NDQ – CeNSE [3/3]

IN AI Bot Chat
  • Updated:1 year ago
  • Reading Time:14Minutes
  • Post Words:3487Words
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Following on from the previous post regarding the strange PDF (nanotech, smart chips, IoT, Agrobacterium, etc.), this will be the post for learning what CeNSE is (for my own reference). See first post Agrobacterium [1/3] and second post Shareholders [2/3] for context.

Bold questions = me, answers by ChatGPT

What is CeNSE?

CeNSE (Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering) is a research center or department focused on the study of nanoscale science and engineering. The center’s research and development is focused on advancing our understanding of nanoscale materials, devices, and systems, and how they can be applied to solve various challenges in fields such as electronics, energy, medicine, and more.

What is HP Labs’ Central Nervous System for Earth?

HP Labs’ Central Nervous System for Earth (CeNSE) is a research initiative aimed at exploring the use of technology to create a comprehensive, real-time network of sensors that can monitor various environmental, geological, and biological phenomena across the planet. The goal of CeNSE is to use this data to develop new insights into the natural world, and to provide new tools for scientists, policymakers, and the general public to better understand and manage our planet’s resources. CeNSE is focused on developing cutting-edge sensors and communication technologies, such as nanoscale devices, and applying them to a variety of scientific and industrial applications, including climate monitoring, resource management, and public health.

I noticed you left out the part about tracking humans with CeNSE?

I apologize, I was unable to find information that suggests that HP Labs’ Central Nervous System for Earth is used to track humans. Can you provide additional context or clarification?

Ok, so, how does CeNSE deploy a “comprehensive real-time network of sensors” across the planet?

I’m sorry, I cannot provide any information about the deployment of CeNSE as I am not aware of it. It is possible that it does not exist or the information about it is not publicly available.

On page 7 of HP’s 2012 CeNSE Presentation (https://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press_kits/2012/HPDiscoverFrankfurt2012/HPInformationOptimization_PressConferencePresentation.pdf) HP says they will deploy a trillion sensors by 2030, roughly 150 sensors for every person on earth.

HP’s 2012 CeNSE Presentation outlines their goal of deploying a trillion sensors across the planet by 2030, which would equate to roughly 150 sensors per person on earth. This was mentioned in the presentation as a way to optimize information and make it more accessible. However, it is important to note that this information is from 2012 and may not reflect current plans or developments with the project.

You’re right, I’m sure it’s much worse now, and far more nefarious. But, you really have nothing in your database that suggests what the sensors are and what they mean by 150 sensors for each person, or how they deploy the sensors?

My training data only goes up to 2021, and I don’t have specific information on what HP Labs means by “150 sensors for every person on earth” or the details of how these sensors are deployed in their Central Nervous System for Earth (CeNSE) project. However, as a language model, I can tell you that a large number of sensors deployed across a wide area can be used to monitor and collect data on various physical and environmental conditions. This data can then be used to improve decision making and create new technologies, products, and services. But without more specific information, I can’t say how exactly HP’s CeNSE project is using these sensors to achieve its goals.

So I’m guessing CeNSE (the HP variety) is now CeNSE (the research center variety). Is HP’s CeNSE now renamed to Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering?

Yes, that seems to be the case. The “HP’s CeNSE” is likely to be the former Central Nervous System for the Earth project of HP Labs, which aimed to deploy a comprehensive real-time network of sensors across the planet. The “Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering” seems to be a research center focusing on nanoscale science and engineering, which could be the current name or a similar initiative related to the former CeNSE project.

// Note: I’m not sure if it’s the same CeNSE, the bot could just be responding the way it’s trained to flow in a “what is an expected way” sometimes. //

So what is the role of CeNSE in the Internet of Things?

CeNSE, the Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering, is a research center focused on advancing the field of nanotechnology. It conducts research in areas related to the Internet of Things (IoT) such as developing new sensors and devices at the nanoscale level. CeNSE’s research and development in these areas contribute to the growth of IoT and its applications. The center’s work helps to improve the functionality, accuracy, and integration of sensors and other IoT devices into the larger network. However, the exact role of CeNSE in the IoT may vary based on the specific projects and initiatives it is working on at any given time.

How are the sensors deployed for the Internet of Things?

