Denying Graphene in the Vials
- European Parliament
- Australian Parliament
- Fact-Checkers (the marketing-arm of Pharma and invited guests to DAVOS and on the boards of WEF, Pfizer, in addition to receiving financing from Gates, Governments, and the like, so nothing they say can be trusted – they are being used as a weapon in this war – the most intelligent idea our psychotic globalists came up with)
European Parliament
“Time for the truth on the presence of graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines”
| 24 January 2022 | P-000303/2022 |
| Sergio Beriato (ECR) |
A recent investigation by Dr Ricardo Delgado Martin (01) and the technical report by Dr Pablo Campra ‘Detection of graphene in COVID vaccines by micro-Raman spectroscopy’ claim that the COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene. (02) (03) (04)
As reported by CORDIS in 2018, a team of researchers has proven that graphene is able to convert electronic signals into signals in the terahertz range, with trillions of cycles per second. (05)
The silicon-based electronic components we use today generate clock speeds in the GHz range, where 1 GHz is equal to 1 000 million cycles per second. The scientists showed that graphene can convert signals with these frequencies into signals with frequencies that are thousands of times higher than those created by silicon.
Graphene is therefore able to absorb radiation, meaning that, if contained in a vaccine, it would be highly toxic and harmful to human health.
In the light of this recent investigation, does the Commission intend to have an independent laboratory perform a careful analysis to check for the presence of graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines?
Response:
| 8 March 2022 | P-000303/2022(ASW) |
| Answer given by Ms Stella Kyriakides – Pharmaceutical Puppet on behalf of the European Commission |
In the EU a marketing authorisation is granted to a medicinal product only after its quality, safety and efficacy have been evaluated and a positive benefit-risk balance related to its use has been concluded. For EU authorisations of COVID-19 vaccines this assessment is carried out by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
EMA has analysed reports describing the analysis of several vials of COVID-19 vaccines suggesting the presence of graphene and concluded that the currently available data do not show presence of graphene in the vaccines concerned. The analysis by EMA’s working party for biological medicines included an input on the Raman spectroscopy from the European Directorate for Quality of Medicines and the independent national testing laboratories responsible for batch release (OMCLs).
Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture or formulation of any of the COVID-19 vaccines or other medicines, so it would not be present at manufacturing facilities and there is no obvious way that it could get into the vaccines. Quality control testing and quality assurance review, by the vaccine manufacturers and OMCLs responsible for batch release, confirm that each batch met all quality standards prior to release. No product complaints have been received for the batches mentioned in the paper. The presence of graphene or graphene derivatives in the vaccines therefore are not plausible.
The Commission and EMA do not consider that any further actions are necessary at this stage.
Translation: “We looked at the reports, but we’re going to trust the manufacturers word and not look into it further… no independent lab analysis from the government needed… plus we’ve invested over a billion Euro into our Graphene goldmine, let alone these vaccines contracts…
(oh my god– this bit!..)
Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture or formulation of any of the COVID-19 vaccines or other medicines, so it would not be present at manufacturing facilities and there is no obvious way that it could get into the vaccines”
— Notice the clever wordsmithing? It’s not stating that Graphene isn’t in it.. what a clever fox you are, little Ms Deceiver of Humanity / Pharmaceutical Puppet.
I would also suggest to Sergio, re-ask your question using the terminology “graphene or any derivatives” – because looking at her answer, she is saying “no to graphene”, but there are so many derivatives of graphene that come under different names, that she may be doing a little by-pass there as well.
The yellow above is just such interesting wording. So “graphene oxide” is not used in the manufacture/formulation thereby no obvious way it could get into the vaccines. That is not the same thing as saying “there is no graphene oxide in the vaccines”, just saying “there’s no obvious way”. Since graphene oxide and graphene-derivates of all sorts are used in everything now, including machinery, including water, including that saline-graphene patent we already mentioned, including clothing – her answer is not good enough. There is a lot of reasons to suspect there is this or something like this in the vials and saying ‘there is no obvious way” is literally a mind-game / trick / voodoo / clever copywriting.
