GMO Parasite Patent’s Review (I don’t see the evidence)

on December 30, 2022 IN C19 RANTS

Updated:1 year ago
Reading Time:13Minutes
Post Words:3372Words

I’ve been trying to figure out how Dr. Ariyana Love and Dr. Robert Young came to the conclusion that the sequences in the patents they are highlighting are the same thing.

If you’re not aware of what I’m talking about:

Dr Robert Young’s article: MEGA BOMBS! GMO Parasites Are The mRNA Vector!
- Video Explainer: MEGA BOMBS! Deadly GMO Parasites are the mRNA Vectors: Patent Review with Dr. Young & Dr. Love
Dr. Ariyana Love’s article: MEGA BOMBS! GMO Parasites Are The mRNA Vectors!
- Twitter Thread: twitter.com/drariyanalovely/status/1581486353409536003
- Telegram Thread: https://t.me/DrAriyanaLove/22137

They seem to be implying that they’ve discovered that SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 in all the mRNA vaccine patents are referring to the same substance, and I’m trying to figure out how they came to that conclusion.

So this is what this post is about. Trying to figure out if “SEQ ID NO: 1” and “SEQ ID NO: 2” is the same substance across all the patents they identified.

Anyone looking at their articles and threads would be asking the same question one would assume?

If you can’t prove that SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2 is the same substance/computer code/parasite/chemical/parasitic mRNA vectors, or the same in any way, then this research is fundamentally flawed, misleading, or too confusing to understand.
But if it “can” be proven that they are the same substance, then this is absolutely critical for all of us to know and gives us an idea on how we can treat those who have been injured by the jabs.

It’s pretty important that we figure out if they have found something of urgent critical importance for saving humanity, or if they have accidently “dot-connected” something that is unrelated.

Why? Because if what they are saying can be proven, then the jabs:

contain deadly protozoan parasite pathogens (Toxoplasma Gondii, Eimeria, Plasmodium, Theileria)
- (thereby we’d be able to know how to treat and more about illnesses, particularly as one of them causes myocarditis (Chagas’), another causes you to “fall in love with someone from the same sex…“ (a kid-friendly version of what it actually does in the ‘love’ department), and more) ^{⁽⁰¹⁾ Bern C, Kjos S, Yabsley MJ, Montgomery SP. Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas’ Disease in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Oct;24(4):655-81. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00005-11. PMID: 21976603; PMCID: PMC3194829. ⁽⁰²⁾ Jaroslav Flegr (2017) Does Toxoplasma infection increase sexual masochism and submissiveness? Yes and no, Communicative & Integrative Biology, 10:5-6, DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2017.1303590 ⁽⁰³⁾ Is the brain parasite Toxoplasma manipulating your behavior, or is your immune system to blame? – 2019 https://theconversation.com/is-the-brain-parasite-toxoplasma-manipulating-your-behavior-or-is-your-immune-system-to-blame-116718 ⁽⁰⁴⁾Pedersen, M.G., Mortensen, P.B., Norgaard-Pedersen, B. & Postolache, T.T. Toxoplasma gondii Infection and Self-directed Violence in Mothers, Archives of General Psychiatry, DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.668 … Click for full citation ⁽⁰⁵⁾ Guided by Parasites: Toxoplasma Modified Humans – 20 min Lecture http://tobiastenney.com/2010/06/toxoplasma/}
stops embryonic development and prevents embryo implantation
- (“baby-killers“: forced birth control and better understanding of birth-rate decline and miscarriage/stillbirth epidemic since the jab roll-out)

As I go through this process of figuring out if they have found a connection or are seeing something that isn’t connected, I have to note that the patents they mentioned are still suspicious anyway, i.e. even if they don’t turn out to be the same substance, these patents have got my attention purely because of the names and players behind the patents, as you’ll soon see…

SEQ ID NO: 1

They say that SEQ ID NO: 1 is described in the patent titled “VACCINE” #20130216569 owned by the Pirbright Institute (which, if you’ve been following my research, you know Pirbright is connected to and could even be the British “new world order” headquarters; literally the people who have enslaved humanity for over a hundred years, so yes, this patent has my attention, regardless of where this leads).

