New Boosters approved that were tested only on Mice (What happened to them?)

IN JABS

So the new updated Pfizer “booster” was tested on exactly EIGHT mice and ZERO humans…and we cannot access the data, and the updated Moderna “boostered mice” all got Covid. Both were approved anyway… because………………. $cience?

What happened to the Mice?

  1. Booster Doses of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccines in Adults, Adolescents & Children – CDC.gov (See Slide 22) (01)
  2. All “Bivalent Boosted” Mice Got Covid When Challenged. ACIP slide says that all 10 mice got Covid anyways. Who cares, right? – Igor Chudov (02)
  3. What They’re Not Telling You About the New mRNA Boosters – GlobalResearch.ca (03)
  4. Bivalent Booster’s “8-Mice Trial” Actually FAILED – Canada Health Alliance (04)
  5. “Updated” Covid-19 mRNA Injections Approved After Testing on 8 Mice and 0 Humans – World Council for Health (05)
  6. New COVID booster approved from study of 8 mice, not humans with lots of questions from the public – Dr Panda (06)
  7. Yes, the FDA Approved the New mRNA Booster on Data from 8 Mice – Independent Sentinel (07)
  8. Bivalent Booster’s “8-Mice Trial” Actually FAILED – Igor Chudov (08)
  9. So the new “booster” was tested on exactly EIGHT mice and ZERO humans… And all of society tells you you should be shunned if you refuse to take it. Welcome to 2022. – Reddit thread (09)
  10. FDA expected to authorize new Covid boosters without data from tests in people. The lack of human data means officials likely won’t know how much better the new shots are — if at all — until the fall booster campaign is well underway. – NBC News (10)
  11. US criticised for rolling out Covid boosters without human trials – Financial Times (11)

Please, for the love of God, don’t give up trying to get through to the people you love. Please don’t stop trying to wake up your friends and family and government officials who are under the spell.

Steve Kirsch’s CDC insider says they have all drunk all the Kool-Aid over at the CDC where they all believe the “safe & effective” lie without question, without thought, without data. And the FDA only had one lone voice questioning the booster approval after it was only tested on 8 mice and the Moderna mice all got Covid, so they have drunk the Kool-Aid over at the FDA as well.

Government officials have been touting safe & effective so long that they either believe their own lies or are just covering up their crimes since all the data proves everything they said wrong. It’s insanity now. We need to keep trying to find a way to get through. Many people are waking up, but whilst the officials refuse to see common sense amidst the atrocities already inflicted, it’s going to be insane for a while longer.

booster-8mice-wc4h

“Updated” Covid-19 mRNA Injections Approved After Testing on 8 Mice and 0 Humans

Related Short Clips:

Updated booster now available to all Americans, but has it been tested on humans?

Updated booster now available to all Americans, but has it been tested on humans?

YouTube | Telegram | Rebel News USA

Normally, a novel vaccine is tested on tens of thousands of real human beings who knowingly take part in a trial, and sometimes it takes an entire decade to tweak and prove the vaccines safety.

The United States just made a new COVID booster available to the public. This updated booster is different from the other COVID shots and boosters. What sets it apart is the way in which it was tested, or the way it was not tested.

The updated booster has not been tested on any humans. The current updated booster that’s available at every CVS and Walgreens in the country, has not been tested on any people, but apparently only eight mice. 

Normally, a novel vaccine is tested on tens of thousands of real human beings who knowingly take part in a trial, and sometimes it takes an entire decade to tweak and prove the vaccines safety. 

But with the COVID emergency, consent has been manufactured to all but skip testing entirely. These vaccines are being approved under an emergency use authorization (EUA). 

While the mainstream media historically always found a way to ignore the lack of safety data, or the negative safety signals of the COVID vaccine, the fact that these updated boosters haven’t been tested on humans yet is a fact that they are addressing. 

But of course, even though they are addressing it, the well-paid pundits are explaining the fact that the shot hasn’t been tested on humans is totally fine. It’s just like a flu shot, they argue. 

