5/8 – Evil Intent Concerns

Dr Andreas Noack

A German research chemist Dr Andreas Noack (did his PhD on Graphene & worked for leading manufacturer of carbon nanoparticles) published his graphene hydroxide video on Nov 23, 2021 and 20-30 minutes after the interview, suffered a sudden ‘invisible’ torturous attack and died on Nov 26, 2021.

Earlier videos and a PDF he created (on his widow’s telegram channel) suggest that he predicted he would be taken out, was expecting and at peace with it except that he hoped to get out the information that he wanted to get out before it happened. Browsing through his past videos on his wife’s channel, suggests to me that he was on a mission, that humanity and integrity came first.

In response to the Pablo Campra Micro-Raman Spectroscopy paper “Detection Of Graphene In Covid19 Vaccines” ^{(01) Dropbox – FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT ON GRAPHENE DETECTION IN COVID VACCINES where the presence of Graphene Oxide is determined in the samples from Pfzer, Astrazeneca, Moderna and Janssen | Verify Document | ResearchGate} he stated that Graphene hydroxide (not Graphene Oxide) was found in all the vaccines studied and that they act like microscopic razor blades in the blood stream that can cut the blood vessels. He said they do not decompose and the longer they are in the bloodstream, the more damage will be done over time, and it destroys your heart. He also said the reason the athletes are dropping dead is because they have fast-flowing blood (the faster the blood flows, the more damage the razors do). And he said the epithel cells are extremely smooth for good reason but because rough when cut up with these razor blades and then things stick to it.

See full post, including a full transcript of the main video that ended his life.

• He was a Carbon Chemist “Andreas Noack Studierte at the TU Darmstadt Chemie und PhD 1995 über ein Thema aus dem Bereich der heterogenisierten Catalysis. Danach works for the Chemviron Carbon/Calgon Carbon in Business Development.“
• Patent Search for “Andreas Noack” (69 Results)
• Pubmed Search for “Andreas Noack” (19 Results)

See also: A 2016 paper “Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms” – Page 14 states “Furthermore, the sharpened edges of GNS may act as ‘blades’, inserting and cutting through bacterial cell membranes“. ^{(02) Ou, Lingling et al. “Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms.” Particle and fibre toxicology vol. 13,1 57. 31 Oct. 2016, doi:10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y | PDF (03) Akhavan O, Ghaderi E. Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano. 2010 Oct 26;4(10):5731-6. doi: 10.1021/nn101390x. PMID: 20925398.}

Looking at the TGA site – they say they test each batch but try and find more than the “promise” to do so. Try and find the results, the testing methods, it’s non-existent (or tell me where it is – I spent a few hours searching and couldn’t locate any proof that they test each batch, but last year when I looked, I found batch reports (which I can’t find now but hope I have screenshotted and downloaded somewhere) of the list of batches they tested and the comment next to most of them was that they don’t “re-test” when new lots arrive with the same pre-tested numbers on them – preferring to trust the manufacture at their word).

This is a problem because:

1. ) Toxic Batches are common:
   1. every 200th batch is Statistically-Toxic in some countries – across all brands – so “something” has changed – “something” is different once in every 200 batches – are they experimenting with different formulas, is it a particular country, why is this happening?
   2. NZ has identified toxic batches coming from Spain
   3. Japan had 1.6 million doses of Moderna recalled with contamination of ‘stainless steel’ and ‘white floating matter’ and ‘black particles‘ and ‘unidentified pink substances‘ (they’ve had 4 separate recalls the last time I looked it up)
   4. There is a website tracking bad batches by one of the good guys here.
2. ) This is a Global Experiment:
   1. They are mix-matching different brands “on a whim” with no long-term safety data or public disclosure of what ‘really is in the vials and what they can do to the genome’ – why the hell people are signing up for multiple different brands is beyond reason, people are truly brain-washed to think this is a safe thing to do – what the hell people, what the hell.
   2. They aren’t your standard run-of-the-mill ‘vaccines’ – they are gene-editing drugs ^{(04)mRNA Vaccines = Gene Therapy – World Health Summit “We probably would have had a 95% refusal rate’ for these shots two years ago, but the pandemic and marketing of the injections as ‘vaccines’ has made them popular with the … Click for full citation} – that were re-labelled / branded “vaccines” so that they could ride the tails of the vaccine-debate and all the literature and media-messages and promotions that pharma & WHO have invested so deeply into already, so that you could have a “science-denier” narrative in your marketing campaign – but calling it a vaccine is just a con-job – it really is. You are conning people into experimenting with your hoo-ha. Whenever you admit to doing it, the media won’t share those bits, so the public is so mortifyingly misinformed about what these things are, that it’s absolutely beyond criminal now – we’re now talking either deliberate or “just-following-orders-policy-driven” democide.
   3. A universal enforced flu shot was planned. I mean – just that alone should’ve raised alarm bells.
   4. The “vaccines” are designed from a computer upload from Wuhan. You are injecting people with a vial containing ingredients designed from the very place accused of releasing a bioweapon.
   5. The positive-test for the virus only exists as a result of a paper by a corrupt company who manufactures the tests and it was approved by WHO “the next day” after it was submitted, and globally we immediately started to use the test even though “the science says” it cannot be used as per that publication. And all of this makes sense if you’ve read all the tabletop exercises which unfortunately I’ve had the displeasure of inflicting my mind to. See tabletop exercises. The fact that they have used this test for everything to do with these vaccines, to show they work – means that even their “science” is fuckery. Absolute fuckery.
   6. Oh my god, I’m having a day. I’ll skip this section for now before I go on more of a tangent. See also: PCR-Tests posts.