Anytime I see the word “Vaccine” or “Virus”, my mind transforms it to “bioweapon/toxin.” I can’t help it. You’ve seen the research. It becomes interchangeable the deeper you delve.

Screenshots of the patent:

The code of “SEQ ID No. 1”

The first aspect of the invention relates to a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of Immune Mapped Protein-1 (IMP-1) shown as SEQ ID No. 1 below, or a homologue or fragment thereof.

SEQ ID No. 1: IMP-1 E. maxima Weybridge strain translated cDNA MGAACGKSQRAAAAVEPPLSTAEKAEAAAVAAAEHSQKAEEAAEVAAAC ATKASAEAAVLTGVEPGAEPAAEAEEAPKQNEIEEQQTTTTPAQTHATEEQ PAAPPVVPLSDADAQVLAAAEAAKQEAASSNMPRAYLFYACELNEGSLM MQWTTTQITEEDMHAKNLILLASFFPAKHKTVSKSKLTQNGGITYFLQEMK YKWEVWSKVQRQAYYQGWIKFVKAADEMEASFTLHHFAAPAPPAKLFLL HTGPIENKVLPAKEEEPFNVSVFGLAAVTPPSPPYKPGANITPKRFGEIATGA GGAYMQLSRRGGDAAFDEKEVQKWLAADGLQMKKGEGITLDAAGGYER RRSEKKGGDAAAATAAVEAEPTKVSQD

The polypeptide shown as SEQ ID No. 1 is derivable from the Eimeria maxima Weybridge (W) strain.

SEQ ID NO: 2

They say that SEQ ID NO: 2 is described in the patent titled “Method of reducing or inhibiting ObR signaling using a leptin antagonist consisting of SEQ id No: 2” #7612043 owned by Boston Biomedical Research Institute and the United States Government. This patent prevents embryo implantation in mammals. Embryo implantation is reached between 5 and 6 days after fertilization. It stops embryonic development within the first few days of conception. (Thereby preventing births).

Yeah, we should probably be concerned that the psychopaths in the US Government have rights over a patent that can inhibit human birth control.

Screenshots of the patent:

The code (& notes) of “SEQ ID No. 2”

Neither the patent website, nor the paper that describes it’s function, shares the actual SEQ ID No. 2 code. The paper is behind an institutional paywall so I can’t access beyond the abstract. But when you download the PDF version of the patent, it lists the sequences on pages 29 and 30.

<213> ORGANISM: Artificial Sequence
<223> OTHER INFORMATION: Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide

SEQ ID NO 1

<400> SEQUENCE: 1

Ile Gln Lys Val Gln Asp Asp Thr Lys Thr Leu Ile Lys Thr Ile Val

Thr Arg Ile Asn Asp Ile Ser His Thr Gln Ser Val Ser Ser Lys Gln

SEQ ID NO 2


<400> SEQUENCE: 2

Ser Arg Asn Val Ile Gln Ile Ser Asn Asp Leu Glu Asn Leu Arg Asp

Leu Leu His Val Leu Ala Phe Ser Lys Ser

SEQ ID NO 3


<400> SEQUENCE: 3

Val Ala Glu Val Leu Asn Arg Ser Asp Leu Ile Gln Arg Ile Ser Phe

Ser Leu Asp Leu Asn Asn Ser Lys Leu His

Notes taken whilst scrolling through the patent:

This invention was made in part with Government support under a CONRAD/CICCR/USAID grant CIG-02-87 to R. R. Gonzalez. The government has certain rights in the invention.

1. A method for reducing or inhibiting ObR signaling in a leptin-responsive cell, the method comprising administering to a mammal a therapeutically effective amount of a peptide consisting of SEQ ID NO.: 2.

In the present invention, contact of the leptin-responsive cell with a peptide comprising a leptin sequence may be in vitro or in vivo. The cell may be a human or rabbit cell, and may further be an endometrial or other leptin-responsive cell.

FIG. 4A-D show leptin and IL-1 induced LIF-R expression by human endometrial cells are partially blocked by IL-1R tI inhibitors.

