Suspicious Patents

IN Graphene

I know there’s over a million patents involved but I should start at least documenting some of them on the one page instead of spread-out throughout the blog – it would take decades to locate & record all the nefarious patents considering how big this octopus is and how much we’ve been lied to… maybe this collection will help someone else who is already looking. I also have several folders of suspicious patents on Mega.

Living document. First published June 1, 2022. Last Updated June 21, 2022

Patents to add at a later date when I have more time

Just want to note here the patents I need to add here to remind myself when I’m not trying to do 2,000 things at once.

  • The rest of the Microsoft patents
  • The rest of the Rockefellers patents
  • The rest of the mind-control patents
  • The bio-surveillance patents
  • The geo-engineering patents
  • The mosquito bio-weapon patents
  • Blocking out the sun patents
  • Graphene-Saline patent
  • Compliance pills patents
  • I want to look for the quad flu shot patents
  • Crispr & gene-editing patents
  • PCR & RAT Tests
  • Ventilators & Remdesivir
  • Pfizer, Moderna, AZ, J&J

There are more suspicions patents listed on these posts that I’ll move here when I have time:

Patents - Over 48,000 Patents for 'Graphene Oxide Vaccine'

A Google Patent search alone for “graphene oxide vaccine” brought up over 45,000 results last year.

That same search on March 26, 2022 brought up 47,502 results. and today (June 1, 2022) it’s grown to 48,110 results.

Who has time to go through all those patents?

Here are Four Graphene Oxide Patent Analysis by Mik Andersen: (01)

  1. Recombinant nanocoronavirus vaccine that takes graphene oxide as a carrier” – Analysis (02)
  2. Graphene oxide in physiological serums: scope for public health – Analysis (04)
  3. Graphene patents for fertilizers and phytosanitary products: Part 1. Pseudomonas aeruginosa – Analysis (06)
  4. Graphene patents for fertilizers and phytosanitary products: Part 2 Confirmation of the hypothesis (08)
    • Patent (KR20210040597A. 김장호; 박선호. 2019)
    • Patent (CN106747954A. 张青; 卢瑞; 田裕; 宝刘; 玉生. 2017)
    • Patent (CN108925577A.林荣铨. 2018)
    • Patent (CN112293419A. 李雪松; 程鹏; 刘富康. 2021)
    • Patent (CN108782610A.林荣铨. 2018)
    • Patent (CN111149798A. 贾金亮; 胡鹏通; 徐汉虹; 朱丽; 郑烽. 2020)

More Graphene-Vaccine Patents

Patent - Food Packaging with Graphene Oxide
Rothschild - PCR COVID-19 Detection

Rothschilds Patented Covid-19 Biometric Tests in 2015 and 2017.

First Registration: Netherlands, Oct. 13, 2015

Fact-Checkers say this date claim is false because it’s part of a “family of patents” and whilst the family of patents part is true, the 2015/2016 patents are supposedly attached to US201562240783P / US201615293211A, which doesn’t seem to exist (or at least I can’t find them – or maybe it’s something to do with some kind of application process – I’ll ask my friend – a patent expert – in daylight hours).

2015-10-13 Priority to US201562240783P
2016-10-13 Priority to US201615293211A
2017-04-24 Priority to US15/495,485
2019-02-11 Priority to US16/273,141
2019-12-05 Priority to US16/704,844
2020-05-17 Priority to US16/876,114
2020-05-17 Application filed by Richard A. ROTHSCHILD
2020-09-03 Publication of US20200279585A1
2021-06-01 Application granted
2021-06-01 Publication of US11024339B2

Patent Abstract:

A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19. The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone. To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user. Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19. Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions.

Regardless of the “Date” controversy…

It’s got a lot of information about personal biometric surveillance data written throughout that probably should have our attention also.