Point is – it’s very suspicious that they wouldn’t test every single batch from known-criminal companies with new experimental technology at warp-speed.

Charles Lieber has 66 patents which are being used as scaffolds and wires and nanosensors and semiconductors in all vaccines as described here. ^{(05)Lieber, Charles 66 patents which are being used as scaffolds and wires and nanosensors and semiconductors in all vaccines as described here: … Click for full citation}

At the beginning of the pandemic if you remember, Charles Lieber, a Harvard nanotechnology researcher with decades of experience, was indicted by the DOJ for fraud in collaboration with the Wuhan University of Technology.  ^{(06) Justice.gov link to arrest of Charles Lieber (01-28-2020) https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related}

Charles Lieber received millions of dollars in grant money from the US Department of Defence, specifically the military think tanks DARPA, AFOSR, and ONR, as well as NIH and MITRE. His specialty is the use of silicon nanowires in lieu of patch clamp electrodes to monitor and modulate intracellular activity, something he has been working on at Harvard for the past twenty years.

He was claimed to have been working on silicon nanowire batteries in China, but none of his colleagues can recall him ever having worked on battery technology in his life; all of his research deals with bionanotechnology, or the blending of nanotech with living cells.

Charles Lieber’s own papers describe the use of silicon nanowires for brain-computer interfaces, or “neural lace” technology. His papers describe how neurons can endocytose whole silicon nanowires or parts of them, monitoring and even modulating neuronal activity.

Charles Lieber was a colleague of Robert Langer (an expert in nanotech drug delivery) and who is one of the co-founders of Moderna.

Both Charles Lieber and Robert Langer’s bibliographies describe, essentially, techniques for human enhancement, i.e. transhumanism.

Charles Lieber has worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, and according to the press-release video above, was paid one and a half million dollars to setup a research lab in Wuhan, China, at the same time as receiving research grants from Harvard & NIH. ^{(07) Justice.gov link to indictment of Charles Lieber (06-09-2020) https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-indicted-false-statement-charges}

One of his Patents is for Nanobots (‘nanoscale devices’) with “ballistic transport” for which “carriers can be injected” that can include metal electrodes including nickel, gold, silver, copper, zinc, cadmium, iron, nickel, cobalt, aluminum, chromium, platinum, tungsten, or the like. It also gives an example that ‘an electrode or other device may be in electrical communication with both the nanoscale wire and the non-nanoscale electrical contact, where the junctions between such components are not Schottky barriers’ (energy barriers for electrons). The invention includes a method for preparing nanostructures. And that nanoscale wires can be “grown” using chemical vapor depositions and that the nanoscale wires can also be “doped” by introducing the doping element into the vapor phase reactant, and more… read the patent here:

Patent US 7,858,965 – Nanowire Heterostructures ^{(08) Patent US 7,858,965 – Nanowire Heterostructures https://patents.google.com/patent/US7858965B2/en – Charles Lieber}

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

“NIH-Funded Nanotechnology Patents by Charles Lieber”

NIH-funded Nanotechnology Patents has Charles Lieber’s name all over them.