Even experts who sit on the FDA safety panel fiercely opposed the emergency authorization of this updated shot and explained that comparing its approval to the flu shot is not a fair, or safe, comparison. 

Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and FDA committee member explained: 

The FDA’s policy on influenza shots is based on decades of experience with strain changes where the flu vaccines behaved generally in the same way. 

The U.S. is still on its first iteration of the COVID vaccines, and the mRNA technology has only been in widespread use since late 2020. The agency is making ‘huge assumptions’ in its consideration of the new COVID boosters.

I’m uncomfortable that we would move forward — that we would give millions or tens of millions of doses to people — based only on mouse data.

With the entire mainstream media and FDA in agreement on the objective fact that the “updated” booster wasn’t tested in any humans, I thought for sure that the large pharmacies actually administering the shot to Americans would be forthcoming with that information. 

So I went to a corporate chain pharmacy in New York City as if I were trying to get the updated booster. To see what I was told by the pharmacist, watch my report.

FDA Dr. Paul Offit Speaks out against Updated Boosters - No Data

Dr. Paul Offit Surprisingly Speaks Out Against the FDA Authorizing Pfizer’s Latest Boosters

Rumble

“Right now they are saying that we should trust mouse data and I don’t think that should ever be true. I don’t think you should ever ask tens of millions of people to get a vaccine based on mouse data.”

New Omicron Booster Only Tested On 8 Mice

Kim Iversen: New Omicron Booster Only Tested On 8 Mice, CDC Director Says Everyone 12+ Must Take

Rumble

COVID Booster Approved Despite ZERO Human Testing

COVID Booster Approved Despite ZERO Human Testing

Rumble | YouTube

The FDA has announced emergency use authorization of a booster shot that targets the omicron BA.5 COVID variant. How the current state of the pandemic qualifies as an “emergency” is anyone’s guess. As is the likely effect on anyone given the booster since the authorization process did not involve any actual human testing. In fact, the little information Pfizer has made available to the public involves tests performed on eight mice. And that’s it!

Jimmy Dore and comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the public’s dwindling interest in boosters and the skepticism from knowledgeable experts over the value of endless COVID boosters.

FDA Authorized 5th Booster. Clinical Trial ONLY on 8 Mice

Clay Travis: FDA Authorized 5th Booster. Clinical Trial ONLY on 8 Mice.

Rumble

Authorized with any Clinical testing on Humans.

FDA Authorized 5th Booster “Does any body think it’s going to stop at 5?”

WHO Chief Scientist says Unknown Benefit

WHO Chief Scientist admits: UNKNOWN whether new bivalent COVID jabs provide ANY clinical benefit

Rumble Clip | Full Video World Hell/Homocide Organization YouTube

WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan talks about the new bivalent COVID jabs that have been approved and are currently being produced for injection in the next few months. They are supposed to contain the genetic code for the alpha variant (which has been extinct for 2.5 years) and the omicold variant (which will have been extinct for almost a year by the time these new products roll out and was always between a cold and the flu in terms severity).

Earlier in the interview, Swaminathan explained that there are still way too many ‘COVID’ deaths, but she conveniently neglected to mention whether these are due to COVID or merely with a positive hyper oversensitive test or mere suspicion of COVID. This is of course a critical distinction.

She also says that the antibodies produced by the COVID jabs are non-neutralizing for the omicron variant, so they have no benefit in terms of infection and transmission. (Explain to me again why they are being mandated if that is the case.)

According to Swaminathan, people are still well protected due to T-cells which prevent escalating replication by destroying infected cells. This may be true, but this would happen anyway and the injections likely had no benefit whatsoever for T-cells.

In this segment she explains that the bivalent jabs have shown a strong antibody response, i.e. the body produces many antibodies after injection. However, she just explained that antibodies play a minor role at best. They haven’t PROVEN that the antibodies are neutralizing in this case; they’ve merely CLAIMED they are.