- See also:
- The European Union invested one billion euros in a project called The Graphene Flagship
“Europe Has Invested €1 Billion Into Graphene—But For What? Six years into an ambitious 10-year research project, experts weigh in on whether the Graphene Flagship can help the “wonder material” make it through the Valley of Death” – June 2019
Australian Parliament
“Verify whether Covid-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide”
| 22 September 2021 | Petition EN3128 |
| Verify whether Covid-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide (06) |
There are doctors around the world that are voicing concerns that the Covid-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide, which is a known as toxic. Full disclosure of the ingredients of Covid-19 vaccines need to be declared as part of informed consent before administering Covid-19 vaccines.
We therefore ask the House to ensure there is full disclosure as to whether the Covid-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide, and that informed consent of all the ingredients of the Covid-19 vaccines are provided prior to administering Covid-19 vaccines.
Response:
| 21 November 2021 | EN3128 Response |
| Greg ‘Great Reset’ Hunt – Minister for Health – with no Health Qualifications – and World Economic Forum Puppet/Director of Strategy (07) | |
| 14 February 2022 | Hansard Entry |
(Should people in our governments wear their sponsorship badges like the athletes do, so that we know where there loyalties really lie when they are giving a response?)
Dear Chair
I refer to your correspondence of 18 October 2021 concerning EN3128 requesting the disclosure of the COVID-19 vaccine ingredients.
The safety of the Australian population has always been the highest priority of the Australian Government. For this reason, decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccines have been guided by the expert medical advice of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI).
The Government is working closely with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the ATAGI and all state and territory health departments to ensure that monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine safety is of the highest possible standard in Australia.
The TGA formally assesses the safety, quality and efficacy of medicines, including vaccines, prior to their approval for use in Australia. All vaccines must pass the TGA’s rigorous assessment and approval processes, after being tested in large clinical trials on thousands of people. Technical experts analyse the three phases of clinical trials test for safety at every phase, as well as how effective the vaccine is at protecting against infection and/or disease.
All COVID-19 vaccines used in the rollout have been granted provisional approval following a complete assessment of all this available data. No part of the process has been rushed and the TGA does not have an ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ pathway for COVID-19 vaccines.
The TGA is open and transparent about safety information relating to COVID-19 vaccines, including any suspected side effects or potential safety issues. The TGA publishes a weekly safety report, including information about reported suspected side effects, as well as other safety alerts as required. More information can be found at: www.tga.gov.au using the search terms ‘COVID-19-vaccine safety monitoring and reporting’.
Although graphene oxide may serve as a potential vaccine carrier to help activate immunity, none of the COVID-19 vaccines approved and in use in Australia include graphene oxide.
The AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria), Pfizer, and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine Product Information (PI) leaflets are publicly available on the TGA website, listing the ingredients in each vaccine. The PIs are required as supporting documents for regulatory approval. None of the PI’s for these vaccines list graphene oxide as an ingredient and is therefore not present.
The goal is to protect all people in Australia from the harm caused COVID-19 infection, through preventing serious illness and death, and where possible, disease transmission. The Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines have all been proven through approval and safety monitoring processes to be very effective at reducing severe illness, hospitalisation and death.
From 1 October 2021, all Australians aged 12 years and over are now eligible to receive a COVID 19 vaccine. Australians aged 60 years and over are now eligible to receive a Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, while those aged 18 years or over can choose to have the AstraZeneca vaccine after providing informed consent.
It is important for Australians to have access to credible and timely information about COVID-19 vaccines. It is a large and complex project, and the information you are seeking may change over time- that is why we strongly encourage all Australians stay up-to-date on all news and announcements, by regularly checking my Department’s website at: www.health.gov.au.