For example, in one section it talks about “the biometric data is stored in memory and linked to the identifier… this allows the biometric data to be linked to video data upon playback”, and has subsections involving video and audio data that is stored in memory and linked to other data “uniquely identifying the session via a globally unique identifier (GUID), and an activity identifier“.

God only knows what this patent is really about or whether any of this is actually being used anywhere, but it smells of total surveillance and control, this obsession with collecting our biodata and connecting things up to the cloud. And my suspicious mind wonders if its more of a stop-gap, to stop people (or profit from people, or sue people) from developing apps that use biometric data for COVID-19? I don’t know, I’m tired, it’s late.

Microsoft - famous 666 Biometric Crytocurrency patent

In June 2019, (published on the 26th of March, 2020) Microsoft patented the now infamous and extremely Suspicious 060606 patent linking biometric data to Cryptocurrency.

Microsoft (Bill Gates) has patented a cryptocurrency mining system that leverages human activities, including brain waves and body heat, when performing online tasks such as using search engines, chatbots, and reading ads. “a user can solve the computationally difficult problem unconsciously“.

The patent describes a system where a device can verify whether “the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.

Different types of sensors can be used to “measure or sense body activity or scan human body,” the patent explains. They include “functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanners or sensors, electroencephalography (EEG) sensors, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) sensors, heart rate monitors, thermal sensors, optical sensors, radio frequency (RF) sensors, ultrasonic sensors, cameras, or any other sensor or scanner” that will do the same job.

Sidenote.. and I’m “sure it’s nothing” / and “just another coincidence”… / but they brought in $100 BILLION to invest in total surveillance & quarantine – something we never needed, and something that has been completely abused.

H.R. 6666 (116th): COVID-19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act

This bill would provide $100 billion in grants to faith-based organization, clinics, medical centers, and other organization which perform testing for COVID–19, tracing of exposure to COVID–19, or services for individuals who are isolating at home. The funding could be used to pay their staff or purchase personal protective equipment to protect their staff.

Coronavirus - Pirbright - Pilgrim Society

In 2018, “Coronavirus” was patented by the Pirbright Institute, which is connected to Rothschild again, Wellcome, and Gates, etc. but also with the Pilgrim Society (…if NWO had a list of names…)

(I’ll do a post on this soon, not tonight though – but if you have downloaded my research, you already have some of the information – search for NWO Pilgrims Society).

So the above connections is critical, not what the fact-checkers are trying to debunk, the above is important

Fact-checkers mislead readers by misdirection pointing out that it’s not “the” covid-19 coronavirus, but “a” coronavirus – and saying that it’s a “weakened form” of the virus that can be used for vaccines… which is written in the abstract also:

In addition, unless some other law has passed recently that I don’t know about “You cannot patent nature“.

So if ‘coronaviruses’ are ‘viruses that are naturally-occurring’, how did they succeed in getting a patent called “Coronavirus” (if it’s a ‘modified Coronavirus’- how did they get dibs on the name “Coronavirus”?)

You may think this is a stupid question from someone that doesn’t understand the science or what I’m reading (and that’s possible) but it’s a serious question because:

  • Even if it’s a weaker form (which I don’t believe), if it’s a different “version” of Coronavirus (for lack of a better word), why would you be able to patent “Coronavirus”?
  • If “Coronaviruses” occur in nature, then you wouldn’t be able to patent it, but if it’s some kind of unique and different thing they’ve created – a man-made “invention”, then wouldn’t you use a different word to describe your unique invention?
  • Put another way..
    • if I created a unique version of a “Pine Cone” in the lab, could I patent the word “Pine Cone”?
    • if I modify anything of nature – a raspberry – can I patent “raspberry”?

(Do you get what I’m asking?)