All in all, it is totally unknown whether a strong antibody response translates to any clinical benefit. This is of course all we should care about. We want to be protected from severe disease, not have a lab test showing many antibodies.

The ONLY trial data on these new products is lab data on a mere 8 mice for Pfizer and 10 mice for Moderna! Worse, when the mice got challenged after injection, ALL of them got ‘COVID’.

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/ba5-boosters-8-mice-trial-actually
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/all-bivalent-boosted-mice-got-covid

She ends this interview with, “At the moment we believe that the original vaccines that we are all using today are working very well … and a third dose is important for everyone and a fourth dose for … the very high risk groups.”

This tells you everything about their BELIEFS and NOTHING about the FACTS, which tell the exact opposite story. She could just as well have said, “We believe the 2 + 2 = 5.”

IN SUMMARY

  1. Omicold (COVID-22) is a mild variant. If you are in good health, you have little to fear statistically and don’t need additional protection. If you are not in good health, you should do everything possible to get in good health, e.g. healthy diet/lifestyle/environment.
  2. ‘COVID’ deaths have been and are extremely overreported: the majority of them died due to other causes, but were reported as COVID deaths.
  3. The COVID jabs are by far the most toxic jabs in the history of mankind with non-negligible risk of severe injury, long-lasting/permanent injury, and death. There are already severe safety signals regarding (turbo) cancer, neurodegenerative disease (e.g. Alzheimer, Parkinson) and reduced fertility.
  4. The COVID jabs are associated with NEGATIVE protection against ALL infectious diseases: the more you inject, the more you infect and re-infect (VAIDS)
  5. The new bivalent jabs are certainly not less dangerous, and may be even more dangerous than the previous monovalent jabs.
  6. The new bivalent jabs produce a strong antibody response in mice, but previous experience has shown that this is unlikely to have any clinical benefit in terms of protection against severe disease.
  7. The ONLY trial data on the new jabs was in 8 and 10 mice respectively for Pfizer and Moderna, in which case it didn’t even work.

If you are a masochist, have a death wish and/or like Russian roulette, the new bivalent jabs may be a good option for you. Everybody else should avoid these products like the plague.