FIG. 11 illustrates the impairment of mouse embryo implantation by intra-uterine injection of OB-R inhibitors.

More specifically, the methods of the present invention may be used to study the roles of Ob-R signaling in reproduction, inflammation, proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. The methods of the present invention may be used to study and/or develop therapeutics for disease states relating to leptin misregulation, including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, acquired immune disease, cancer (including endometrial cancer), endocrine disorders of the adrenal cortex and pituitary glands, preeclampsia, endometriosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome, fertility, and obesity. The methods disclosed herein are not intended to be limited only for use with cells in culture.

The mammal to which the peptide is administered in the present invention may be any mammal which has genes that encode leptin and leptin receptor molecules or equivalents. […] Examples of mammals with known conserved leptin sequences include humans, mice, and rabbits.

Leptin Induced Increase in Leukemia Inhibitory Factor and its Receptor by Human Endometrium is Partially Mediated by Interleukin 1 Receptor Signaling

Every mention of a SEQ ID:

It is a requirement that the identified peptide possess a high binding affinity for Ob-R and be an effective antagonist of Ob-R. In a preferred embodiment, an identified leptin region comprises any of residues 3-34 (LPA-1; SEQ ID NO:1) of the leptin sequence (helix I) or any of residues 70-95 (LPA-2; SEQ ID NO:2) of the leptin sequence (helix III).
In one embodiment, the peptide comprises residues 3-34 (LPA-1; SEQ ID NO:1) of the leptin sequence (helix I) or a non-identical equivalent.
In another embodiment, the peptide comprises residues 70-95 (LPA-2; SEQ ID NO:2) of the leptin sequence (helix III) or a non-identical equivalent.
A non-identical equivalent is a peptide comprising a sequence substantially similar to either SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:2, wherein the non-identical equivalent retains the functional properties of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:2.

OB-R Inhibitors

LPA-2 and a scrambled version of this peptide (LPA-2Sc, negative control) were synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis and purified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described elsewhere Gonzalez and Leavis, Endocrine 21:185-195 (2003). ^{⁽⁰⁶⁾Gonzalez RR, Leavis PC. A peptide derived from the human leptin molecule is a potent inhibitor of the leptin receptor function in rabbit endometrial cells. Endocrine. 2003 Jul;21(2):185-95. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:21:2:185. PMID: 12897384. … Click for full citation}
LPA-1 (IQKVQDDTKTLIKTIVTRINDISHTQSVSSKQ (MW: 3626.1454); SEQ ID NO:1) and a scrambled version of this peptide (LPA-1Sc, negative control) were similarly synthesized.

Click to expand notes if interested

Show less

Thought-process at this point…

Why did this patent list a Sequence 3 code (when nothing in the patent refers to a sequence 3)? (perhaps it’s described in the paywalled paper I can’t access or a related-child patent?)
Concerning the government has rights on a patent that can inhibit human births.
Patent refers to a Sequence 1, that doesn’t match the Sequence 1 of the first patent.

Ok moving on.

Pfizer SEQ 1 & 2

So now we reach the point where we can start to check what they are claiming. The first one is they claim that the Pfizer Coronavirus Vaccine Patent #WO2021213945A1 contains both SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 2.

So we need to compare the sequences listed in Pfizer’s patent to the above 2 sequences they are matching them up to.

Screenshots of the patent:

Doing a search for “SEQ ID” in the Pfizer patent brings up over 1,119 results, so I’m not going to list it here for obvious reasons. The Pfizer patent is a massive file and most of the other “COVID vaccines” cite it in their references which I found interesting too.

To think that any of our health regularities or health professionals have any clue at all as to what these jabs do is further evidenced by looking at this patent. Not only to what they say they can do in their “marketing arm” but this patent is a crime scene for how deliberately confusing it is. No bloody chance that our regulators know jack-shit about what they are injecting into people.

The patent itself is 931 pages.

Like the above patent, you have to download the PDF to get the sequences, but the pdf version of the patent is not searchable because it’s “embedded images”, so you have to first convert it into text to make it searchable. Nightmare.