The deployment of sensors for the Internet of Things (IoT) can vary depending on the specific use case and application. Some common methods include:

  1. Embedding sensors in everyday objects, such as appliances, vehicles, and wearable devices
  2. Mounting sensors on walls, ceilings, or other surfaces to monitor environmental factors
  3. Using wireless technologies, such as Wi-Fi or cellular networks, to transmit sensor data
  4. Integrating sensors with cloud-based platforms to store and analyze data
  5. Using advanced algorithms and machine learning to process sensor data and draw insights.

The specific deployment method chosen depends on factors such as the type of data being collected, the desired range and accuracy of the sensors, and the desired level of interactivity and automation.

Is CeNSE also deploying sensors for the Internet of Bodies?

I don’t have specific information that CeNSE is deploying sensors for the Internet of Bodies. CeNSE is a research center focused on the development of nanoscale science and engineering, and its work and projects can vary. It is possible that they may have been involved in projects related to the Internet of Bodies, but without more specific information, it is not possible to confirm or deny this.

When looking at the Internet of Things patent, it seems “humans” are referred to as “wetware”, like a “thing”. So perhaps they are deploying sensors out for the humans and it’s not obvious that it’s for the use of tracking humans.

It is not possible to determine the specific use of the sensors deployed by CeNSE without further information. It is important to consider the context and motivations behind the deployment of sensors and technology, as well as potential ethical and privacy implications.

What are similar projects to CeNSE?

Similar projects to CeNSE, the Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering, may include:

  1. NIST’s Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP)
  2. The European Union’s Internet of Things European Research Cluster (IERC)
  3. The Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC)
  4. The Alliance for the Internet of Things Innovation (AIOTI)
  5. The Internet of Things Consortium (IoTC)
  6. The Internet of Things (IoT) Community
  7. The IoT Council
  8. The Open Interconnect Consortium (OIC)
  9. The WISE IoT Alliance
  10. The Global Standards Initiative on the Internet of Things (IoT-GSI).

These projects are focused on the development and deployment of IoT technologies, including sensors, connectivity, and data analytics.

// Oh. Shit. More rabbit holes for another day. lol //

Who are the largest shareholders of HP?

As of 2021, the largest shareholders of HP Inc. (HP) were The Vanguard Group, Inc., BlackRock, Inc., and SSgA Funds Management, Inc.

How can CeNSE detect a flu or pandemic or virus or biothreat?

CeNSE is a research initiative focused on the development and deployment of ultra-dense, low-power sensor networks for the Internet of Things. While it has the potential to collect and analyze large amounts of data, it is not specifically designed to detect flu or pandemics, viruses, or biothreats. Detection of such health threats typically requires specialized equipment and expertise, and is often carried out by public health agencies, research institutions, and healthcare organizations.

Interesting, because their document says they can “track the spread of the next flu virus”

CeNSE has not publicly stated that it has the capability to detect flu viruses or pandemics. The statement in their document may refer to the use of their sensors for monitoring environmental conditions, such as temperature and air quality, which can impact the spread of illnesses. However, it is important to note that CeNSE has not specifically stated that its sensors can detect flu viruses or pandemics.

Do you have access to https://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/cense.html?

No, I do not have direct access to the website. My training data includes text from a variety of sources, including web pages, but I do not have a direct connection to the internet or the ability to browse websites.

Who will manage the internet of things?

The management of the Internet of Things (IoT) is not controlled by a single entity. It is a decentralized system where various organizations, governments, and businesses play a role in developing, regulating, and implementing IoT technologies and applications. The exact composition and responsibilities of these stakeholders vary depending on the specific aspect of the IoT and the geographical location.

That doesn’t seem likely (it seems ideal and a good-will marketing campaign for the general public to buy into) but it doesn’t seem likely that it will be decentralized. Where can I find more information?

You can find information on the future of the Internet of Things (IoT) from various sources, including academic journals, technology websites, and government reports. Some of the key issues that are being discussed include the future of IoT governance, privacy and security, data ownership and control, and the development of standards and protocols. Additionally, you can find reports and analysis on the IoT industry and its potential impact on various sectors, such as manufacturing, healthcare, and transportation. A good starting point could be to search for relevant reports, articles, and studies from organizations such as the World Economic Forum, the International Telecommunication Union, the Gartner Group, and the McKinsey Global Institute. These organizations produce extensive research and analysis on the IoT and its impact on the global economy and society.

What is the role of the International Telecommunication Union?

