GMO Parasite Patent’s Review (I don’t see the evidence)

  • Updated:1 year ago
  • Reading Time:13Minutes
  • Post Words:3372Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

I’ve been trying to figure out how Dr. Ariyana Love and Dr. Robert Young came to the conclusion that the sequences in the patents they are highlighting are the same thing.

If you’re not aware of what I’m talking about:

They seem to be implying that they’ve discovered that SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 in all the mRNA vaccine patents are referring to the same substance, and I’m trying to figure out how they came to that conclusion.

So this is what this post is about. Trying to figure out if “SEQ ID NO: 1” and “SEQ ID NO: 2” is the same substance across all the patents they identified.

Anyone looking at their articles and threads would be asking the same question one would assume?

  1. If you can’t prove that SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 is the same substance/computer code/parasite/chemical/parasitic mRNA vectors, or the same in any way, then this research is fundamentally flawed, misleading, or too confusing to understand.
  2. But if it “can” be proven that they are the same substance, then this is absolutely critical for all of us to know and gives us an idea on how we can treat those who have been injured by the jabs.

It’s pretty important that we figure out if they have found something of urgent critical importance for saving humanity, or if they have accidently “dot-connected” something that is unrelated.

Why? Because if what they are saying can be proven, then the jabs:

  • contain deadly protozoan parasite pathogens (Toxoplasma Gondii, Eimeria, Plasmodium, Theileria)
  • stops embryonic development and prevents embryo implantation
    • (“baby-killers“: forced birth control and better understanding of birth-rate decline and miscarriage/stillbirth epidemic since the jab roll-out)

As I go through this process of figuring out if they have found a connection or are seeing something that isn’t connected, I have to note that the patents they mentioned are still suspicious anyway, i.e. even if they don’t turn out to be the same substance, these patents have got my attention purely because of the names and players behind the patents, as you’ll soon see…


They say that SEQ ID NO: 1 is described in the patent titled “VACCINE#20130216569 owned by the Pirbright Institute (which, if you’ve been following my research, you know Pirbright is connected to and could even be the British “new world order” headquarters; literally the people who have enslaved humanity for over a hundred years, so yes, this patent has my attention, regardless of where this leads).

Anytime I see the word “Vaccine” or “Virus”, my mind transforms it to “bioweapon/toxin.” I can’t help it. You’ve seen the research. It becomes interchangeable the deeper you delve.

Screenshots of the patent:

The code of “SEQ ID No. 1”

The first aspect of the invention relates to a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of Immune Mapped Protein-1 (IMP-1) shown as SEQ ID No. 1 below, or a homologue or fragment thereof.


The polypeptide shown as SEQ ID No. 1 is derivable from the Eimeria maxima Weybridge (W) strain.


They say that SEQ ID NO: 2 is described in the patent titled “Method of reducing or inhibiting ObR signaling using a leptin antagonist consisting of SEQ id No: 2#7612043 owned by Boston Biomedical Research Institute and the United States Government. This patent prevents embryo implantation in mammals. Embryo implantation is reached between 5 and 6 days after fertilization. It stops embryonic development within the first few days of conception. (Thereby preventing births).

Yeah, we should probably be concerned that the psychopaths in the US Government have rights over a patent that can inhibit human birth control.

Screenshots of the patent:

The code (& notes) of “SEQ ID No. 2”

Neither the patent website, nor the paper that describes it’s function, shares the actual SEQ ID No. 2 code. The paper is behind an institutional paywall so I can’t access beyond the abstract. But when you download the PDF version of the patent, it lists the sequences on pages 29 and 30.

<213> ORGANISM: Artificial Sequence
<223> OTHER INFORMATION: Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide


<400> SEQUENCE: 1

Ile Gln Lys Val Gln Asp Asp Thr Lys Thr Leu Ile Lys Thr Ile Val

Thr Arg Ile Asn Asp Ile Ser His Thr Gln Ser Val Ser Ser Lys Gln


<400> SEQUENCE: 2

Ser Arg Asn Val Ile Gln Ile Ser Asn Asp Leu Glu Asn Leu Arg Asp

Leu Leu His Val Leu Ala Phe Ser Lys Ser


<400> SEQUENCE: 3

Val Ala Glu Val Leu Asn Arg Ser Asp Leu Ile Gln Arg Ile Ser Phe

Ser Leu Asp Leu Asn Asn Ser Lys Leu His

Thought-process at this point…

  1. Why did this patent list a Sequence 3 code (when nothing in the patent refers to a sequence 3)? (perhaps it’s described in the paywalled paper I can’t access or a related-child patent?)
  2. Concerning the government has rights on a patent that can inhibit human births.
  3. Patent refers to a Sequence 1, that doesn’t match the Sequence 1 of the first patent.