First I tried extracted the pages I wanted to convert into separate pages so that I don’t have to convert the huge document (because for this particular research-focus, I just want to see if their Sequence 1 & 2 match to what Dr. Love & Dr. Young is reporting. If you’re interested, I use PDF 24 Toolbox, a free tool, which has been a life-saver during the past few years for dealing with PDFs. Unfortunately that didn’t work.

Then I tried running it through an OCR, but because I couldn’t extract the pages, it was going to take 7hrs lol. I’ll allow it to try but if it doesn’t work, I’ve wasted 7 hours, so I will try it another way at the same time. So I tried converted the whole document to text to make it searchable – no luck “blank”. Seriously I’ve never had this problem with any other PDF throughout the “pandemic”. There is something “wrong” with the Pfizer PDF patent. Next I tried converting it to html. Blank again. Next, I used the “Split PDF” tool to split it into 10 separate files. The split worked but even trying to just convert one of these pages to text, html or anything, it was “blank again”. This is insane. But now that I have smaller files, I can try some online PDF converters.

First I tried converting PDF to HTML using convertio (just page 1 to test). Believe it or not, it converted, but the end result was a HTML file that was images – unsearchable. But there are plenty of online tools to convert images to text, but I still hadn’t figured out which pages I wanted to convert (I wanted Pages 1, 133-140, 213-220). I decided to see if I could convert the entire document from PDF to HTML using cloud convert. And while that was processing (looks like it will take forever), I thought I’d also try a couple of PDF to TEXT and have them all converting at once. I tried PDF2go and i2PDF. That turned out to be the best. The second one did OCR on the document and converted it into a “searchable PDF”. So now I know there is at least one website that might be able to do the whole document. i2PDF – PDF OCR. I know it’s going to take a while but the test file worked so well, that I think I’ll take my chances on this converting the entire Pfizer PDF into a searchable PDF that we can all find useful. Sigh. It timed-out because the file was too big.

Bloody hell… and I don’t even get paid for this lol. I bet you those guys getting paid millions a year “for our health” hasn’t spent the thousands upon thousands of hours we have, read the thousands among thousands of documents we have, or gone through anything close to any of things we’ve done “FOR FREE” to try uncover the truth over the past 4 years. The sun was shining today. I missed it because I wanted to get to the bottom of this. People in these high-level health positions should be the ones doing this, not single people living below poverty in their lounge rooms.

Click to expand rant about how painful the Pfizer PDF is to extract info

Show less

Ok, finally, several hours later… got it.

TABLE 1: DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCES

Description SEQUENCE S protein (amino acid)

SEQ ID NO 1

First line:

FVFLVLLPLVSSQCVNLTTRTQLPPAYTNSFTRGVYYPDKVFRSSVLHSTQDLFLPFFSNVTWFHAIHVSGTNGTKRFDNPVLPFNDGVYFASTEK


MFVFLVLLPLVSSQCVNLTTRTQLPPAYTNSFTRGVYYPDKVFRSSVLHSTQDLFLPFFSNVTWFHAIHVSGTNGTKRFDNPVLPFNDGVYFASTEK
SNIIRGWIFGTTLDSKTQSLLIVNNATNVVIKVCEFQFCNDPFLGVYYHKNNKSWMESEFRVYSSANNCTFEYVSOQPFLMDLEGKQGNFKNLREFV
FKNIDGYFKIYSKHTPINLVRDLPQGFSALEPLVDLPIGINITRFQTLLALHRSYLTPGDSSSGWTAGAAAYYVGYLOPRTFLLKYNENGTITDAVDCAL
DPLSETKCTLKSFTVEKGIYQTSNFRVQOPTESIVRFPNITNLCPFGEVFNATRFASVYAWNRKRISNCVADYSVLYNSASFSTFKCYGVSPTKLNDLCF
TNVYADSFVIRGDEVROQIAPGOTGKIADYNYKLPDDFTGCVIAWNSNNLDSKVGGNYNYLYRLFRKSNLKPFERDISTEIYQAGSTPCNGVEGFNC
YFPLQSYGFOPTNGVGYOPYRVVVLSFELLHAPATVCGPKKSTNLVKNKCVNFNFNGLTGTGVLTESNKKFLPFQQFGRDIADTTDAVRDPQTLEIL
DITPCSFGGVSVITPGTNTSNQVAVLYQDVNCTEVPVAIHADQLTPTWRVYSTGSNVFQTRAGCLIGAEHVNNSYECDIPIGAGICASYQTQTNSP
RRARSVASQSIIAYTMSLGAENSVAYSNNSIAIPTNFTISVTTEILPVSMTKTSVDCTMYICGDSTECSNLLLQYGSFCTQLNRALTGIAVEQDKNTQE
VFAQVKQIYKTPPIKDFGGFNFSQILPDPSKPSKRSFIEDLLFNKVTLADAGFIKQYGDCLGDIAARDLICAQKFNGLTVLPPLLTDEMIAQYTSALLAG
TITSGWTFGAGAALQIPFAMQMAYRFNGIGVTQNVLYENQKLIANQFNSAIGKIQDSLSSTASALGKLQDVVNQNAQALNTLVKQLSSNFGAISS
VLNDILSRLDKVEAEVQIDRLITGRLQSLOTYVTQQLIRAAEIRASANLAATKMSECVLGQSKRVDFCGKGYHLMSFPQSAPHGVVFLHVTYVPAQE
KNFTTAPAICHDGKAHFPREGVFVSNGTHWFVTQRNEFYEPQIITTDNTFVSGNCDVVIGIVNNTVYDPLQPELDSFKEELDKYFKNHTSPDVDLGDI
SGINASVVNIQKEIDRLNEVAKNLNESLIDLQELGKYEQYIKWPWYIWLGFIAGLIAIVMVTIMLCCMTSCCSCLKGCCSCGSCCKFDEDDSEPVLKG

SEQ ID NO 2

No matter what I do, I cannot “copy” the code to Pfizer’s SEQ 2 from their document.
(So hopefully we just need “line 1” to prove anything):

auguuuguguuucuugugcugcugccucuugugucuucucagugugugdauullgacadacaagadcacagcugccaccagcuuauacaaauucuuuuaccagapeagug

So it doesn’t look like Pfizer’s SEQ 1 or SEQ 2 match the patents that they mentioned.

SEQ 1 “VACCINE” vs SEQ 1 “Pfizer”

SEQ 1 “VACCINE”

MGAACGKSQRAAAAVEPPLSTAEKAEAAAVAAAEHSQKAEEAAEVAAAC ATKASAEAAVLTGVEPGAEPAAEAEEAPKQNEIEEQQTTTTPAQ

SEQ 1 “Pfizer”

MFVFLVLLPLVSSQCVNLTTRTQLPPAYTNSFTRGVYYPDKVFRSSVLHSTQDLFLPFFSNVTWFHAIHVSGTNGTKRFDNPVLPFNDGVYFASTEK

SEQ 2 “ObR signaling…” (“Baby Killer” patent) vs SEQ 2 “Pfizer”

SEQ 2 “ObR signaling…” (“Baby Killer” patent)

Ser Arg Asn Val Ile Gln Ile Ser Asn Asp Leu Glu Asn Leu Arg Asp

Leu Leu His Val Leu Ala Phe Ser Lys Ser

SEQ 2 “Pfizer”

auguuuguguuucuugugcugcugccucuugugucuucucagugugugdauullgacadacaagadcacagcugccaccagcuuauacaaauucuuuuaccagapeagug