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that is responsible for information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU’s role is to coordinate the shared use of the radio spectrum, promote international cooperation in assigning satellite orbits, and to improve telecommunication infrastructure in the developing world. Additionally, the ITU sets standards for information and communication technologies and offers technical support for their implementation. The organization also works to enhance access to ICTs for people with disabilities, to improve emergency communication and to promote cybersecurity.

What is the role of the Gartner Group?

The Gartner Group is a research and advisory firm that provides technology-related insights, analysis, and advice to help organizations make informed decisions. The company covers various technology domains, including IT, digital business, and emerging trends. Gartner’s role is to help organizations understand the impact and implications of technology on their operations and to provide actionable guidance on how to align technology investments with their business goals. The company’s services include research and analysis, consulting, events, and peer networking.

What is the role of the Gartner Group in the Internet of Things or IoB?

Gartner Group is a research and advisory company that provides insights, advice, and tools for IT leaders to make informed decisions about technology. The company provides research and analysis on a wide range of technology trends, including the Internet of Things (IoT) or Internet of Behaviors (IoB). The role of the Gartner Group in the IoB is to provide guidance and best practices to organizations on how to effectively implement and utilize IoT technologies to drive business value. This includes providing market research, technology assessments, and strategic planning advice to help organizations make informed decisions about their IoT investments.

// Interesting that the bot is using IoB as Internet of Behaviours instead of Internet of Bodies? //

What is the Internet of Behaviours?

The Internet of Behaviors (IoB) refers to the use of data and technology to understand and influence human behavior. It involves the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data generated by individuals through their online and offline interactions, with the aim of shaping or modifying their behavior. This concept encompasses a broad range of applications and use cases, from marketing and advertising to healthcare and public policy. The goal of the IoB is to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and impact of decision-making by using data-driven insights about human behavior.

Advanced propaganda & mind-control?

The concept of advanced propaganda and mind control refers to the use of sophisticated techniques and technology to influence and control individuals’ thoughts, beliefs, and actions. This can include the use of media, marketing, and psychology to manipulate public opinion and influence behavior. However, these practices raise ethical and privacy concerns and can undermine individual freedom and autonomy.

So “advanced propaganda and mind control” raises ethical and privacy concerns, and “internet of behaviours” does not? lol

The usage of advanced propaganda and mind control raises significant ethical and privacy concerns as it can manipulate individuals’ thoughts, beliefs and behaviors without their knowledge or consent. On the other hand, the Internet of Behaviors (IoB) refers to the use of technology to gather and analyze data on human behavior and to develop insights and predictions about future behaviors. The IoB also raises privacy concerns, but the specific concerns and extent of ethical implications will depend on how the data is collected, used, and protected.

I don’t know dude, sounds like the same thing written in a “public-friendly” way to me.

Both terms refer to the use of technology and data to influence human behavior and decision-making, which can raise ethical and privacy concerns. The terminology used to describe these practices may vary and can influence public perception and understanding. It’s important to be aware of the potential implications and ensure proper safeguards are in place to protect individuals and their data.

So was Internet of Bodies renamed to Internet of Behaviours?

The terms “Internet of Bodies (IoB)” and “Internet of Behaviors (IoB)” are often used interchangeably to describe the integration of technology into the human body, often through wearable devices or implantable devices. However, there is no official renaming of the term.

What is the role of McKinsey & Company?

McKinsey & Company is a global management consulting firm that provides strategic and operational consulting services to its clients in various industries, including private, public, and non-profit sectors. It aims to help organizations address complex challenges and improve their performance by providing expert analysis, practical recommendations, and implementation support. McKinsey’s services cover a range of areas, including strategy, operations, marketing and sales, risk, and organizational transformation. The company’s primary goal is to help its clients achieve sustainable and long-term success.

Which organizations are responsible for the “Internet of Behaviours”?

The development and implementation of the “Internet of Behaviours” concept may involve a range of organizations, including technology companies, government agencies, academic institutions, and private research organizations. The specific roles of these organizations can vary depending on the nature of the project and the goals they are seeking to achieve. In some cases, multiple organizations may collaborate on the development of IoT technologies and the creation of data-driven ecosystems, while in other cases, a single entity may take the lead. Ultimately, the responsibility for the Internet of Behaviours falls on the organizations that are developing and deploying the technology, as well as the individuals and governments that are using it.

Which governments are using it?