Ok moving on.

Pfizer SEQ 1 & 2

So now we reach the point where we can start to check what they are claiming. The first one is they claim that the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine Patent #WO2021213945A1 contains both SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2.

So we need to compare the sequences listed in Pfizer’s patent to the above 2 sequences they are matching them up to.

Screenshots of the patent:

Ok, finally, several hours later… got it.


Description SEQUENCE S protein (amino acid)


First line:




No matter what I do, I cannot “copy” the code to Pfizer’s SEQ 2 from their document.
(So hopefully we just need “line 1” to prove anything):


So it doesn’t look like Pfizer’s SEQ 1 or SEQ 2 match the patents that they mentioned.

SEQ 1 “VACCINE” vs SEQ 1 “Pfizer”



SEQ 1 “Pfizer”


SEQ 2 “ObR signaling…” (“Baby Killer” patent) vs SEQ 2 “Pfizer”

SEQ 2 “ObR signaling…” (“Baby Killer” patent)

Ser Arg Asn Val Ile Gln Ile Ser Asn Asp Leu Glu Asn Leu Arg Asp

Leu Leu His Val Leu Ala Phe Ser Lys Ser

SEQ 2 “Pfizer”


Thoughts at this point…

  1. I wonder if they thought “SEQ 1” & “SEQ 2” were references to particular genbank entries?
  2. They still have found some dodgy looking patents that’s for sure.
    • The first one being closely-tied to the “Ruling Elite”
    • and the second one being a birth control patent the US government will profit from.
  3. I’m wondering if I’ve missed what they are really pointing out?
    • Are they looking in a different place than I am? Going on this video, I don’t think I’m doing it wrong, I think that Dr Love thinks that SEQ 1 and SEQ 2 is referring to a specific entry somewhere that all patents can refer to; but each patent has a different SEQ 1 and different SEQ 2 that is unique to that patent (and maybe connecting patents will refer to each other, but in this case, they don’t seem to be referring to the same sequence).
  4. In any case, I need their explanation if I’m wrong or misunderstood their evidence, I need to understand why they think the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines contain the codes of the “Vaccine/Parasites” and “Birth Control/Baby-Killer” patents?
    • Do I need to look beyond the Pfizer one and into the other patents to find a match?
  5. I’m not doubting it’s “the killing fields” out there, I’m just unable to figure out why they think they are the same sequence, I’m unable to make the connection between the patents in the way they laid it out.
    • Perhaps there’s another connection?
      • Such as what Karen Kingston found in the Moderna patents (a “master patent” that referenced a lot of “child patents” that connects them all).
        • But I haven’t found that in this case and I’m still confused why they are connecting these patents with each other, and until I can find the connection, I cannot make sense of the evidence they are presenting.
    • Anyone help a girl out? (my telegram chat group)
      • I’ve messaged Dr Love on her Telegram channel and replied to a few of the posts to other commenters to see if I can get some clarity before I started this post trying to figure it out on my own.
        • Hopefully she’ll reply and give me the bits I’m missing and I can share this post with her to show how confused I am and why I don’t understand their research until I can “see what they are seeing”
  6. Note, this is not to deny what Dr Robert Young actually found in the blood.

Pirbright – The Pirbright Institute has close affiliations with vaccine pharmaceuticals including British Merial (originally a joint venture between drug companies U.S. Merck and French Sanofi-Aventis), German Boehringer Ingelheim, British Wellcome Trust, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation are the two largest investors in pharma research on the planet and heavily fund The Pirbright Institute. Also connected to Henry (Rothschild) de Worms (Yep – Rothschild AND Pilgrims). Pirbright has a vaccine manufacturing plant in Wuhan, and patented “Coronavirus” in 2018.

Related posts tagged: “Dr Robert Young” “Pirbright” “Bioweapon” “Patents


Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.