Charles Lieber - NIH - DARPA | nanosensors and semiconductors in vaccines

Charles Lieber has 66 patents which are being used as scaffolds and wires and nanosensors and semiconductors in all vaccines as described here. (23)

At the beginning of the pandemic if you remember, Charles Lieber, a Harvard nanotechnology researcher with decades of experience, was indicted by the DOJ for fraud in collaboration with the Wuhan University of Technology.  (24)

Charles Lieber received millions of dollars in grant money from the US Department of Defence, specifically the military think tanks DARPA, AFOSR, and ONR, as well as NIH and MITRE. His specialty is the use of silicon nanowires in lieu of patch clamp electrodes to monitor and modulate intracellular activity, something he has been working on at Harvard for the past twenty years.

He was claimed to have been working on silicon nanowire batteries in China, but none of his colleagues can recall him ever having worked on battery technology in his life; all of his research deals with bionanotechnology, or the blending of nanotech with living cells.

Charles Lieber’s own papers describe the use of silicon nanowires for brain-computer interfaces, or “neural lace” technology. His papers describe how neurons can endocytose whole silicon nanowires or parts of them, monitoring and even modulating neuronal activity.

Charles Lieber was a colleague of Robert Langer (an expert in nanotech drug delivery) and who is one of the co-founders of Moderna.

Both Charles Lieber and Robert Langer’s bibliographies describe, essentially, techniques for human enhancement, i.e. transhumanism.

Charles Lieber has worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, and according to the press-release video above, was paid one and a half million dollars to setup a research lab in Wuhan, China, at the same time as receiving research grants from Harvard & NIH. (25)

One of his Patents is for Nanobots (‘nanoscale devices’) with “ballistic transport” for which “carriers can be injected” that can include metal electrodes including nickel, gold, silver, copper, zinc, cadmium, iron, nickel, cobalt, aluminum, chromium, platinum, tungsten, or the like.

It also gives an example that ‘an electrode or other device may be in electrical communication with both the nanoscale wire and the non-nanoscale electrical contact, where the junctions between such components are not Schottky barriers’ (energy barriers for electrons).

The invention includes a method for preparing nanostructures. And that nanoscale wires can be “grown” using chemical vapor depositions and that the nanoscale wires can also be “doped” by introducing the doping element into the vapor phase reactant, and more… read the patent here:

NIH-funded Nanotechnology patents by Charles Lieber

NIH-funded Nanotechnology Patents has Charles Lieber’s name all over them:

