The UGLY truth about the Covid 19 lockdowns [PANDA 2021] (Part One)
Do you have a fave video that you wish people could’ve seen in 2021 before the world followed the pied piper? For me, even though some of the information and knowledge is different now one year later (since exploring beyond my “known” belief-system through this whole mess), I wish I had of found this and been able to send it out instead of overwhelming people with documents, studies, confusing literature, and wordy-letters trying to help people see beyond the propaganda.
Maybe something like this can still reach those who are still wearing masks? Those not ready to take the next leap of what we are facing, but to at least understand what we knew back in 2021?
Nick Hudson, the co-founder of Panda, an investor and private equity specialist:
Thank you, Alec, and I really applaud you for taking that approach to journalism. It’s uncomfortably rare in the whole world at the moment and that is just a terrible state of affairs.
Panda started off as a conversation ready group of four friends, professionals, economists, a doctor, a lawyer and a little actuary. What we shared was an observation that the data and the facts, the reality of coronavirus was far, far away from what the media and public health institutions were presenting to the world, and we saw in that problem the seeds of a great tragedy.
After some months we realized that our South African efforts needed to internationalize. This was not a local story and it was not only about the science. Our advisory board now includes some of the leading lights in infectious diseases and epidemiology, Nobel laureate, and the working team of Panda now spans the globe and includes a great many scientists, most of whom have to be members of Panda in a cryptic fashion. That’s how bad the censorship in this world has become.
- PANDA’s scientific advisory board includes some of the most renowned names in infectious diseases and epidemiology, such as:
- Dr Scott W. Atlas (Health policy scholar, physician, Hoover Institution, Stanford),
- Dr Sucharit Bhakdi (Immunologist),
- Dr Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford Epidemiologist),
- Dr Sunetra Gupta (Infectious Disease Epidemiologist),
- Senator Dr Scott Jensen (MD),
- Prof Dr Martin Kulldorff (Biostatistician, Harvard Epidemiologist, FDA Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee),
- Prof Michael Levitt (Biophysicist),
- Paul E Peterson (Professor of Government and Director of the Program on Education Policy and Governance at Harvard University and a senior fellow at Stanford),
- Prof Ellen Townsend (Professor of Psychology),
- Dr Michael Yeadon (former Pfizer – Respiratory speciality),
- and many others.
We have believed from the get-go that it was wrong on a number of levels to close society down, and that it has always been time to reopen society, and we also believe that the truth only prevails if plans are taken to bring it to light. Our world is gripped by fear and that fear is very much the product of a false narrative.
Case Fatality Rate
This is ground zero for the Malachi of COVID. This statement, the greatest misrepresentation of all time, two sentences which by themselves are true:
It’s true that the case fatality rate for COVID at this time was about 3.4% and it’s also true that the flu generally kills far fewer than 1%. In fact, most people would say 0.1% of those ‘infected’ (not of the cases), the sick people who arrive at hospital, but by conflating these two separate points (CFR and IFR), Tedros was effectively lying.
This man (Prof. John Ioannidis), one of the greatest infectious diseases specialist in the world, picked it up a few days later. He said that this statistic causes horror and it is meaningless, and he’s right. Five months later, the World Health Organisation had no option but to publish his paper which demonstrated the extent to which he was right, showing that the infection fatality rate for coronavirus was not 3.4% but 0.23% and more impressively that for people under the age of 70, it was a mere 0.05% which is to say negligible.
People are also astonished, because the media has suppressed this fact, that in March the first quarter of last year, none other than Anthony Fauci said that “the consequences of COVID may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza”. (01)
He was right at the time and has been right ever since but for reasons that are something of a mystery, he’s been wrong in terms of what he said ever since.
The other effect that this flat mortality rate hides, is this very impressive statistic, that there’s a 3 order of magnitude difference between the infection fatality rate for young people and that for the elderly.
Pre-existing immunity, and the asymptomatic lie
The wheel of published science turns very slowly and it’s caught up. There are now dozens of papers demonstrating the mechanisms and the detail and the extent of this fact that there is significant pre-existing immunity from exposure to past viruses, and that brings me to the second element that enables this doctrine of everybody being a danger, and that is the asymptomatic driver thesis. It rests on very shaky grounds.
I was absolutely aghast to find out the poor quality of the science, underpinning this idea. One of the seminal papers involved one woman who reputedly infected 16 of her colleagues while asymptomatic, but a tiny little bit of investigation pulled out the reality that she was being treated for flu-like symptoms, and with that evaporates a substantial underpinning of the whole asymptomatic transmission story.
We were quite pleased on the 8th of June when the World Health Organization acknowledged this. Dr Maria Van Kerkhove again gets up on stage and says “the data show that asymptomatic transmission of coronavirus is very rare” – only to be deflated the next day when she was forced back on stage to walk back her statement saying that “there’s still much we don’t know”, and “our models show us that…” and so on, and so on. It’s utter nonsense.
Again Fauci knew this in the first quarter. He told the world that “in the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks,” and again the literature catches up and we see that in the real-world data asymptomatic transmission is not a driver. (05)
What isn’t a lie and what is very clear in the data is that lockdown scores a great deal of harm.
We have infant mortality, we have creeping poverty, we have starvation, joblessness, they’ve been gut-wrenching, denials of service, failures to diagnose or even treat diseases which are far more impactful than coronavirus.
And we are now dealing with a horrible specter, especially amongst the youth of psychological disorders, with the incidence of self-harm and suicidal ideation expanding to levels that have never been seen before.
