Fact-Checkers – New Mind-Control Weapon

on November 1, 2021 IN CONflict$

Updated:4 months ago
Reading Time:8Minutes
Post Words:2034Words

Third-Party “Independent” Fact-Checkers?

James (Jim) Smith:

Pfizer
- Director (2014-Current)
- Corporate Governance Committee (Current)
- Science and Technology Committee (Current)
Reuters
- President & CEO (2012- Mar 15 2020)
- Chairman & Board Member (Current)
World Economic Forum
- International Business Council (Current)
- Digital Economic and Society Initiative (Current)
- “Co-chairs the World Economic Forum’s Digital Economy and Society Initiative and is a member of the Forum’s International Business Council, as well as on the International Advisory Boards of British American Business and the Atlantic Council.“
See also: Wikipedia entry

Facebook Fact-Checkers

… funded by Johnson & Johnson

Fullscreen

Fact-checking the Fact Checkers

Fullscreen | Rumble (Mirror)

Questionable Conflict$ & Integrity

Integrity of “Reuters” (Pfizer & WEF’s right-arm)
- https://www.pfizer.com/people/leadership/board-of-directors/james_smith
Integrity of “Factcheck.org” (Facebook/Google’s vaccine fact-checker) funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation which holds over $1.8 billion of J&J vaccine stock.
- https://www.factcheck.org/our-funding/
- https://www.rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/financials.html (view 2019 financial statement)
Integrity of “Lead Stories” (Facebook/Google’s fact-checker)
- https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o95
Integrity of “Politifact” (funded by Google & Bill and Melinda Gates foundation)
- https://www.politifact.com/who-pays-for-politifact/
- Gates is invested in Pfizer, BioNTech, CureVac, Vir Biotechnology, GlaxoSmithKline, you name it, vaccines are his jam, and it’s endless the amount of fingers he has all over the entire COVID octopus, and he’s made a killing during the pandemic from every aspect of it. (Do I need to link to all his Conflict$ or is it just common knowledge that he’s pretty much funded COVID and all it’s policies and “solutions”?)
Google is owned by Alphabet, inc, which owns another 200 or so companies of which you’d know all of them and owns several vaccine companies including 12% ownership of “Vaccitech aka AstraZeneca“, which invested US27 million or so into a “universal flu vaccine” in 2018
- https://www.sciencealert.com/universal-flu-vaccine-funded-by-gv-clinical-trials
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03300362
(…which I find suspiciously coincidental to Fauci&Co’s forced “universal flu vaccine” they announced back in October 2019 that they discussed having a “novel avian flu or some kind of virus from China to force people to get the new mRNA vaccine“…
- https://www.c-span.org/video/?465845-1/universal-flu-vaccine
- (… I haven’t looked to see if there is a link between Vaccitech’s Universal Flu Vaccine and Fauci’s yet… but the “ingredients” of the Remote-Mind-Control studies look like the same ingredients as the Vaccitech clinical trial… )
But back to Alphabet aka Google aka Vaccitech: Google has lucrative partnerships with all the large vaccine manufacturers, including a $715 million partnership with GlaxoSmithKline, and own another vaccine company called “Verily“.

Start following the money… (things will make more sense)

Full-Fact registered as a Charity

Just because you say you’re an “impartial charity” – doesn’t make you impartial and doesn’t mean you’re one of the “good guys”. You know what a good guy is? I make nothing. Noone has “bought my soul” except trying to find the truth. If someone is giving you millions of dollars, do you have that same freedom to be transparent and honest?

FullFact

Registered Charity UK
Funding Page
Company (won’t allow me to view page)

Snopes

Facebook “Independent” Fact Checkers

‘THE TIES THAT BIND’ – REUTERS, PFIZER, FACEBOOK, BILL GATES & THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM ⁽⁰¹⁾ Stephen Andrew MP member for Mirani – Dec 14, 2021 – Facebook Post

Reuters, a $40 billion international multimedia company, has made itself the ‘holier than thou’ arbiter of all truth and falsehood in the world. Reuters has been one of the most active of the plague of ‘fact checkers’ now infesting the internet.

Most Reuters fact-checkers have no scientific, medical or public health qualifications. Yet even without qualifications, they are able to shut down highly qualified doctors and scientists, by deleting their communications, or by having their accounts suspended or deactivated.

Even worse – if a doctor or scientist has an article or post ‘fact-checked’ and labelled as “misinformation,” this can then be used to revoke their medical and/or research licence. Reuters boasts about its partnerships with Google, Facebook and Twitter, to “stop the spread of misinformation.

What the company NEVER mentions is the very close ties it ALSO enjoys with PFIZER, the World Economic Forum and the ‘The Trusted News Initiative’ – a propaganda arm of Western governments.

These ‘conflicts of interest’ only came to light when Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines, tweeted out that: “Jim Smith, who sits on Pfizer’s board, is also the current chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, and CEO and director of Reuters parent company, Thomson Reuters Corporation — a $1.53 billion publicly traded “provider of financial information … to businesses, governments and individuals worldwide.”