  1. US7956427B2 – US Patent 7,956,427 – Nanosensors (27)
    • Electrical devices comprised of nanowires are described, along with methods of their manufacture and use. The nanowires can be nanotubes and nanowires. The surface of the nanowires may be selectively functionalized. Nanodetector devices are described.
    • This invention was made with government support under DBI-98346603 awarded by the National Science Foundation, N00014-00-1-0476 awarded by the Office of Naval Research, and CA091357 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
    • US7911009B2 – US Patent 7,911,009 – Nanosensors
    • US7619290B2 – US Patent 7,619,290 – Nanosensors
  2. US9702849B2 – US Patent 9,702,849 – Nanopore sensing by local electrical potential measurement (28)
    • There is provided a nanopore disposed in a support structure, with a fluidic connection between a first fluidic reservoir and an inlet to the nanopore and a second fluidic connection between a second fluidic reservoir and an outlet from the nanopore…  
    • This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. 5DP1OD003900 awarded by the NIH. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
  3. US10436747B2 – US Patent 10,436,747 – Nanopore sensing by local electrical potential measurement (29)
    • There is provided a method for sensing the translocation of a molecule through a nanopore. In the method, there is directed to an inlet of a nanopore a molecule that is disposed in a first ionic solution of a first ionic concentration…
    • This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. 5DP1OD003900 awarded by the National Institute of Health. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
  4. US10369255B2 – US Patent 10,369,255 – Scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components for cells, tissues, and other applications (30)
    • The present invention generally relates to nanoscale wires and tissue engineering. In various embodiments, cell scaffolds for growing cells or tissues can be formed that include nanoscale wires that can be connected to electronic circuits extending externally of the cell scaffold. The nanoscale wires may form an integral part of cells or tissues grown from the cell scaffold, and can even be determined or controlled, e.g., using various electronic circuits…
    • This invention was made with government support under 5DP1OD003900-04 awarded by National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
    • US10355229B2 – US Patent 10,355,229 – Methods and systems for scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components
    • US9786850B2 – US Patent 9,786,850 – Methods and systems for scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components
  5. US9638717B2 – US Patent 9,638,717 – Nanoscale sensors for intracellular and other applications (31)
    • The present invention generally relates to nanoscale wires for use in sensors and other applications. In various embodiments, a probe comprising a nanotube (or other nanoscale wire) is provided that can be directly inserted into a cell to determine a property of the cell, e.g., an electrical property. 
    • This invention was made with government support under Grant No. 5DP10D003900 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The U.S. government has certain rights in the invention.
  6. US9595685B2 – US Patent 9,595,685 – Nanoscale wires, nanoscale wire FET devices, and nanotube-electronic hybrid devices for sensing and other applications (32)
    • The present invention generally relates to nanotechnology, including field effect transistors and other devices used as sensors (for example, for electrophysiological studies), nanotube structures, and applications. Certain aspects of the present invention are generally directed to transistors such as field effect transistors, and other similar devices. In one set of embodiments, a field effect transistor is used where a nanoscale wire, for example, a silicon nanowire, acts as a transistor channel connecting a source electrode to a drain electrode…
    • This invention was made with government support under Grant No. 5DP1OD003900 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
  7. US9457128B2 – US Patent 9,457,128 – Scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components for cells, tissues, and other applications (33)
    • The present invention generally relates to nanoscale wires and tissue engineering. In various embodiments, cell scaffolds for growing cells or tissues can be formed that include nanoscale wires that can be connected to electronic circuits extending externally of the cell scaffold. The nanoscale wires may form an integral part of cells or tissues grown from the cell scaffold, and can even be determined or controlled, e.g., using various electronic circuits…
    • Research leading to various aspects of the present invention was sponsored, at least in part, by the NIH, Grant No. 5DP1OD003900-04. The U.S. Government has certain rights in the invention.
  8. US6716409B2 – US Patent 6,716,409 – Fabrication of nanotube microscopy tips (34)
    • A method of fabricating SWNT probes for use in atomic force microscopy is disclosed. In one embodiment, the SWNT’s are fabricated using a metallic salt solution. In another embodiment, the SWNT’s are fabricated using metallic colloids.
    • This invention was made with government support under Grant Nos. F49620-97-1-0005 and F49620-97-1-0084 awarded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research; and Grant No. GM59666 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.

NIH - Rockefeller - Remote-Control Cells

Patents by Rockefeller University (I haven’t done a search for this yet to see how many there are – I suspect hundreds – I randomly came across this one today which I thought I’d note):

  • US10786570B2 – Ferritin nanoparticle compositions and methods to modulate cell activity (35)
    • The present invention provides methods and compositions for the remote control of cell function based on the use of radiofrequency waves to excite nanoparticles targeted to specific cell types. The nanoparticles may be applied to the target cell extracellularly and/or expressed intracellularly. The cell type of interest expresses a temperature sensitive channel wherein excitation of the nanoparticles results in a localized temperature increase that is transduced into a cellular response. Such cellular responses may include, for example, increases in gene expression resulting in production of one or more physiologically active proteins. The expression of such proteins can be used to treat a variety of different inherited or acquired diseases or disorders in a subject. Accordingly, the invention provides a generic approach for treatment of any disease associated with a protein deficiency.
    • The invention disclosed herein was made with United States Government support under NIH Grant No. RO1 GM095654 from the National Institutes of Health. Accordingly, the United States Government has certain rights in this invention.

NIH - NIAID - Anthony Fauci - Dr Ralph Baric

Anthony Fauci, NIH / NIAID, Gain of Function (Bioweapon) Research, massive amounts of conflict$ with all the pharma arms and blah blah blah – just like Gates, Fauci’s hands are all over everything to do with this pandemic.