Vaccination remains the most effective way for people to protect themselves from the effects of COVID-19. The Government encourages everyone to be vaccinated as soon as they are eligible.
Thank you for writing on this matter.
Yours sincerely
from the Minister for Health and Aged Care, Mr Hunt
Translation: Our “Health” Committees are hired on the Sustainable Development / NWO / Great Reset agenda and our government is just a front for the UN (& Australia was sold-out decades ago), therefore we’re going to continue to lie to the people and give them the illusion there is someone actually giving a shit about their health, when we really don’t care – and “I am the Minister for Health with no Health expertize – but I did work for the World Economic Forum as the Director of Strategy and I am the sole person in charge of an Unlimited Budget for the COVID pandemic “vaccines”, which I’ve used to pretty much funnel billions to Globalist-Shareholders and crush Australian small businesses, industries, and families. In the meantime, please don’t see if there’s any connections in my family to Graphene.. and P.S. I’m retiring in a moment…”
This line irks me… The goal is to protect all people in Australia from the harm caused COVID-19 infection, through preventing serious illness and death, and where possible, disease transmission. If you weren’t Evil-in-Disguise, the goal would be to protect all people from harm. Not ’caused by COVID infection’ because the ‘infection’ is whatever poison you are somehow exposing us to. These shots don’t stop transmission, and they don’t prevent serious illness or death. #canteven
See also:
- Australia Conflict$ of Interest Video and browse the Conflicts of Interest posts or to see who is behind Australia’s “health” (Health?) “harm” agenda.
- “Australia’s First Commercial Graphene Plant” “The plant will produce up to 10 tonnes of graphene per year. Two tonnes of the graphene in the first year will be for products and customers in the Australian manufacturing sector.” – Eco Investor May 2016
- Muse over: Health Minister Hunt’s Family Involvement in Graphene and Vaxines (I haven’t been able to verify this)
- Young Global Leaders (WEF) – starring Greg Hunt.
- The Great Reset is Real
The “Fact Checkers”
A Snopes.com fact-check (propaganda-narrative-upholder) on Karen Kingston’s “Graphene is in the Vaccines” video, refers to “Reuters” (another “propaganda-narrative-upholder” fact-checker) throughout and says:
“Graphene oxide is not included in the ingredient lists of any filings for either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Speaking to Reuters, Pfizer’s senior associate of global media relations said that, “Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.” Arguments suggesting that they do, therefore, rest on “independent research” that purports to have uncovered nefarious secrets by scouring the internet for hints.“
Well to you I call… “Bull. Shit”.
- Frankly, we can’t believe a word that Reuters says about Pfizer, because of the Pfizer Director and Reuters President & CEO (and WEF Co-Chair Int’l biz advisory) connection.
- “Graphene oxide is not included in the ingredient lists of any filings” – So what? They show 2 different formulations in their toxicity studies – that they submitted for FDA approval – even though it was a 3rd formula – a different “variation” of the product that got “approved” lol.. so I say, “so what” – their trial was a fraud, their submissions to FDA were a fraud, and they are lying about their formulations. So if an ingredient isn’t listed on a filing, how the hell can that be “proof” when they lied about everything else and they are the most corrupt industry on the planet with a history of convicted fraud dating back decades?
- They linked to a “Reuters fact-check” titled Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide which stated this as it’s proof:
“Pfizer told Reuters its vaccines do not contain the material.”.
You can’t make this up but apparently that’s all the public needs as proof these days – actually they don’t even read the articles anymore, they just see that something has been “Fact-Checked” and that’s good enough for them. These guys get paid, what, like 40 grand per article and the best evidence they can come up with is “Pfizer told us” – which obviously means absolutely nothing since they are pretty much “working for Pfizer”.