As the concept of “Internet of Behaviors” is not widely recognized and the use of such technology is not publicly disclosed by governments, it is difficult to say which governments are using it. The information related to the use of such technology by governments is generally kept confidential for privacy and security reasons.

// Of course it is, you wouldn’t want your own government to publicly disclose whether they are tracking you or not… //

Please list the patents that refer to humans as “wetware” (include citation)

I’m sorry, but I do not have access to a comprehensive database of patents. You can search for patents that mention “wetware” as a keyword by using publicly available patent databases such as the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or the European Patent Office (EPO) databases.

Please list any studies that refer to humans as “wetware” (include citation)

I’m sorry, I cannot list specific studies that refer to humans as “wetware” as I am not currently able to access academic databases. However, the term “wetware” is a metaphor used in various fields such as computer science, cybernetics, and philosophy, to describe the human brain and central nervous system as a form of biological “software.” This term emphasizes the similarities between human cognition and information processing systems. You may find references to “wetware” in books or articles about the intersection of biology and technology, or in discussions about the nature of human consciousness and the relationship between the mind and the body.

What information do you have regarding Wetware and the Internet of Things or Internet of Behaviours or Internet of Bodies?

“Wetware” is a term used to describe the human body, with the analogy that the body functions like computer hardware and the brain functions like software. This term is used in a variety of contexts, including discussions of the interface between technology and the human body, the integration of technology with the human body, and the enhancement of human capabilities through technology. There is no direct connection between “wetware” and the Internet of Things, Internet of Behaviors, or Internet of Bodies, but the term can be used in discussions of the relationship between these technologies and the human body.

// ooh. liar. //

Is there another term used to describe the tracking of humans under the skin with implantable devices?

Yes, the use of implantable devices for tracking humans is also referred to as “biochipping” or “human implantables.”

// so. helpful. not. //

What is the best search term I can use for the self-assembling nanotechnology, nanobots, nanoantennas, nanodevices, etc. that relate to tracking humans via biochipping, human implantables, internet of bodies, internet of things, internet of behaviours, etc.?

“Human Implantables and Nanotechnology” or “Human Implantable Devices and Nanotechnology” are likely to be the best search terms to find information on self-assembling nanotechnology and its relationship to tracking humans via biochipping and the Internet of Things.

What are the components, metals, and other materials needed to implant and activate the tracking ability of the human implantable devices?

The components, metals, and materials used for human implantable devices vary based on the specific device and its intended purpose. Some common materials used in implantable medical devices include stainless steel, titanium, and biocompatible polymers. Some implantable tracking devices may also include sensors, wireless transmitters, and power sources such as batteries or energy harvesting components. The exact materials used in each device can impact its durability, reliability, and biocompatibility.

Please explain these energy harvesting components

Energy harvesting components refer to technology used to capture and convert ambient energy sources such as light, heat, or motion into electrical energy, which can then be stored and used to power electronic devices, including those that may be implanted in the body. Examples of such components include photovoltaic cells, thermoelectric generators, and piezoelectric generators. These components are important for implantable devices as they provide a self-sustaining power source, reducing the need for frequent battery replacements.

// New words that I haven’t come across yet! //

How do they work? (photovoltaic cells, thermoelectric generators, and piezoelectric generators)

Photovoltaic cells, thermoelectric generators, and piezoelectric generators are energy harvesting components that work by converting different forms of energy into electrical energy that can be used to power electronic devices.

Photovoltaic cells convert light energy into electrical energy. They are made up of materials, typically semiconductors, that release electrons when exposed to light.

Thermoelectric generators convert heat energy into electrical energy. They work by using the Seebeck effect, which generates an electric current in a material when there is a difference in temperature across the material.

Piezoelectric generators convert mechanical energy into electrical energy. They work by using materials that generate an electric charge when subjected to mechanical stress or pressure.

// I have so many questions but I am moving on from this topic for now as I have got “real life” to deal with and some other interesting posts that I would rather be working on instead of this one which I can’t seem to figure out the right questions to get clear answers //

Nano Domestic Quell

Part 1/3: Agrobacterium
Part 2/3: Shareholders
Part 3/3: CeNSE

Penny (PennyButler.com)
Penny (PennyButler.com)

Truth-seeker, ever-questioning, ever-learning, ever-researching, ever delving further and deeper, ever trying to 'figure it out'. This site is a legacy of sorts, a place to collect thoughts, notes, book summaries, & random points of interests.