I know I have a few PDFs somewhere full of the patents, so don’t think this is a full list, this is just a “I have this page open so I’m noting it” – but the Fauci/COVID Dossier is one of them that I can list right now.

The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08, issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. (36)

As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit. (Source: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 2000) In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full-length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.

  • See My Pandemic Timeline (June 2021) for when I started noting down all the Bioweapon / Fauci connections – mostly redundant now but shows the kind of information MSM was feeding us back then, that still showed truth in between all the lies.
  • See posts tagged “Fauci

NIH - Remote Control of Cell Function using Magnetic Field

  • WO2016049031A1 – Compositions and methods to modulate cell activity (39)
    • The present invention provides methods and compositions for the remote control of cell function based on the use of a magnetic field to excite paramagnetic nanoparticles targeted to specific cell types. The cell type of interest expresses an ion channel wherein excitation of the paramagnetic nanoparticles results in a physical change that is transduced into a cellular response. Such cellular responses may include, for example, increases in gene expression resulting in production of one or more physiologically active proteins. The expression of such proteins can be used to treat a variety of different inherited or acquired diseases or disorders in a subject.
    • This invention was made with government support under NIH Grant No. R01 GM095654 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
      • The present invention provides methods and compositions for the remote control of cell function based on the use of radiofrequency waves or a magnetic field to excite endogenous paramagnetic nanoparticles produced by specific cell types. The cells express a set of DNA constructs that direct the expression of a temperature sensitive and/or mechanosensitive channel wherein excitation of the paramagnetic metal nanoparticles results in a physical change that is transduced into a cellular response by induction of the influx of ions

DARPA - Body-Monitoring the Bloodstream & Stimulating Nerves & Organs

I have much more on DARPA’s investments in remote-controlling humans in another post (that is still in draft-mode).

DARPA’s ElectRx program (Electric Prescriptions) is funding research into tiny embedded devices that can monitor conditions inside the body and stimulate particular nerves in response, “enhancing the body’s self-healing abilities”. DARPA is examining health on a nano scale through its electrical prescriptions (ElectRx) program. (40) (41)

  • “Imagine a device far tinier, that could be delivered through a needle. This device could be designed to constantly monitor certain conditions in the body, and then directly stimulate certain nerve pathways to trigger the body’s correct response mechanism when it’s not working as it should be. Let’s say blood sugar regulation isn’t working properly in a diabetic – this technology could potentially detect a blood sugar level anomaly and trigger the pancreas to release glucagon or insulin to sort it out”.
  • As tiny as a single nerve fibre, an ElectRx device would sit in the body monitoring the bloodstream or electrical environment for a particular signal, at which point it would stimulate a targeted nerve in order to produce a desired outcome. The possibilities are incredibly broad, both good and bad.

Here’s some examples the ElextRx program is funding research into:

  • Investigating whether direct triggering of the spleen or other organs could help treat rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions.
  • Investigating whether inflammation control in the brain could help treat depression
  • Investigating whether the management of neurochemicals that regulate learning and memory in the brain could offer new treatments for post-traumatic stress and other mental health disorders
  • Investigating thermal activation of the adrenal gland
  • Investigating the stimulation of the vagal nerve to induce neural plasticity for the treatment of post-traumatic stress

A military research organization wouldn’t be throwing some 78.9 million US dollars at something that didn’t have some tantalizing potential on the battlefield. 

  • For starters, if you put these things in people you like, you can do all sorts of positive things. But a targeted nerve stimulation device could also do all sorts of horrible things if implanted in somebody you’re less fond of, from straight out pain generation to emotional manipulation to all kinds of physical maladies.
  • Then there’s the super-soldier potential. Controlling hormones and brain chemistry could help put soldiers in an ideal emotional and physiological state for certain operations or training exercises. And while these things could clearly be useful, I’m not sure how comfortable I’d be letting anyone’s government put them in my body.

