segal has video footage from when suffering was at its worst.
John Watt’s: Before the jab, tattooed and muscled, gym junkie, clearly very fit. A picture of John and his fiancée before John’s illness appears, the two of them looking blissfully happy and healthy.
Then we see him lying in bed, his eyes covered, slurred speech, diagnosed with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, also known as POTS. He can hardly stand without sending his heart into fits. This big, strong weightlifter tried to suppress sobs as he said, “This is my life now,” indicating his legs stretched on the bed in front of him, propped on a pillow. “Stuck in my bed every day with no help from anybody.” He lifts his sunglasses to wipe away tears before continuing. “I can’t live like this. I can’t live my life in bed. I’m only 36 years of age. I’m supposed to get married this year.”
Maxwell Harrison, 22, was a talented ballroom dancer (32nd in the world) who thought he would die after the Pfizer vaccine caused so much damage to his heart. He can no longer dance or move quickly without his blood pressure sky-rocketing. He is 22 years old.
Stephen Wright, 32, was not so lucky. About to start a new job as a senior clinical psychologist when he received the AstraZeneca vaccine, but after the jab, he suffered a stroke and died. The night he died, he was helping his wife, Charlotte, put their children to bed. Charlotte had to use the local food bank for months to feed herself and her children. Eventually, Charlotte Wright, too, received the £120,000 maximum compensation for the loss of her husband. The government compensation, Wright said, is some vindication but is not enough and will never be enough.
Millions of COVID vaccine injuries and deaths are being reported through official channels across the world. For many people featured in the film, their injuries have been so severe that they’ve struggled to believe their lives will ever be worth living again.
Unfortunately, their medical doctors have made it worse. “The doctors don’t know what to do with us,” Pover said. Instead of sympathy and a treatment protocol, conventional doctors often dismiss these patients’ COVID-19 vaccine injuries. Some even accuse patients of being mentally ill.
While profiling the injured, the film intersperses straightforward facts from several preeminent scientists and clinicians, including:
- Dr. Aseem Malhotra, cardiologist
- Dr. Clare Craig, diagnostic pathologist
- Alexandra Latypova, a retired pharmaceutical industry executive who specialized in clinical trials.
Malhotra was among the first to be double vaccinated (with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine). However, he said, after doing months of data analysis on both the vaccines and the illness, speaking to medical scientists from Oxford, Stanford, and Harvard, two investigative journalists, and two whistleblowers from Pfizer, he has concluded “reluctantly” that the vaccine is “not completely safe and has unprecedented harms.” He called for an immediate halt to vaccination until the data can be properly analyzed. Malhotra believes that the spike protein itself is likely the mechanism through which the vaccines cause harm.
Latypova reviewed the data Pfizer was forced to release as a result of litigation. She said Pfizer skipped important steps in safety testing. For instance, the toxicity of the COVID-19 vaccine’s mRNA active ingredient, the spike protein, was never studied.
The FDA and Pfizer knew there were toxicity issues with gene therapy medicines as well, the film contends. The CDC, FDA, and Pfizer lied when they insisted the vaccine stayed near the injection site.
Indeed, as Malhotra explained, the spike protein “appears to be distributed throughout the body, in every major organ system, for several months, causing a direct reaction—through toxicity—or an autoimmune reaction.”
The film goes on to detail conflicts of interest that pervade the regulatory agencies.
As well as the deceptive way relative risk reduction is used to not only coerce vaccination, but to get the jab approved in the first place.
The “only one narrative allowed” – “all reading from the same script” used by the media and tech corps.
The collusion between government and tech giants to crack down on so-called misinformation.
The doubling of Pfizer’s revenue from 2020 to $81 billion in 2021, whilst giving them indemnity against coughing up compensation for vaccine-injuries.
The “SAGE” government advise to scare the shit out of the world in order to keep them locked down and terrified, and the media fear campaigns based on that advice.
And the increasingly hostile messaging as many people refused to line up for the vaccines. “No Jab, No Job,” read a Daily Mail headline.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson referred to “anti-vaxxers”—already a slur—as “nutjobs,” and Tony Blair went so far as to say, “Frankly, if you’re not vaccinated at the moment . . . you’re not just irresponsible, I mean you’re an idiot.”
The mainstream media, in collusion with Big Tech and Big Government, has successfully presented a cartoonishly simple “safe and effective” picture for a long time.
But not anymore. This film, along with myriad lawsuits, new research that shows no benefit of COVID-19 boosters for young people, and calls for public health to be held to higher standards of accountability and ethics, suggest a reckoning is coming soon.
We hope “Safe and Effective” will help public health look at itself in the mirror and finally admit these vaccines were a colossal mistake.
Epoch Times: Safety First, Except When It Comes To Vaccines: New Documentary
I just joined Gettr and I highly recommend it - it's the best alternative to them all so far:
Telegram Channels: Get Post Updates | Chat/Comment | Video Evidence | c19 Images/Memes