Journey

• Journalists concerned with Government-led Covid narratives that have dominated the mainstream media across the world can still make a stand – you are NOT alone.
  
• Holding the Line: Journalists Against Covid Censorship aims to promote best practice and offer solutions to ensure balanced debate returns to the media industry.
  
• Covid deaths, vaccine harm, and PCR and other Covid tests have NOT been put under sustained scrutiny in the media – HTL aims to empower journalists to do this.
  
• Freelancers have been blacklisted by media outlets for seeking to write counter-narrative stories and reporters have been ridiculed/warned by managers for offering an alternative view.
  
• Journalists should be able to question the established narrative without fear of prejudice and hostility from colleagues/managers and the public.

An early example is the reporting of so-called Covid deaths.

As most people now know, these are not necessarily Covid deaths at all but deaths of people who tested positive in the previous 28 days mostly using a PCR test that doctors, scientists and even the World Health Organisation say produces false positives.

Law courts in Portugal and Austria have already declared PCR tests unreliable yet they were the basis of worldwide lockdowns and crackdowns on personal freedom. ⁽¹¹⁾

Forced to provide verified mortality data, a Portuguese court ruled that of 17,000 alleged ‘covid deaths’ between January 2020 and April 2021, only 152 were actually from Covid. ⁽¹²⁾

The other 16,848 embraced a whole range of death causes including accidents.

The spokesperson stressed that the group’s aims did not include “having a go” at fellow journalists.

He said: “Many journalists are being misled like everyone else and even those that are aware often find their hands tied by publishers and editors who are following the official agenda.

“We know freelancers who have been blacklisted by media outlets for seeking to write balanced stories that challenge Covid narratives that have been established in the mainstream media through constant repetition rather than being built on scientific data.

“Others have been warned that they could be in breach of contract if they cross the line.

“One of our members received an official warning from her newspaper.

“Another was taken off air by his radio station for being too ‘controversial’.

“A third has been branded as a ‘conspiracy theorist’ for putting forward a story that questioned the safety of the Covid injections.”

The spokesperson said there was a popular myth that anything that failed to tie in with the governmental narrative was social media “disinformation” from so-called anti-vaxxers.

“That is plain wrong,” he said.

“Hundreds of doctors, virologists, bacteriologists and other scientists are seeing their posts removed from the internet on a daily basis simply because their studies and views disagree with the official narrative.

“Many are leaders in their fields – people like Dr Robert Malone, celebrated as the inventor of the mRNA technology now being used in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs.”

In a podcast interview in June 2021, Malone warned that the spike protein in the jabs was not behaving as expected.

Instead of staying near the injection site, it was biologically active and leading to blood clots, bleeding disorders, heart problems and neurological damage as well as accumulating in women’s ovaries.

Within two days the interview on Bret Weinstein’s podcast was pulled by YouTube and Weinstein given a warning.

Malone’s lauded contribution to the development of the mRNA vaccine was then excised from the Wikipedia entry.

Watch group spokesperson Sonia Elijah’s interview Dr Robert Malone here

More on Dr Robert Malone censorship

Two-part interview with Dr Robert Malone that the tech giants don’t want you to hear

The spokesperson said: “This is typical of what’s going on. We could provide numerous other examples.

“Governments claim to be led by science but in reality they are being led by Big Pharma and the so-called fact-checkers and Big Tech algorithms that censor on a grand scale.”