Dr John Campbell : FDA approve BA.5 vaccine, no human trials

FDA approve BA.5 vaccine, no human trials

Rumble | YouTube | Dr John Campbell

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration, amended the emergency use authorizations (EUAs), https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-moderna-pfizer-biontech-bivalent-covid-19-vaccines-use of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to authorize bivalent formulations BA.4 and BA.5 lineages of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2.
  • Omicron booster shots, with lots of questions https://www.science.org/content/article/omicron-booster-shots-are-coming-lots-questions (12)
    • United Kingdom has authorized Moderna Omicron subvariant BA.1
    • Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech, have submitted data about their BA.4/BA.5 vaccines
    • Biden administration has already placed an order for 170 million doses.
  • What do the new boosters contain?
    • Messenger RNA (mRNA) coding for the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Bivalent, Wuhan strain and BA.1 or BA.4 and BA.5 (which have identical spikes)
  • What sort of data have the companies collected?
    • Human data, only available BA.1 booster. BA.1 trails did not look for protection against severe disease, (People trials are very expensive). For the BA.4/BA.5 boosters, the companies have submitted animal data. (not released publicly). Pfizer presented preliminary findings in eight mice given BA.4/BA.5 vaccines as their third dose, (for EMA) Showed an increased antibody response to all Omicron variants tested: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5.
    • Clinical trials for the BA.4/BA.5 vaccines will begin next month.
  • Why still target the ancestral strain?
    • Probably for new variants, more polyclonal response. Still has some neutralising power against the new variants.
  • If the benefits are limited, do we really need the new boosters?
    • Some scientists don’t think we do.
  • Paul Offit, vaccine researcher, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • If the goal is to stop infections, even updated vaccines will have little impact (Incubation period is too short). (Measles or rubella, 2-week incubation period, so can stop spread) even if 100% of the population were vaccinated, and the virus hadn’t evolved at all, vaccines would do very little to stop transmission
  • The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA’s Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem? https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2018/06/28/the-biopharmaceutical-industry-provides-75-of-the-fdas-drug-review-budget-is-this-a-problem/?sh=7bf0d65049ec
    • Dr. Thomas Marciniak (former FDA medical team leader). You don’t survive as a senior official at the FDA unless you’re pro-industry.
    • The FDA has to pay attention to what Congress tells them to do, and the industry will lobby to get somebody else in there if they don’t like you.
  • Pfizer https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/may/03/pfizer-covid-sales-pricing-vaccine-paxlovid-pill has made nearly $26bn (£21bn) in revenues in the first three months of the year.
    • Covid-19 vaccines and treatments. Expects record sales of $98bn to $102bn this year, half of which will come from Covid products, Comirnaty and Paxlovid prompting fresh accusations of pandemic profiteering.
  • AstraZeneca, Chief executive officer, Pascal Soriot https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/astrazeneca-people-medicines-and-healthcare-products-regulatory-agency-office-for-national-statistics-uk-government-b2154286.html (27th August)
    • Most of the vaccinated population has a foundation immunity against severe disease. People who are otherwise healthy – especially if they are young, have been vaccinated, have had a boost already – boosting them again, I’m just not sure it’s really a good use of resources. Foundation immunity lasts, a long time, we don’t know if it’s one year, two years, three years. I think more than one year for sure.
    • On boosting people every year. I’m not sure it’s a really good use of money, because most of the people now who catch it will just have symptoms if they get Covid, and that’s it.

Russell Brqand : You're not going to fucking believe this

You’re Not Going To F*cking Believe This

YouTube | Rumble | Russell Brand – Sept 6th 2022

As the FDA authorizes updated booster shots tested on mice, and the White House appears to admit that natural immunity provides COVID protection, which other previously taboo talking points are becoming increasingly inconvenient to the establishment? #covid #pandemic #joerogan #boosters

References

  1. FDA clears updated COVID-19 vaccines ahead of fall booster campaign (13)
  2. Latest COVID booster shots will be released before human testing is complete (14)
  3. Omicron booster shots are coming—with lots of questions (15)
  4. Booster jabs for all ‘not a good use’ of taxpayer cash, says AstraZeneca boss (16)
  5. The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA’s Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem? (17)
  6. Why is the FDA funded in part by the companies it regulates? (18)
  7. Instagram ‘fueling conspiracy theorists’ by banning #naturalimmunity hashtag (19)
  8. Paxlovid, Pfizer’s COVID pill, showed no measurable benefit in adults 40 to 65, study says (20)
  9. Pfizer accused of Covid profiteering as first-quarter sales hit $26bn (21)
  10. As the pandemic raged, at least 75 lawmakers bought and sold stock in companies that make COVID-19 vaccines, treatments, and tests (22)
  11. Insufficient vitamin D linked to fourfold increase in risk of death among Covid-19 patients. Irish researchers find unvaccinated patients with low vitamin D levels are more likely to suffer severe disease and death (23)

Fauci: We Don’t Have Time to Do a Clinical Trial

Fauci Says “We Don’t Have Time to Do a Clinical Trial” for Updated COVID-19 mRNA Booster Injection

Dr. Fauci claims there is not enough time to wait for clinical trials before deploying updated COVID-19 mRNA booster injections into the arms of millions of people.

“We don’t have time to do a clinical trial because we need to get the vaccine out now,” Fauci said on CBC this week, per The Epoch Times. (24)

The shots contain elements of the original COVID strain and the BA.4, and BA.5 variants of SARS-CoV-2. But no human data has been made available for the formulations.

Preclinical testing data from experiments on mice were presented by both of the pharmaceutical firms, and references were made to the human data for a different formulation, combinations of the original and BA.1 strains.