DARPA’s first seven grants under the ElectRx program announced in 2015: (42)

  • Circuit Therapeutics (Menlo Park, Calif.), a start-up co-founded by Karl Deisseroth and Scott Delp, is a new DARPA performer. The team plans to further develop its experimental optogenetic methods for treating neuropathic pain, building toward testing in animal models before seeking to move to clinical trials in humans.
  • A team at Columbia University (New York), led by Elisa Konofagou, will pursue fundamental science to support the use of non-invasive, targeted ultrasound for neuromodulation. The team aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms that may make ultrasound an option for chronic intervention, including activation and inhibition of nerves.
  • A team at the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (Parkville, Australia), led by John Furness, is a first-time DARPA performer. Team members will seek to map the nerve pathways that underlie intestinal inflammation, with a focus on determining the correlations between animal models and human neural circuitry. They will also explore the use of neurostimulation technologies based on the cochlear implant —developed by Cochlear, Inc. to treat hearing loss, but adapted to modulate activity of the vagus nerve in response to biofeedback signals—as a possible treatment for inflammatory bowel disease.
  • A team at the Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore), led by Jiande Chen, aims to explore the root mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease and the impact of sacral nerve stimulation on its progression. The team will apply a first-of-its-kind approach to visualize intestinal responses to neuromodulation in animal models.
  • A team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, Mass.), led by Polina Anikeeva, will aim to advance its established work in magnetic nanoparticles for localized, precision in vivo neuromodulation through thermal activation of neurons in animal models. The team’s work will target the adrenal gland and the splanchnic nerve circuits that govern its function. To increase specificity and minimize potential side effects of this method of stimulation, the team seeks to develop nanoparticles with the ability to bind to neuronal membranes. Dr. Anikeeva was previously a DARPA Young Faculty Awardee.
  • A team at Purdue University (West Lafayette, Ind.), led by Pedro Irazoqui, will leverage an existing collaboration with Cyberonics to study inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and its responsiveness to vagal nerve stimulation through the neck. Validation of the mechanistic insights that emerge from the effort will take place in pre-clinical models in which novel neuromodulation devices will be applied to reduce inflammation in a feedback-controlled manner. Later stages of the effort could advance the design of clinical neuromodulation devices.
  • A team at the University of Texas, Dallas, led by Robert Rennaker and Michael Kilgard, will examine the use of vagal nerve stimulation to induce neural plasticity for the treatment of post-traumatic stress. As envisioned, stimulation could enhance learned behavioral responses that reduce fear and anxiety when presented with traumatic cues. Dr. Rennaker is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran who served in Liberia, Kuwait and Yugoslavia.

Brain Hacking via the Vagus Nerve (43)

  • Referring to the “Circuit Therapeutics” grant above, this feature article writes: “A new kind of medicine: an electrical therapy as benign as a morning swim and as straightforward as popping a pill with your coffee.”
    • “A new technique that inserts light-sensitive proteins into neurons and then uses pulses of light to turn those neurons “on” and “off.” Under the DARPA grant, the researchers will try to use pulses of light to alter neural circuits involved in neuropathic pain.”
    • The final project will rely on magnetic fields to activate neurons, using a technique that could be called “magnetogenetics.” An MIT team will insert heat-sensitive proteins into neurons, and will then deploy magnetic nanoparticles that bind to the surface of those neurons. When exposed to a magnetic field, these nanoparticles heat up and activate the neurons to which they’re attached.

In 2017: Military magnetic field breakthrough could lead to mind reading computers and Harry Potter ‘wands’ to check for head injuries (44)

  • DARPA’s new project aims to focus on detecting superweak magnetic fields 
  • The research could let medics rapidly diagnose concussions on the battlefield
  • It could also lead to brain-machine interfaces for controlling prosthetic limbs and external machines through the magnetic signals associated with thought
  • DARPA’s new Atomic Magnetometer for Biological Imaging in Earth’s Native Terrain (AMBIIENT) program aims to bring about a new era in which brain imaging such as magnetoencephalography (MEG’s) and heart screening tests such as magnetocardiography (MCGs’) become more practical for a wide range of applications. 