The phrase in the Snopes fact-check: “Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture” is not a denial of Graphene in the vaccines. It’s just clever copy-writing that is good-enough to fool the masses. There are many formulations of Graphene-based derivatives and there’s no “standardization” for graphene-oxide formulas, and Pfizer’s own IP has 280 secret ingredients. Release those details and you might be able to fact-check, in the meantime, you are just another fraudulent fake-news pusher hiding behind the clever-deceptive-marketing use of the words “fact-checker”.
I’m not going to fact-check-the-fact-checkers’ entire article because I want to move onto another topic tonight, but to address this business with the “colouring” of Graphene… they wrote:
“Even more problematic for those who claim that graphene oxide has been added to mRNA vaccines is the coloring. These vaccines are clear to mildly cloudy, but as highlighted by Reuter’s, Matthew Diasio, an American Chemical Society Congressional Science & Engineering fellow, stated that a sample that contained even 1% of graphene oxide would look dark if not black.“
- Again they refer to “Reuters” as their source, which we cannot trust.
- And how is that a “source” anyway? lol – seriously? Fraudulent fact-checkers referring to another fraudulent fact-checker as their “evidence”? Where’s the images of the vials as proof, or the studies showing what you claim, or any link to “something” – an interview with an actual person who works in the “manufacturing” of the vaccines – anything more credible other than ‘a person working for another fact-checker – the same one hired for Pfizer’s global messaging, of which both had the same bosses for years’ (Pfizer Director and Reuters CEO & President) , “says” that it would be black? How do people not pick this up?
Took me 2 seconds to find this one (although I’d have to pay EURO $42 for the whole publication which I’m not going to do) which mentions directly in the abstract “The resultant Fe3O4/rGO sheets were demonstrated to possess interesting magnetic and electrochemical properties attractive for a large variety of potential applications.” (08) Fullsize image was found in another publication (see Figure 20), which mentioned “Increasing the Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the surface of the graphene sheet was found to decrease the adsorption capacity, while the magnetization increased.” and you can see the magnet sticking to the “transparent-looking” vial. (09)
Another image found from a publication (PMC3715233) showed the Graphene-Oxide tested was transparent-amber in colour (AstraZeneca is the same shade) – see Figure 1, first vial A which has 0.45 mg graphene-oxide (the comparison vials B-F have added gold nanoparticles solutions of differing concentrations). (10)
The researchers at CMU working on ‘remote controlling heart cells and brain neurons‘ – funded by DARPA & NIH – say:
“Graphene is nearly 200 times stronger than steel, flexible, nearly transparent and highly conductive. Since graphene is a single layer of carbon atoms connected in a hexagonal pattern, it is thin and lightweight, making it attractive for nanotechnology applications such as building nanodevices for biomedical applications. Graphene’s ability to store electric charges is attracting the attention of technologies. This feature is largely derived from graphene’s high amount of surface area relative to its volume.“ (11)
The following publications directly elude to graphene-related materials being used because of their “optical transparency“
- “…graphene has been considered as a viable substitute for indium tin oxide (ITO) due to its optical transparency, excellent electrical conductivity, and chemical stability.” PMC6356588 (12)
- “Graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide have been widely considered as promising candidates for industrial and biomedical applications due to their exceptionally high mechanical stiffness and strength, excellent electrical conductivity, high optical transparency, and good biocompatibility.” PMC6274822 (13)
- “Here, graphene’s role is studied as an electromagnetically transparent electrode in a piezoelectric graphene respiratory sensor (GRS) device… “ PMID: 32965091 (14)
Etc. etc. I’m not inferring any of the above is in the vaccines, (that’s what we’re trying to figure out because they aren’t telling us what’s in the damn vials!)… I am saying there is 161 pages of research – over 1,600 articles on pubmed that contains “graphene transparent” in the abstract, and that you haven’t fact-checked anything because even my ‘random pick of the first 3 articles on pubmed – without even knowing what their concentrations are – is more believable than a “guy at Reuters/Pfizer says the vial would be black“.
Time for the truth on the presence of graphene in the shots