The director of the CDC, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, said on August 29 that waiting for data from human clinical trials would leave the boosters outdated.

“If we wait for those data to emerge in human data, not just mice data, we will be using what I would consider to be a potentially outdated vaccine,” Walensky said.

Professor of Epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, Dr. Harvey Risch, was critical of Walensky and called Fauci’s comments “reckless,” saying that the CDC shows that variant BA.4.6, which is not part of the updated boosters, is becoming a more prevalent strain.

“By the time that a supposed new winter wave of infections would occur in late November or December, it will likely be BA.4.6 and the new booster will be outdated anyway,” Risch said.

Even if BA.5 continues to be the dominant strain, the duration of the new booster’s benefit likely won’t be much better than the current one, which just provides an increase in protection for several weeks, Risch argued, referencing a published study in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The following by Dr Joseph Mercola (13 Sept 2022) Source: GlobalResearch.ca (25)

New Booster Rollout With No Human Testing

Rumble | September 5, 2022 — Dr Meryl Nass | Toby Rogers | Brian Hooker
(Make sure to at least watch the last minute of the video which is the lone voice of one of the FDA guys saying he’d prefer to wait for human data before approval)

“COVID-19 shots are the most dangerous medical products in human history,” says Toby Rogers, Ph.D. The panel in this episode exposes the illness, death, controversy, and tyranny that continues to perpetuate but is completely ignored and silenced by the media, health officials, and a portion of the world population. They break down recent vaccine recommendations, frameworks, and data, while also sharing resources for viewers to seek and ways to get involved in the continued fight.

August 31, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the reformulated mRNA COVID bivalent boosters, and they didn’t even allow members of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to meet, discuss or vote on the matter

The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met for eight hours September 1, 2022, and authorized the untested boosters 13-to-1. CDC director Rochelle Walensky endorsed the recommendation later that evening

Pfizer’s new booster is a bivalent injection targeting Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5, which are the two currently in circulation, while Moderna’s shot targets the already extinct Wuhan strain and Omicron subvariant BA.1

The bivalent boosters will only be available to those who have already received the primary two-dose series and/or a monovalent booster at least two months ago

Pfizer’s bivalent booster was tested on a total of eight mice, and they only checked antibody levels, even though antibodies cannot tell you whether the shot actually protects against infection and symptomatic and/or serious illness. Moderna also used mice to ascertain antibody responses, but has not disclosed the number of mice used

With their authorization of reformulated COVID mRNA boosters without the standard steps of testing, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have completely abandoned science. They’re both simply rubber stamping whatever the drug industry wants to do, without any concern for public health whatsoever. (26)

August 31, 2022, the FDA authorized the reformulated shots, and they didn’t even allow members of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to meet, discuss or vote on the matter. (27)

Instead, they pushed the matter before the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). ACIP met for eight hours September 1, 2022, and authorized the untested boosters 13-to-1. CDC director Rochelle Walensky endorsed the recommendation later that evening. As reported by Yahoo! News: (28) (29) (30)

“Because the Biden administration has pushed for a fall booster campaign to begin in September, the mRNA vaccine-makers Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have only had time to test the reformulated shots in mice, not people.

That means the Food and Drug Administration is relying on the mice trial data — plus human trial results from a similar vaccine that targets the original omicron strain, called BA.1 — to evaluate the new shots …

That could be a potentially risky bet, experts say, if the shots don’t work as well as hoped … the lack of data in humans means officials likely won’t know how much better the new shots are — if at all — until the fall booster campaign is well underway.

The FDA’s decision to move forward without data from human trials is a gamble, experts say, threatening to further lower public trust in the vaccines should the new boosters not work as intended.”