Karen Kingston | Patents of Evil Intent - Pfizer, Moderna

Karen Kingston – former Pfizer employee and biotech analyst.

Karen Kingston is a Biotech Analyst and yet another former Pfizer employee who is speaking out. She began her career as a Pfizer sales rep in NYC. She’s a pharmaceutical and medical device business analyst over 20 years of experience in business development, marketing, sales, public speaking, and strategic consulting. As an executive strategist, her clients range from start-ups to Fortune 500 leaders, including Allergan, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Thermo Fisher Scientific.

  • Evidence of Graphene Oxide in EUA ‘VACCINES‘ (Moderna and Pfizer)
  • Suspicious Patents under the guise of Health & ‘VACCINES”
    • Totalitarian Vaccine/Social Credit System Patents & Mandatory Apps
    • October, 2021 (Powerpoint Presentation)
  • Vaccine patents that detail the evil intent

Bioweapon Vaccine by Karen Kingston – November, 2021 (Video)

Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from TV & Computer monitors

Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors

The same inventor has 15 more patents, 10 of them to do with remotely-manipulating the nervous systems & memories:

Toxic mosquito aerial release system

US patent for a Toxic Mosquito Aerial release system, granted by The United States Patent and Trademark Office in 2014 includes a drone which can release infected mosquitoes. According to the patent documents, the drone is capable of delivering lethal and non-lethal toxins, including any agent that can be carried and administered by a mosquito.

“With the toxic mosquito aerial release system, large masses of people can be immunized or enemy troops can now be wiped out or rendered useless without having to risk or endanger our own troops. The toxic mosquito aerial release system is extremely low cost and can easily accomplish what a billion dollars in medical interventions and air strikes cannot do.”

Docetaxel | Long-Circulating Nanoparticles

Docetaxel | Long-Circulating Nanoparticles for Sustained Release of Therapeutic Agents

The CORRUPT World of Patents

  • Alexander Zaitchik on the problem with Patents in today’s corrupt world, who says that the IP laws are now ‘designed to keep medical knowledge out of the public’s hands‘: ‘Moderna’s Pledge Not to Enforce the Patents on Their COVID-19 Vaccine Is Worthless(61)
  • Letter from Big Pharma to Biden to Oppose the TRIPS IP waiver – March 5, 2021 (62)
  • Biotechnology Innovation Organization’s submission to the Office of the US Trade Representative arguing against sharing vaccine patents or the technological know-how on what’s needed to manufacture them, stating it will place “American jobs and the workers who rely on them at risk, and impede scientific advances from reaching society.” (If this was a real “antidote” to a real threat – I might take offense to it being “all about the money” and not about “saving lives”) (63)
  • The Intellectual Property Owners Association, funded and led by Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson (!!!!!), filed a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative for Innovation & Intellectual Property pretty much attacking all countries (including a few pages on Australia) on how their laws get in their way of their profits, and having a big whinge about enforceable IP rights. Good lord, reading this document, after 2 years of researching and knowing what has transpired – it’s extremely disturbing the amount of B.S. in this letter, and just how corrupt this world has become. Although I’m sure they feel perfectly entitled.
  • A 63-page document containing Q&A responses from Human Rights Watch to Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson – and their slick marketing-focused responses. (64)
  • Sums it up: Brook Baker, a Northeastern University law professor and expert on intellectual property. “Pharma’s response to the pandemic is: ‘Our system is perfect. All the monopoly rights we have need to be preserved and extended, and anyone who’s not giving us what we want should be condemned by the U.S. government.’

References[+]

Penny (PennyButler.com)
Penny (PennyButler.com)

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.