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Patents by Rockefeller University (I haven’t done a search for this yet to see how many there are – I suspect hundreds – I randomly came across this one today which I thought I’d note):

“NIH -Rockefeller Remote-Control Cells”

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Anthony Fauci, NIH / NIAID, Gain of Function (Bioweapon) Research, massive amounts of conflict$ with all the pharma arms and blah blah blah – just like Gates, Fauci’s hands are all over everything to do with this pandemic.

I know I have a few PDFs somewhere full of the patents, so don’t think this is a full list, this is just a “I have this page open so I’m noting it” – but the Fauci/COVID Dossier is one of them that I can list right now.

The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08, issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. ^{(09) National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08, issued to Dr. Ralph Baric, funded by NIAID (Dr Anthony Fauci)}

As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit. (Source: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 2000) In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full-length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.

• Download: The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier (PDF) ^{(10) The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier (PDF)}
• Read: Following The Patents: Covid-19 & Medical Tyranny (6 Feb 2022) ^{(11) Fauci’s involvement in Corona Following The Patents: Covid-19 & Medical Tyranny (6 Feb 2022)}
• See My Pandemic Timeline for when I started noting down all the Bioweapon / Fauci connections

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

“NIH – Remote Control of Cells using Magnetic Field”

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

“DARPA – Body-Monitoring the Bloodstream & Stimulating Nerves & Organs”

DARPA’s ElectRx program (Electric Prescriptions) is funding research into tiny embedded devices that can monitor conditions inside the body and stimulate particular nerves in response, “enhancing the body’s self-healing abilities”. DARPA is examining health on a nano scale through its electrical prescriptions (ElectRx) program. ^{(12) DARPA’s fascinating self-healing body initiative – ElectRx – Article – 20 Apr 2021 http://tisfightback.com/darpas-fascinating-self-healing-body-initiative-electrx (13) DARPA – Electrical Prescriptions (ElectRx) – https://www.darpa.mil/program/electrical-prescriptions}

• “Imagine a device far tinier, that could be delivered through a needle. This device could be designed to constantly monitor certain conditions in the body, and then directly stimulate certain nerve pathways to trigger the body’s correct response mechanism when it’s not working as it should be. Let’s say blood sugar regulation isn’t working properly in a diabetic – this technology could potentially detect a blood sugar level anomaly and trigger the pancreas to release glucagon or insulin to sort it out”.
• As tiny as a single nerve fibre, an ElectRx device would sit in the body monitoring the bloodstream or electrical environment for a particular signal, at which point it would stimulate a targeted nerve in order to produce a desired outcome. The possibilities are incredibly broad, both good and bad.

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents to it’s own post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

I have much more on DARPA’s investments in remote-controlling humans in another post (that is still in draft-mode).

Karen Kingston – former Pfizer employee and biotech analyst.

Karen Kingston is a Biotech Analyst and yet another former Pfizer employee who is speaking out. She began her career as a Pfizer sales rep in NYC. She’s a pharmaceutical and medical device business analyst over 20 years of experience in business development, marketing, sales, public speaking, and strategic consulting. As an executive strategist, her clients range from start-ups to Fortune 500 leaders, including Allergan, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Evidence of Graphene Oxide in EUA ‘VACCINES‘ (Moderna and Pfizer)
August, 2021 (Powerpoint Presentation)

Suspicious Patents under the guise of Health & ‘VACCINES”
Totalitarian Vaccine/Social Credit System Patents & Mandatory Apps
October, 2021 (Powerpoint Presentation)

Vaccine patents that detail the evil intent
October, 2021 (PDF Presentation | Video) ^{(14) Karen Kingston – Biotech Analyst – PDF Presentation – Vaccine Patents}

“Karen Kingston – Pfizer, Moderna”

// Update June 2nd 2022 – Moved Patents and her video presentation to the “Patents” post to try and decrease the size of this post which keeps crashing my website

Pfizer Whistleblowers

• Melissa McAtee Confirms Graphene Oxide Coverup in Internal Pfizer Emails, the Covid Vaccines GLOW when there’s a dark background, the cover-up of aborted foetal cell lines, & details the corruption inside the Vaccine Manufacturing plant (Feb 2022)
• Chris Croce, Pfizer Senior Associate Scientist (Hidden camera) admits he feels like he works for an evil corporation – that it’s all about money – and that natural immunity is better.
• Rahul Khandke, Pfizer Scientist (Hidden camera) admits Pfizer staff are bred to be vaccine-advocates with endless seminars and constantly told you can’t talk to the public. He also shares that your antibodies are probably better than vaccination.
• Former Chief Scientist and Vice-President of Pfizer Respiratory & Allergy Research, Dr. Michael Yeadon says there is Clear Evidence of Fraud in the Pfizer study, explains how they exaggerated risks, explains variants and viruses, warns of Vaccine passports and the end of human freedoms.