What You Need to Know About the New Boosters

Pfizer’s new booster is a bivalent injection targeting Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5, which are the two [alleged] currently in circulation, while Moderna’s shot targets the already extinct Wuhan strain and Omicron subvariant BA.1. (31)

 The bivalent boosters will only be available to those who have already received the primary two-dose series and/or a monovalent booster at least two months ago. Per the FDA: (32)

“The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent, is authorized for use as a single booster dose in individuals 18 years of age and older. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent, is authorized for use as a single booster dose in individuals 12 years of age and older …

With today’s authorization, the monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are not authorized as booster doses for individuals 12 years of age and older … These monovalent vaccines continue to be authorized for use for administration of a primary series for individuals 6 months of age and older …

Individuals 18 years of age and older are eligible for a single booster dose of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent if it has been at least two months since they have completed primary vaccination or have received the most recent booster dose with any authorized or approved monovalent COVID-19 vaccine.

Individuals 12 years of age and older are eligible for a single booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent if it has been at least two months since they have completed primary vaccination or have received the most recent booster dose with any authorized or approved monovalent COVID-19 vaccine.”

No One Can Predict Safety of These Bivalent Boosters

YouTube

For the record, these bivalent boosters are STILL under emergency use authorization (EUA) only, so manufacturers have no liability for injuries. This despite the fact that we now know that:

a) The lethality of COVID-19 was nowhere near what was initially feared (something Bill Gates is now openly admitting. A clip of him is included in “The Jimmy Dore Show” episode above)

b) The COVID shots increase your risk of COVID and prevent natural immunity from developing when you do get infected

c) The shots impair immune function in general, raising your risk of other infections and chronic diseases

d) We’re not in an emergency; COVID is now endemic and typically presents as a mild cold

e) Since the COVID shots are leaky, i.e., they cannot prevent infection, we cannot vaccinate our way out. As VRBPAC member Dr. Paul Offit recently told Science magazine, (33)

 “Even if 100% of the population were vaccinated and the virus hadn’t evolved at all, [COVID] vaccines would do very little to stop transmission”

f) There are plenty of effective treatments, which by law negates the basis for EUA vaccines

According to the FDA, the reactogenicity profile of the reformulated shot is “overall similar to prototype BNT162b2 vaccine,” and based on U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) data, that’s hardly comforting. (34)

As of August 26, 2022, VAERS has received 1,394,703 reports of adverse effects following the COVID jab,10 up from 1,390,594 the week before. That includes 134,530 urgent care visits, 175,020 hospitalizations and 30,605 deaths (up from 30,479 deaths as of August 19).

The real-world carnage is far worse than that though. Due to widespread underreporting, you have to multiply those numbers by an underreporting factor of 41 (or more) to get to closer to the true numbers. If you do the math, you will discover that the COVID jabs have been the No. 1 cause of death in the U.S. for the past two years, far exceeding heart attacks and cancers that were unrelated to the jab.

They are the deadliest drugs in medical history, bar none, and now reformulated shots are being green-lighted based on antibody data from mice alone! (35) (36)

As Dore jokingly states, “It’s been tested on mice, now put it in your baby.” What could go wrong?

Mouse Antibody Levels Tell Us Nothing About Effectiveness

Pfizer’s bivalent booster was tested on a total of eight mice, and they only checked antibody levels. Moderna also used mice to ascertain antibody responses, but have not disclosed the number of mice used.

But while the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna and the rest of this criminal cabal claim that mouse antibody levels are a testament to effectiveness, that’s simply not so. Your antibody level cannot tell you whether you’re protected against infection, symptomatic illness and serious illness.

This is why antibody testing has been discouraged throughout the pandemic as a means to determine whether the COVID shot is actually protective. (37) Making matters even more ridiculous, Pfizer isn’t even releasing what little animal data they do have on this bivalent booster.

As crazy as it is, the FDA and CDC are now treating experimental gene therapy shots like regular flu vaccines. (38) The seasonal flu vaccine is updated annually, without ever undergoing any additional safety or even efficacy testing. Efficacy is calculated after the fact. The COVID shots are now going to be updated, indefinitely, using that same process.