Smith was appointed to Pfizer’s board in 2014. Smith’s LinkedIn profile, also reveals he is a board member of the WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM and a member of WEF’s INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL.

Some of the other “partners” listed on WEF’s site includes AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Facebook, Amazon, Google, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as news groups like TIME, Bloomberg and the New York Times.

Another PFIZER BOARD MEMBER recently revealed to have serious ‘conflict of interest’ issues, is Dr Susan Desmond-Hellmann. Dr Desmond-Hellmann was appointed to the Pfizer Board in 2020. Before then, the good doctor was CEO of the BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION from 2014 to 2020. Dr Desmond-Hellmann also serves as the “Lead Independent Director’ of Facebook, another globalist company involved in actively censoring and ‘shadow-banning’ posts to do with certain ‘banned’ topics. To cap it all off, Dr Desmond-Hellmann ALSO serves as a Member on US President, Joe Biden’s, Council of Advisers on Science and Technology.

As Dr Malone tweeted out about all these hidden connections: “What we have here is this horizontal integration across pharma, big tech, big media, government and traditional media. It’s not just the Trusted News Initiative. It goes way beyond that”.

Fact-Checkers are the new “Digital Police”

Created to fight “misinformation” and “disinformation” in times of a pandemic – this should’ve been our trusted go-to’s for factual information, and it actually was the hardest thing to wrap my mind-around at the start, and I even bought into their lies many times before I spent months making sure that I had the “journal publications” to back me up and that I understood everything about what I was saying, and when I posted actual referenced truth and was still ‘flagged’ – I realized the enormity of what we are facing and started to really scrutinize and “fact-check” them right back to follow the trail and see what they were actually doing.

They fact-checked many articles that were true, giving the indication that it was ‘untrue’ – the way they do it is insidious. I wish I’d saved some of the ones that enraged me the most and there may still be remnants of the rants I had when trying to explain how they were doing it on my facebook account. In the ones on my mind, they “fact-checked” without actually “disputing” the fact – they actually use the wordsmithing technique that I mention often, this power of word-manipulation to ‘deflect’ people from the ‘fact’ to another aspect of the article. So it ‘looks like’ they have fact-checked and dismissed the claims, but in reality they fact-checked some other aspect of the article. It’s a mind-game. It basically gives the impression that someone is posting something ‘wrong’ because the ‘fact-check’ warning comes up over the top of the article. But when you visit the fact-check, they are not even disputing the claim, they are just deflecting to something else.

When I come across it again, I’ll remember to update this post to show you, but I encourage anyone to ‘fact-check’ the ‘fact-checkers’ – follow any references they cite (which some of them do, and some of them don’t), and when you follow the reference, see if it actually says what they claim it says. They also use “we called “expert x” and they said this isn’t true. No recording, no video, no evidence that the “expert x” exists, or that ‘expert x’ is able to refute the claim.

The whole media right now is dirty and corrupt and we really need to carefully listen and read anything they say to discern what they claim because it’s out of control now – never before have we realized just how manipulative they are.

They are useful when they are correct, but unfortunately they are being used as a tool to deceive, so you have to do your due diligence on them, because their main goal right now is to “get the jab into all arms”, detract you from the great reset, defend their sponsors, and call anyone – even those who make vaccines for a living or who suffered injuries from the injections- an “antivaxxer” or I’ve seen “right-wing” and they’ve even hijacked “covidiot” or any kind of ‘derogative, dismissive’ trigger-word, they’ve implanted into the media to trigger you to feel “bad” or “wrong” or “dumb” if you share.

Ego is an easy thing to attack – people don’t want to be caught spreading “wrong” information – they don’t want their intelligence challenged, so they immediately delete their own post before any of their friends see what they posted.

Now, this is actually good if it’s a chain-mail meme or actual false information – but they are doing this with the truth, so we have a big problem here, this weapon is very effective. The AI will flag the post, the fact-checkers will create the article to refute it, and noone gets to see any other truth other than this new world government.

This has been an ingenious addition to the media’s weapon. Most people may question the news, but then to “learn more” might do a quick google search, and then find these “independent fact-checker sites” that claim they are not biased, or political, and ask for donations to give the impression they are not being funded, and all the things we want to hear – all the tricks that make us trust them more, and yet – this new form of Journalism is funded by those who are part of this agenda, or paid by pharmaceutical companies. Some of the articles get paid upwards of $45,000 per fact-check.

If you want to learn more about the damage they have done, search for “Who fact-checks the fact-checkers”. Or search for who has been censored by them. I have so much to add but no time to add them all but definitely want to let you know that this is happening – these Fact-Checkers are “disinformation” for the agenda – along with Wikipedia, Google, Facebook, Media, Journal Publications – they’ve covered all your go-to’s.

You can also do a search on my “verifiable references” post and compare that to all the mainstream fact-checkers. All my sources are referenced – compare my references to their “fact-check” for yourself. Spend an afternoon down “fact-checker lane”.

Click to expand

Show less