See the “Former Pfizer Staff Speak Out” post.

A whistleblower from Ventavia (clinical trial director in charge of one of the Pfizer trials) blew the whistle on the data integrity issues in the Pfizer trial via the British Medical Journal. She’s now suing them.

1. Graphene oxide disrupts mitochondrial homeostasis – Analysis ^{(15) Graphene oxide disrupts mitochondrial homeostasis – Analysis (16)Xiaoli, F.; Yaqing, Z.; Ruhui, L.; Xuan, L.; Aijie, C.; Yanli, Z.; Longquan, S. (2021). Graphene oxide disrupted mitochondrial homeostasis through inducing intracellular redox deviation and autophagy-lysosomal … Click for full citation}
2. Graphene oxide quantum dot-based memristors – Analysis ^{(17) Graphene oxide quantum dot-based memristors – Analysis (18)Yan, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, P. (2018). Graphene oxide quantum dots based memristors with progressive conduction tuning for artificial synaptic learning. Advanced Functional … Click for full citation}
3. Graphene oxide can adsorb and absorb CO2 ^{(19) Graphene oxide can adsorb and absorb CO2}
4. The spintronics of graphene Has Pandora’s box been uncovered here?  ^{(20) The spintronics of graphene Has Pandora’s box been uncovered here?} 

I found an article and corresponding paper that showed that you could “control the heart cells on command” using Graphene.

Graphene allows you to pace cells at will

Graphene allows you to pace cells at will

• Graphene Biointerface Optically Controls Heart Cells ^{(21) Article Graphene Biointerface Optically Controls Heart Cells}
• Manage laboratory-grown heart cells by remote control ^{(22) Article Manage laboratory-grown heart cells by remote control}
• Graphene biointerfaces for optical stimulation of cells ^{(23) Savchenko A, Cherkas V, Liu C, Braun GB, Kleschevnikov A, Miller YI, Molokanova E. Graphene biointerfaces for optical stimulation of cells. Sci Adv. 2018 May 18;4(5):eaat0351. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat0351. PMID: 29795786; PMCID: PMC5959318.}

What the hell? Sorry to sound all “conspiracy” but all these “convenient deaths” of those who are speaking out, suddenly having heart attacks and dying, let alone the ever increasing cardiac reports from athletes and other vaccine victims, and even our own health authorities have not hid the Myocarditis/Pericarditis link but they down-play it as “very rare” and since there’s already people in my little town that are suffering with it, let alone my online friends and the vaccine victims groups – I am thinking we have a very different idea of the “rare” definition.

VAERS OCT 1 2021

That’s without getting into the “unverifiable” NWO Dr Lawrence Dunegan interview where he stated that back in 1969 “There is now a way to simulate a real heart attack. It can be used as a means of assassination.”