Thoughts at this point…

I wonder if they thought “SEQ 1” & “SEQ 2” were references to particular genbank entries?
They still have found some dodgy looking patents that’s for sure.
- The first one being closely-tied to the “Ruling Elite”
- and the second one being a birth control patent the US government will profit from.
I’m wondering if I’ve missed what they are really pointing out?
- Are they looking in a different place than I am? Going on this video, I don’t think I’m doing it wrong, I think that Dr Love thinks that SEQ 1 and SEQ 2 is referring to a specific entry somewhere that all patents can refer to; but each patent has a different SEQ 1 and different SEQ 2 that is unique to that patent (and maybe connecting patents will refer to each other, but in this case, they don’t seem to be referring to the same sequence).
In any case, I need their explanation if I’m wrong or misunderstood their evidence, I need to understand why they think the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines contain the codes of the “Vaccine/Parasites” and “Birth Control/Baby-Killer” patents?
- Do I need to look beyond the Pfizer one and into the other patents to find a match?
I’m not doubting it’s “the killing fields” out there, I’m just unable to figure out why they think they are the same sequence, I’m unable to make the connection between the patents in the way they laid it out.
- Perhaps there’s another connection?
  - Such as what Karen Kingston found in the Moderna patents (a “master patent” that referenced a lot of “child patents” that connects them all).
    - But I haven’t found that in this case and I’m still confused why they are connecting these patents with each other, and until I can find the connection, I cannot make sense of the evidence they are presenting.
- Anyone help a girl out? (my telegram chat group)
  - I’ve messaged Dr Love on her Telegram channel and replied to a few of the posts to other commenters to see if I can get some clarity before I started this post trying to figure it out on my own.
    - Hopefully she’ll reply and give me the bits I’m missing and I can share this post with her to show how confused I am and why I don’t understand their research until I can “see what they are seeing”
Note, this is not to deny what Dr Robert Young actually found in the blood.
- I’m just trying to get on the same page / understand how you connect what he found in the blood “to those particular patents”, how are you connecting the dots here? What is the connection to what he found to the blood, to these patents? I hope my question and where I’m confused is clear.
  - See also: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/mega-bombs-gmo-parasites-are-the-mrna-vector

Pirbright – The Pirbright Institute has close affiliations with vaccine pharmaceuticals including British Merial (originally a joint venture between drug companies U.S. Merck and French Sanofi-Aventis), German Boehringer Ingelheim, British Wellcome Trust, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation are the two largest investors in pharma research on the planet and heavily fund The Pirbright Institute. Also connected to Henry (Rothschild) de Worms (Yep – Rothschild AND Pilgrims). Pirbright has a vaccine manufacturing plant in Wuhan, and patented “Coronavirus” in 2018.

Related posts tagged: “Dr Robert Young” “Pirbright” “Bioweapon” “Patents“

Site Notifications/Chat:

Telegram Post Updates @JourneyToABetterLife (channel)
Telegram Chatroom @JourneyBetterLifeCHAT (say hi / share info)
Gettr Post Updates @chesaus (like fakebook)

Videos:

Aussies

Reveal PayID 323

Or Buy me a Coffee (PayPal)

References[+]

References
01	Bern C, Kjos S, Yabsley MJ, Montgomery SP. Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas’ Disease in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Oct;24(4):655-81. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00005-11. PMID: 21976603; PMCID: PMC3194829.
02	Jaroslav Flegr (2017) *Does Toxoplasma* infection increase sexual masochism and submissiveness? Yes and no**, Communicative & Integrative Biology, 10:5-6, DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2017.1303590
03	*Is the brain parasite Toxoplasma* manipulating your behavior, or is your immune system to blame?** – 2019 https://theconversation.com/is-the-brain-parasite-toxoplasma-manipulating-your-behavior-or-is-your-immune-system-to-blame-116718
04	Pedersen, M.G., Mortensen, P.B., Norgaard-Pedersen, B. & Postolache, T.T. Toxoplasma gondii Infection and Self-directed Violence in Mothers, Archives of General Psychiatry, DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.668 https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/toxoplasmas-dark-side-the-link-between-parasite-and-suicide/
05	Guided by Parasites: Toxoplasma Modified Humans – 20 min Lecture http://tobiastenney.com/2010/06/toxoplasma/
06	Gonzalez RR, Leavis PC. A peptide derived from the human leptin molecule is a potent inhibitor of the leptin receptor function in rabbit endometrial cells. Endocrine. 2003 Jul;21(2):185-95. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:21:2:185. PMID: 12897384. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1385/ENDO:21:2:185

Penny... on Health

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.

View my other posts