Dr Mark Hobart explains new Australian law to control doctors for good (California is also doing this)

  • Updated:1 year ago
  • Reading Time:5Minutes
  • Post Words:1269Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dr Mark Hobart explains a new law being introduced right now in Australia – that is more draconian than we’ve seen so far… to keep those doctors under total control…

Facebook | Rumble | Telegram


Dr Mark Hobart, Dr William Bay, Graham Hood former Qantas Pilot, and paramedic John Larter

Do you want doctors to be able to do what they think is right for their patients? To voice concerns if they have any? Or do you want them to be gagged by policy, forbidden to express any concerns and blindly take orders from governments and bureaucrats?

“Forget medical training, experience, and ethics.”

We all know they censored our doctors all over the world the past few years… but it didn’t stop almost a million doctors from speaking out…. but it’s about to get much worse for those who still have their job….

Doctors With Voices 3/10/22
Drs Mark Hobart and William Bay speak urgently about legislation that will soon be passed that will deny Informed Consent, second opinion, and open medical debate.
Wake up Australia. ~ Hoody and Johnny.

  • What is AFRA?
    • AFRA is the Australian Federal Relations Architecture. It is an illegal Australian Constitution.


In lockstep, there are probably many countries and states following suit as I just noticed that California is doing the same:

California “AB 2098” bill calls for the state’s medical board to revoke the license of any physician who expresses an opinion “contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus to the standard of care.”

Not sure which genius came up with that bill but to pretend there is a “scientific consensus” on a novel disease and a novel gene therapy is absurd. That is not how science works. Medicine is (was?) constantly trying to increase its knowledge base throughout history.

  • In fact, one of the core responsibilities of a physician is not just to care for a patient as their “primary consideration” but also to add knowledge to the discipline and to teach it to others.
    • Here is another responsibility articulated in the Hippocratic Oath written around the 4th century BC: Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course.
      • Whoa. Hippocrates was warning us 24 centuries ago about the situation of being asked to administer poisonsWow.

Anyway, what is medical consensus – is it state-wide, national or international?

  • I am sure there are more than a couple of California doctors (or maybe not) whose opinions conflict with the captured Federal health agencies but are instead supported by academies of scientists and health agencies in other countries.
  • Or even states like Tennessee that made ivermectin legally available over the counter to its citizens! 
  • Denmark long ago restricted any person under 30 from getting the Moderna “vaccine.”
    • In the US we now give it to toddlers. I repeat, in the US, we now give it to toddlers.
      • If I object to injecting toddlers with Moderna, using the same “science” that Denmarks authorities are using, am I then a misinformationist who should not be allowed to practice medicine? 
        • What would happen to me if I go even further and espouse Denmark’s latest guidance, which is to not recommend COVID mRNA vaccination to any low risk individual under 50?

The scariest part of that legislation to me is that it reflects a complete ignorance of decades of evidence demonstrating that our Federal Health Agencies are under regulatory capture by the Pharmaceutical Industry.

  • Just look at all the shenanigans the PFDA (the P is not a typo) pulled to sell the most vaccines.
    • The below policies were all written by the Pharmaceutical Industry and issued by the PFDA, yet California doctors who know this and try to warn their patients in order to protect them from the evils of that industry could lose their license. 

Testing is no longer indicated for those who have received COVID mRNA vaccination (luckily this one didn’t last very long).

Testing for antibodies to assess prior exposure to COVID is not recommended prior to administering COVID mRNA vaccination.

  • They literally tried to avoid gathering data that would prove the vaccines were ineffective.
  • Then they literally established that natural immunity should be ignored. 
  • With no data to support those “standards.”

One of the greatest absurdities in the history of medicine was the fact that the entire health system started vaccinating people right after they recovered from COVID.

  • They didn’t even wait for the variant to change first.
    • But, if you publicly express a difference of opinion with this expert approach to managing an infectious disease, your livelihood could be taken away from you.

Seriously? What is happening in America? This is absolutely terrifying stuff. 

Further, in order to establish a “true” consensus and/or standard of care guideline it has been estimated to require numerous studies over an average of 17 years.

  • So, am I not allowed to voice an opinion until 17 years of studies pass?
    • In a novel pandemic in which insights and data accumulate rapidly?
  • What if I am an expert way ahead of the curve based on research I am doing and/or the ever-evolving data and insights I gain from treating patients with this novel disease.
    • Should I be quiet for 17 years until such a time when my insights and expertise are more widely established and accepted?
      • How will our silence ever get us to that consensus?
    • How will my patients fare during that time?
      • Stay home, wait until your lips turn blue because I am not allowed to have an opinion or practice in treating you if it differs from either non-treatment or giving pathetic Paxlovid, a drug which has one mechanism of action identical to that of just one of ivermectin’s many mechanisms. This is exhausting. 

And should I ignore the decades of examples of corruption of the medical sciences via its journals and research funding?

  • The vehicles that have propagated guidelines on any number of fraudulent medications (SSRI’s, statins, Xygris, Oxycontin, Vioxx, Bextra, Avandia and many more)?
    • Should I be silent until those frauds are more widely exposed? 
      • Think about all the doctors who saved their patients from those frauds despite being propagated as “medical consensus” at the time?

A free and open scientific debate, championing those voices without conflicts of interest is what is needed.

  • Instead this bill will silence those without conflicts while further amplifying the media megaphone of vaccine manufacturer CEO’s.
    • These are dark dark times.
      • This bill will lead to even more morbidity and mortality, not only in COVID, but in other diseases as well.

Pharma already controls the medical journals and Federal Health agencies.

  • But they don’t control independent physician’s opinions and voices.
    • Well, at least they didn’t until now. 

Dr Pierre Kory

Posts tagged ‘Conflict$

Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.