One and a half billion children had their educations effectively terminated, or at least severely disrupted, and that is even true for the few children of the wealthy who were able to attend classes online.
And perhaps the hardest thing for me to swallow about all of this is in undergraduate epidemiology. It is a well-known finding that when you are confronted with a disease with sharp age graduation, as you are with coronavirus, measures to generally suppress the spread of the disease have the effect reliably of shifting the disease burden onto the vulnerable who we should be protecting. They worsen or expect it to worsen and do worsen coronavirus mortality.
Tom Jefferson, the famous epidemiologist is correct. There’s sometimes you get the feeling that a whole industry is waiting for a pandemic to occur. The reason you get that feeling is there is one. Big Pharma.
I love this woke Pope meme. It’s made up, okay? This is not fact, but it does communicate an important point that vaccines are being sold as a ticket to freedom by people who stand to make countless billions out of them.
We get to the extreme very quickly with GAVI the conflicted vaccine alliance telling us that “nobody is safe unless everybody is safe“. How convenient! That we now have a logic that tells us that we need to vaccinate 7.8 billion people for a disease that has a mean survival rate of 99.95% for people under the age of 70. The profiteering here is naked. It is transparent, and so we have these sad situations of teenagers who are really not susceptible lining up to get vaccinated in a desperation to get their freedoms back. They’re stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Fear, Fear, Fear, Fear, Fear
We have the looming vaccine passport, loss of personal liberties on an unprecedented level and so on, and fear, fear, fear, fear, fear, fear of reinfection, fear of long COVID, fear of resurgence and waves and mutations and variants, and it just is continuous and unnecessary, and it’s putting us into a very Orwellian dystopia with pictures that have never been seen in living memory in liberal democracies. Pictures of violence, desperation and absurdity, absolute absurdity.
If you are not seeing, at the moment, that the very underpinnings of our civilization are under threat here, then I beg you to consider. We have a choice, we’re up, we’ve been pushed up against the precipice. Are we going to be pushed off? Or are we going to push back? I’d like you to go and read the Great Barrington Declaration which advocates pretty much for what the guidelines said, what we knew before the world went mad that we should pursue a doctrine of focused protection and get on with our lives.
Mandela was right, courage is not the absence of fear, it’s okay to have been scared by this virus, courage is the triumph over fear and we all need to strive to accomplish it. It’s a hell of a task because this is true that men think in herds and go mad in herds but they only recover their senses one by one. It’s a tough task ahead.
In order to go back to normal we need to mount an unprecedented awareness campaign to kill this harmful narrative, this deadly narrative of fear and malarkey, and then after that, we have to do some more work. It’s not simply get rid of this fear, we need to look very carefully at what failed, and what safeguards do we need to prevent this kind of situation from ever happening again. Thank you.
|01||Fauci AS, Lane HC, Redfield RR. Covid-19 – Navigating the Uncharted. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1268-1269. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2002387. Epub 2020 Feb 28. PMID: 32109011; PMCID: PMC7121221. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387|
|02||12 Feb 2020 – Tedros – Twitter “We now have a name for the disease caused by the novel coronavirus: COVID-19. Having a name matters to prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing. #COVID19” https://twitter.com/DrTedros/status/1227297754499764230|
|03||History of coronavirus naming during the three zoonotic outbreaks in relation to virus taxonomy and diseases caused by Coronaviruses https://www.researchgate.net/figure/History-of-coronavirus-naming-during-the-three-zoonotic-outbreaks-in-relation-to-virus_fig1_365573993|
|04||Bloomberg – WHO Says Covid-19 Asymptomatic Transmission Is ‘Very Rare’ Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, Technical Lead COVID-19, WHO Health Emergencies Programme https://youtu.be/NQTBlbx1Xjs|
|05||Dr. Fauci Says Asymptomatic Transmission Doesn’t Drive Epidemics https://youtu.be/X1orSO094uY|
|06||US Secretary of Health Holds Press Conference On Response To Wuhan Coronavirus | TIME https://www.youtube.com/live/4zGZHUaREsQ?feature=share&t=2352 (Timestamp: 39:10 | Clip-Mirror: https://youtu.be/X1orSO094uY|
|07||14 Mar 2020 – W5: Meet the Canadian leading the fight against COVID-19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lViaVZ_s8MY&t=754s (Timestamp: 12:34)|
|08||20 Feb 2015 – Dr. David Nabarro and Dr. Bruce Aylward on Ebola response – Press – (Found this while looking for more on Bruce – he was leading the Ebola scam too!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baAdq8slO68&t=94s (Timestamp: 0:45)|
|09||Bendavid E, Oh C, Bhattacharya J, Ioannidis JPA. Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Apr;51(4):e13484. doi: 10.1111/eci.13484. Epub 2021 Feb 1. PMID: 33400268; PMCID: PMC7883103. Download PDF|
|10||Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19 Interim guidance 5 June 2020 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak (archived)|
|11||Hendrix MJ, Walde C, Findley K, Trotman R. Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists After Exposure at a Hair Salon with a Universal Face Covering Policy – Springfield, Missouri, May 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jul 17;69(28):930-932. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6928e2. PMID: 32673300. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6928e2.htm|
|12||Xiao J, Shiu E, Gao H, Wong JY, Fong MW, Ryu S, et al. Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5):967-975. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2605.190994 https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article|
|13||Protocol for Reopening Society https://pandata.org/in-focus/protocol-for-reopening-society/|