The problem is, you simply cannot compare the safety of changing the influenza virus included in the flu vaccine with the modification of mRNA included in a COVID shot, because they’re two very different technologies. The flu vaccine doesn’t program your body’s cells to produce a toxic spike protein.

When you change the mRNA, you change the spike protein produced, and without proper testing, there’s no way of knowing if the Omicron spike proteins will affect human biology the same way as the original spike protein, if they’ll be safer or more dangerous.

The Spike Protein Cover-Up

The CDC has lost all credibility, and no amount of internal reorganization will fix what dishonesty and anti-scientific recommendations have broken. As noted by Center for Food, Power and Life director Jon Sanders in a September 1, 2022, American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) article, CDC “facts” have a tendency to not age well these days. (39)

They’re constantly updating their COVID webpages, tweaking verbiage to conform to the current narrative while memory-holing previous statements:

“November 23, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published information on something that was on everybody’s mind: vaccines against COVID-19.

In a page titled ‘Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines,’ the CDC wanted everyone to know what to expect with the coming vaccines, which were being put forth under ‘Emergency Use Authorization’ … the FDA and CDC assured everyone they would be ‘rigorously tested’ and ‘rigorously evaluated for safety.’

Also, since the first vaccines to be rolled out would be messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines … never before licensed for use in the U.S., the CDC wanted to explain to everyone how they would work. The CDC explained the difference in vaccine types this way:

‘To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein — or even just a piece of a protein — that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. That immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies’ …

The CDC also provided ‘A Closer Look at How COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Work’ to put people’s minds at ease about the new kind of vaccine … From there we learned several things about the mRNA vaccines:

  • They cause our cells to make … the ‘spike protein’ used by the virus that causes COVID.
  • This spike protein is harmless (the CDC emphasized that fact with bold text).
  • The vaccine is injected in the upper arm muscle. Only the upper arm muscle cells … make the harmless spike protein.
  • An upper arm muscle cell makes only one harmless protein piece, then it breaks down the mRNA ‘instructions’ and gets rid of them.
  • The muscle cell displays the harmless protein piece.
  • The immune system recognizes the harmless protein piece is unnatural and builds up antibodies to it.
  • The immune system is now prepared to fight against an invasion by the real deal sporting that spike protein.”

Cha-Cha-Changes

Since November 2020, this and other CDC webpages covering COVID topics have undergone a large number of stealth revisions. For example, October 1, 2021, the CDC added the following section:

COVID-19 vaccines are not interchangeable. If you received a Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, you should get the same product for your second shot.”

Between October 18 and October 31, that section first changed to “You should get the same product for your second shot,” and later, “You should get the same product when you need another shot.”

As noted by Sanders, “This was the month in which CDC began to hedge on the total number of shots necessary to be considered ‘fully vaccinated.’” But then, November 3, when the CDC began promoting boosters, it changed the text again, now suddenly claiming that boosters did NOT need to match the product used for the primary series. Where’s the science to back that up?

In late October, the CDC also updated its “How mRNA Vaccines Work” section, adding: “Any temporary discomfort experienced after getting the vaccine is a natural part of the process and an indication that the vaccine is working.” They also changed its “Facts About COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines” sidebar, adding a third fact-heading that stated:

The mRNA and the spike protein don’t last long in the body. Our cells break down the mRNA and get rid of it within a few days after vaccination. Scientist estimate that the spike protein, like other proteins our bodies create, may stay in the body up to a few weeks.”

Before this, CDC adherents had likely assumed the spike protein vanished as rapidly as the mRNA. Then, in mid-June 2022, another round of revisions was made. Sanders writes, in part: (40)

“This update made two changes to the ‘How mRNA Vaccines Work’ section. It no longer used bold text to stress that the spike protein is ‘a harmless piece,’ even though it had done that consistently from the very beginning.

A bigger change was made to the ‘Any temporary discomfort’ sentence added in October 2021. Formerly that sentence read (emphasis added): ‘Any temporary discomfort experienced after getting the vaccine is a natural part of the process and an indication that the vaccine is working.’