Graphene & the Brain

1. Interaction of graphene oxide with brain cells – Analysis ^{(24) Interaction of graphene oxide with brain cells Analysis (25)Rauti, R.; Lozano, N.; Leon, V.; Scaini, D.; Musto, M.; Rago, I.; Ballerini, L. (2016). Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Reshape Synaptic Function in Cultured Brain Networks = Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Reshape Synaptic … Click for full citation (26)Mendonca, MCP; Soares, ES; de Jesus, MB; Ceragioli, H. J.; Batista, Â.G.; Nyúl-Tóth, Á.; da Cruz-Hofling, MA (2016). PEGylation of Reduced Graphene Oxide Induces Toxicity in Cells of the Blood–Brain Barrier: … Click for full citation}
2. Graphene nanoparticles targeting siRNA delivery in the brain – Analysis ^{(27) Graphene nanoparticles targeting siRNA delivery in the brain – Analysis (28)Joo, J.; Kwon, EJ; Kang, J.; Skalak, M.; Anglin, EJ; Mann, AP; Sailor, M.J. (2016). Porous silicon–graphene oxide core–shell nanoparticles for targeted delivery of siRNA to the injured brain. Nanoscale … Click for full citation}
3. Graphene oxide is able to overcome the blood-brain barrier and directly affect the brain- Analysis ^{(29) Graphene oxide is able to overcome the blood-brain barrier and directly affect the brain- Analysis (30)Mendonca, MCP; Soares, ES; de Jesus, MB; Ceragioli, H. J.; Ferreira, MS; Catharino, R.R.; da Cruz-Höfling, MA (2015). Reduced graphene oxide induces transient blood–brain barrier opening: an in vivo study = … Click for full citation (31)Bai, H.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Shi, G. (2010). A pH-sensitive graphene oxide composite hydrogel = A pH-sensitive graphene oxide composite hydrogel. Chemical Communications, 46(14), … Click for full citation (32) Baldrighi M.; Trusel M.; Tonini R.; Giordani S. (2016) Carbon nanomaterials interfacing with neurons: an in vivo perspective. Frontiers in neuroscience, 10, 250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00250 (33) Campra, P. (2021). [Report]. Detection of graphene oxide in aqueous suspension (Comirnaty™ RD1): Observational study in light and electron microscopy. University of Almería. https://docdro.id/rNgtxyh (34)Hu, X.; Yu, Y.; Hou, W.; Zhou, J.; Song, L. (2013). Effects of particle size and pH value on the hydrophilicity of graphene oxide. Applied Surface Science, 273, … Click for full citation (35)Mendonca, MCP; Soares, ES; de Jesus, MB; Ceragioli, H. J.; Batista, Â.G.; Nyúl-Tóth, Á.; da Cruz-Hofling, MA (2016a). PEGylation of Reduced Graphene Oxide Induces Toxicity in Cells of the Blood–Brain Barrier: … Click for full citation (36)Mendonca, MCP; Soares, ES; de Jesus, MB; Ceragioli, H. J.; Batista, Â.G.; Nyúl-Tóth, Á.; da Cruz-Hofling, MA (2016b) Reduced graphene oxide: nanotoxicological profile in rats = Reduced graphene oxide: … Click for full citation (37)Rauti, R.; Lozano, N.; Leon, V.; Scaini, D.; Musto, M.; Rago, I.; Ballerini, L. (2016). Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Reshape Synaptic Function in Cultured Brain Networks = Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Reshape Synaptic … Click for full citation (38)Zhang, Y.; Ali, S.F.; Dervishi, E.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Casciano, D.; Biris, AS (2010). Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells ACS nano, … Click for full citation}
4. Neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases caused by graphene oxide – Analysis “graphene oxide affects the normal functioning of the immune system, causing it to be inhibited or not function properly.” ^{(39) Neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases caused by graphene oxide – Analysis (40)Chen, H. T.; Wu, H.Y.; Shih, CH; Jan, TR (2015). A differential effect of graphene oxide on the production of proinflammatory cytokines by murine microglia = A Differential Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Production of … Click for full citation (41)Chen, H. T.; Wu, H.Y.; Shih, CH; Jan, TR (2015). A differential effect of graphene oxide on the production of proinflammatory cytokines by murine microglia = A Differential Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Production of … Click for full citation (42)Dowaidar, M. (2021). Neuroinflammation caused by activated microglia and astrocytes may contribute to the progression of pathogenic damage to substantia nigra neurons, playing a role in the progression of Parkinson’s disease = … Click for full citation}