The new sentence read (emphasis added): ‘Any side effects from getting the vaccine are normal signs the body is building protection.’ Readers were to adjust their expectation of natural/normal. Not ‘temporary discomfort’ but ‘side effects,’ and not a definitive ‘the vaccine is working’ but a more vague ‘the body is building protection.’”

CDC’s Biggest Fact U-Turns to Date

Fast-forward another month, and in mid-July 2022, the CDC was busy revising its COVID pages yet again. Importantly, they completely expunged the “fact” about mRNA and spike protein not lasting long in the body. So, as noted by Sanders:

“Our knowledge of the vaccines from the CDC has undergone great changes since November 2020:

  • The CDC is no longer so confident that the protein our cells are caused to manufacture by the mRNA vaccines is harmless that they display it in bold text.
  • The CDC no longer argues that our cells break down the mRNA soon after making the spike protein.
  • The CDC no longer says the spike protein may stay in the body only for a few weeks.

The constant churn of revisions leaves us with many questions, when the whole point of producing a page entitled ‘Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines’ was to prevent such a thing. They are, unfortunately, very big questions.

What does it mean if our cells don’t break down the mRNA and remove it soon? What does it mean if the spike protein they produce stays in the body much, much longer than we were originally told? Do they even know how long? What kind of lasting effects can vaccinated people expect? Are those effects exacerbated by boosting and continued boosting?

How prevalent are the effects? Do they differ for different people, and if so, by how much? Are those effects greater for small children? And are those effects at all related to the disturbing rise in non-COVID excess deaths in the U.K., Australia, and the U.S.?”

CDC Asked Facebook to Censor Claims It Has Since Revised

One of the biggest walk-backs among all these revisions is the CDC’s deletion of the claim that the spike protein is harmless and doesn’t last long in your body. A year earlier, in late July 2021, the CDC was in communication with Facebook, giving it talking points with which to debunk and censor claims that spike protein in the COVID shots is dangerous and cytotoxic. In a July 28, 2021, email, a CDC official provided the following counter-narrative: (41)

“Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine are one type of COVID-19 vaccine. Messenger mRNA [sic] vaccines work by teaching our cells to create a harmless spike protein …” (Emphasis in the original.)

The CDC also gave Facebook counter narratives with which to censor and debunk the claim that the shots could cause myocarditis, and that VAERS is a good source for evaluating vaccine adverse effects and related deaths. (42)

COVID Shot Recommendations Are a Crime in Progress

In the final analysis, what the FDA and CDC have done to the American people is an unspeakable atrocity and an unforgiveable crime. They’ve lied about and obfuscated the facts. They’ve ignored science and tossed the precautionary principle out the window.

They’ve circumvented every possible rule designed to ensure safety. They’ve rewritten both history and the definition of medical terminology. They’ve operated outside the law and violated the Constitution, and to this day, they continue to put people’s health and lives at risk — all so that drug companies can cash in on drugs that don’t work, at least not for more than a few weeks.

Anyone who believes fewer than 10 mice is sufficient to determine safety and efficacy of reformulated mRNA gene therapy does not belong in a public health position and, apparently, that’s all but one person.

It’s truly unbelievable that only one ACIP member objected to this clear and apparent madness, but that’s where we are. If you are eligible for these bivalent boosters, I would suggest you think long and hard before going down that road. Of course if you read this newsletter you likely already do think before you go there. Fortunately an ever-increasing percentage of the population is also following your lead.

What to do if you’ve taken the jab?

Posts tagged: Doctors | Myocarditis | Vaccines | Against our Will

Categories: Jab Victims | Rigged Science & Medicine | Pfizer

Most recent posts about the jabs:

References[+]

Penny... on Health
Penny... on Health

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. I do not have any medical training aside from my own research and interest in this area. The information I publish is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. I just report my own results, understanding & research.