Graphene & Mind Control

1. Graphene oxide and brain stimulation by electromagnetic waves EM capable of inferring in the human mind – Analysis “a person inoculated with graphene oxide would have nanotransducers that they could penetrate the BBB blood-brain barrier and act according to the signals emitted by electromagnetic waves, to infer the mechanisms of conditional behavior, similar to those described in Pavlov’s experiment.” “non-genetic remote optical modulation of neuronal activity, by means of diffuse graphene nanostructures.” “RF radiofrequency waves “activate the ferritin -tagged channels through a biochemical pathway,” which increases free iron levels. This could explain the magnetic effects.” ^{(43) Graphene oxide and brain stimulation by electromagnetic waves EM capable of inferring in the human mind – Analysis (44)Li, X.; Xiong, H.; Rommelfanger, N.; Xu, X.; Youn, J.; Slesinger, PA; Qin, Z. (2021). Nanotransducers for wireless neuromodulation = Nanotransducers for wireless neuromodulation. Matter, 4(5), … Click for full citation (45)Beyene, AG; Delevich, K.; Del Bonis-O’Donnell, JT; Piekarski, D.J.; Lin, W.C.; Thomas, A.W.; Landry, MP (2019). Imaging striatal dopamine release using a nongenetically encoded near infrared fluorescent … Click for full citation (46) Bitterman, ME (2006). Classical conditioning since Pavlov = Classical conditioning since Pavlov. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), p. 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F1089-2680.10.4.365 (47)Chen, Y.; Fu, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, L.; Yuan, D.; Liu, P. (2019). Millimeter wave absorbing property of flexible graphene/acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber composite in 5G frequency band. Polymer-Plastics … Click for full citation (48)Hernandez-Morales, M.; Shang, T.; Chen, J.; Han, V.; Liu, C. (2020). Lipid oxidation induced by RF waves and mediated by ferritin iron causes activation of ferritin-tagged ion channels. Cell reports, 30(10), … Click for full citation (49)Huang, W.C.; Chi, H.S.; Lee, YC; Lo, YC; Liu, T. C.; Chiang, M.Y.; Chen, S.Y. (2019). Gene-Embedded Nanostructural Biotic–Abiotic Optoelectrode Arrays Applied for Synchronous Brain Optogenetics and Neural Signal … Click for full citation (50) Koob, G.F. (1992). Dopamine, addiction and reward = Dopamine, addiction and reward. In Seminars in Neuroscience, 4(2), p. 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/1044-5765(92)90012-Q (51)Mendonca, MCP; Soares, ES; de Jesus, MB; Ceragioli, H. J.; Ferreira, MS; Catharino, R.R.; da Cruz-Höfling, MA (2015). Reduced graphene oxide induces transient blood–brain barrier opening: an in vivo study = … Click for full citation (52)Shepherd, J. (2015). Optogenetics in action: tiny wireless LEDs in mice let you control their … Click for full citation (53)Patriarchi, T.; Cho, JR; Merten, K.; Howe, MW; Marley, A.; Xiong, W. H.; Tian, ​​L. (2018). Ultrafast neuronal imaging of dopamine dynamics with designed genetically encoded sensors. Science, … Click for full citation (54)Perini, G.; Palmieri, V.; Ciasca, G.; De Spirito, M.; Daddy, M. (2020). Unraveling the potential of graphene quantum dots in biomedicine and neuroscience. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(10), … Click for full citation (55)Rastogi, S.K.; Garg, R.; Scopelliti, M.G.; Pinto, B. I.; Hartung, J.E.; Kim, S.; Cohen-Karni, T. (2020). Remote nongenetic optical modulation of neuronal activity using fuzzy graphene. Proceedings of the … Click for full citation (56)Ren, H.; Kulkarni, D.D.; Kodiyath, R.; Xu, W.; Choi, I.; Tsukruk, V.V. (2014). Competitive Adsorption of Dopamine and Rhodamine 6G on the Surface of Graphene Oxide. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 6(4), … Click for full citation}
2. GRAPHENE is a superconductive and highly integrative with neuron cells in the brain. Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells – Frontiers Neuorsci, Apr 2018 ^{(57) Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells Front. Syst. Neurosci., 11 April 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00012}
3. The molecules of GRAPHENE can interact with neurons in the brain in a remote mode using different radio-frequencies (5G could be one of these) , they can map the brain and transmit and receive INSTRUCTIONS remotely. Magnetogentics ^{(58) Magnetogenetics, or the use of electromagnetic control, involves activating cells using magnetic fields. With magnetogenetics researchers have found a way to control neurons with electromagnets. https://www.noldus.com/applications/magnetogenetics}

Possibly Related (no Graphene mentioned)

• Engineering Brain Parasites for Intracellular Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins – 2018 ^{(59)Engineering Brain Parasites for Intracellular Delivery of Therapeutic ProteinsShahar Bracha, Karoliina Hassi, Paul D. Ross, Stuart Cobb, Lilach Sheiner, Oded Rechavi … Click for full citation}

Self-Assembling Nanotubes with Electric Fields